Pension Investment Funds Analysis: A Variance-Comparison Tests of Non-Contributory (Pre) and Contributory (Post) Schemes in Nigeria

E. G. Okoro, E. Okoye
{"title":"Pension Investment Funds Analysis: A Variance-Comparison Tests of Non-Contributory (Pre) and Contributory (Post) Schemes in Nigeria","authors":"E. G. Okoro, E. Okoye","doi":"10.36108/unizikjb/9102.20.0260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Nigeria, pension was established in 2004 through the Pension Reform Act, 2004 and since then, pension schemes have manifested in twofold: ‘old’ and ‘new’. The Pension Act No. 102 of 1979 is the “old pension” (non-contributory) and Pension Reform Act of 2004 (including the restructured/modified Pension Act, 2014) is the “newpension” (contributory) scheme. In this paper, we comparatively evaluated both the non-contributory (pre) and contributory (post) pension schemes in Nigeria. In order to do this, secondary data of pension investment funds was obtained during the period 1994-2014. The Variance-Comparison Tests was employed in analyzing the data so as to determine if there is a significant variation in both schemes and the test was performed via STATA 13.0. Based on the analysis of data, we found that the contributory (post) scheme is healthy, reliable and poised towards helping retirees survive as soon as they retire from service. Thus, the contributory (post) scheme significantly improved as a result of the reform in Nigeria, especially in the area of pension investment funds. On the basis of the findings, it was recommended among others that there should be an unrestricted retirement savings scheme and non-remittance of pension contributions by employers to PENCOM. Also, a better returns on investment and service delivery from pension fund administrators should be enhanced so as to enhance pension investments and voluntary contributions. Besides this, the internal procedures should be improved upon so that contributions and returns on pension investments due to retirees can be efficiently and swiftly made from pension fund administrators to pensioners on retirement.","PeriodicalId":419336,"journal":{"name":"Management of Innovation eJournal","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management of Innovation eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/unizikjb/9102.20.0260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In Nigeria, pension was established in 2004 through the Pension Reform Act, 2004 and since then, pension schemes have manifested in twofold: ‘old’ and ‘new’. The Pension Act No. 102 of 1979 is the “old pension” (non-contributory) and Pension Reform Act of 2004 (including the restructured/modified Pension Act, 2014) is the “newpension” (contributory) scheme. In this paper, we comparatively evaluated both the non-contributory (pre) and contributory (post) pension schemes in Nigeria. In order to do this, secondary data of pension investment funds was obtained during the period 1994-2014. The Variance-Comparison Tests was employed in analyzing the data so as to determine if there is a significant variation in both schemes and the test was performed via STATA 13.0. Based on the analysis of data, we found that the contributory (post) scheme is healthy, reliable and poised towards helping retirees survive as soon as they retire from service. Thus, the contributory (post) scheme significantly improved as a result of the reform in Nigeria, especially in the area of pension investment funds. On the basis of the findings, it was recommended among others that there should be an unrestricted retirement savings scheme and non-remittance of pension contributions by employers to PENCOM. Also, a better returns on investment and service delivery from pension fund administrators should be enhanced so as to enhance pension investments and voluntary contributions. Besides this, the internal procedures should be improved upon so that contributions and returns on pension investments due to retirees can be efficiently and swiftly made from pension fund administrators to pensioners on retirement.
养老金投资基金分析:尼日利亚非缴费(前期)和缴费(后期)计划的方差比较检验
在尼日利亚,养老金于2004年通过《2004年养老金改革法》设立,从那时起,养老金计划表现为两种形式:“旧”和“新”。1979年第102号《养老金法》是“旧养老金”(非缴费),2004年《养老金改革法》(包括2014年重组/修改的《养老金法》)是“新养老金”(缴费)计划。在本文中,我们比较评估了尼日利亚的非缴费(pre)和缴费(post)养老金计划。为了做到这一点,我们获得了1994-2014年期间养老金投资基金的二次数据。采用方差比较检验对数据进行分析,以确定两种方案是否存在显著差异,并通过STATA 13.0进行检验。根据对数据的分析,我们发现,缴费(岗位)计划是健康、可靠的,能够帮助退休人员在退休后尽快生存。因此,由于尼日利亚的改革,特别是在养恤金投资基金领域的改革,缴款(员额)办法有了很大的改善。根据调查结果,除其他外,有人建议应设立一个不受限制的退休储蓄计划和雇主不将养恤金缴款汇给PENCOM。此外,应提高养恤基金管理人的投资回报和提供的服务,以促进养恤基金投资和自愿捐款。除此之外,还应改进内部程序,使退休人员的养恤金投资的缴款和回报能够从养恤基金管理人向退休的养恤金领取者有效和迅速地进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信