Transistor sizing and gate sizing using geometric programming considering delay minimization

G. Posser, G. Flach, G. Wilke, R. Reis
{"title":"Transistor sizing and gate sizing using geometric programming considering delay minimization","authors":"G. Posser, G. Flach, G. Wilke, R. Reis","doi":"10.1109/NEWCAS.2012.6328962","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A comparison between gate sizing and transistor sizing to analyze the trade-off between execution time and minimum delay achieved is presented in this work. The transistor and gate sizing tools are based on Geometric Programming (GP) and delay is calculated using the Elmore delay model. Tests were made mapping ISCAS'85 benchmark circuits for 45nm technology considering delay minimization. First, circuits were mapped to a typical standard cell library. Then, the gate sizing and transistor sizing were performed. Gate sizing reduced the delay by 21%, in average, for a same area and power values of the sizing provided by standard-cells library. After transistor sizing reduced delay by 40.4% and power consumption by 2.9%, in average, compared with gate sizing. However, transistor sizing requires a bigger computing time, using a number of variables twice higher than with gate sizing.","PeriodicalId":122918,"journal":{"name":"10th IEEE International NEWCAS Conference","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"10th IEEE International NEWCAS Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NEWCAS.2012.6328962","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

A comparison between gate sizing and transistor sizing to analyze the trade-off between execution time and minimum delay achieved is presented in this work. The transistor and gate sizing tools are based on Geometric Programming (GP) and delay is calculated using the Elmore delay model. Tests were made mapping ISCAS'85 benchmark circuits for 45nm technology considering delay minimization. First, circuits were mapped to a typical standard cell library. Then, the gate sizing and transistor sizing were performed. Gate sizing reduced the delay by 21%, in average, for a same area and power values of the sizing provided by standard-cells library. After transistor sizing reduced delay by 40.4% and power consumption by 2.9%, in average, compared with gate sizing. However, transistor sizing requires a bigger computing time, using a number of variables twice higher than with gate sizing.
考虑延迟最小化的几何规划晶体管尺寸和栅极尺寸
通过比较栅极尺寸和晶体管尺寸来分析执行时间和最小延迟之间的权衡。晶体管和栅极尺寸工具是基于几何规划(GP)和延迟计算使用Elmore延迟模型。在考虑延迟最小化的情况下,绘制了45纳米技术的ISCAS’85基准电路进行了测试。首先,电路被映射到一个典型的标准细胞库。然后,进行了栅极尺寸和晶体管尺寸的计算。对于由标准单元库提供的相同面积和功率值的栅极尺寸,栅极尺寸平均减少了21%的延迟。与栅极尺寸相比,晶体管尺寸平均减少了40.4%的延迟和2.9%的功耗。然而,晶体管尺寸需要更大的计算时间,使用的变量数量是栅极尺寸的两倍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信