{"title":"Restorative Justice, Social Cohesion, and Preventing and Countering Terrorism and Violent Extremism: Time for a New Zealand Praxis?","authors":"Jeremy Simons","doi":"10.36878/nsj20230329.09","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article assesses the “restorativeness” of New Zealand’s counter-terrorism approach as it is currently articulated after the 2019 Christchurch Mosque attacks. It applies a restorative lens to current policies, activities, and discussions in the New Zealand government’s efforts to implement the recommendations of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the attacks. Utilising a restorative peacebuilding lens highlights the need for further development of bicultural, binding, bonding, bridging, and linking processes to restore social cohesion and rebuild social capital in the aftermath of acts of terrorism and violent extremism. This expands the conceptualisation of restorative justice articulated in the Royal Commission of Inquiry, advocating for restorative peacebuilding as a key strategy within the broader movement for Te Tiriti-based social justice and cohesion, with Māori resistance and peace-making highlighted as critical processes. Restorative peacebuilding draws on learnings from global peacebuilding to inform Aotearoa New Zealand’s bi-cultural framework for social cohesion in response to terrorism and violent extremism. The article recommends additional conversations, initiatives, and resources enabling restorative responses to extremism and digital harm circulating in and through online-offline ecosystems.\n\nKeywords: Restorative Justice, Peace","PeriodicalId":201862,"journal":{"name":"New Zealand and Counter Terrorism Special Issue","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Zealand and Counter Terrorism Special Issue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36878/nsj20230329.09","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article assesses the “restorativeness” of New Zealand’s counter-terrorism approach as it is currently articulated after the 2019 Christchurch Mosque attacks. It applies a restorative lens to current policies, activities, and discussions in the New Zealand government’s efforts to implement the recommendations of the Royal Commission of Inquiry into the attacks. Utilising a restorative peacebuilding lens highlights the need for further development of bicultural, binding, bonding, bridging, and linking processes to restore social cohesion and rebuild social capital in the aftermath of acts of terrorism and violent extremism. This expands the conceptualisation of restorative justice articulated in the Royal Commission of Inquiry, advocating for restorative peacebuilding as a key strategy within the broader movement for Te Tiriti-based social justice and cohesion, with Māori resistance and peace-making highlighted as critical processes. Restorative peacebuilding draws on learnings from global peacebuilding to inform Aotearoa New Zealand’s bi-cultural framework for social cohesion in response to terrorism and violent extremism. The article recommends additional conversations, initiatives, and resources enabling restorative responses to extremism and digital harm circulating in and through online-offline ecosystems.
Keywords: Restorative Justice, Peace
本文评估了新西兰在2019年克赖斯特彻奇清真寺袭击事件后所阐述的反恐方法的“恢复性”。它以一种恢复性的视角,审视了新西兰政府为落实皇家调查委员会(Royal Commission of Inquiry)对袭击事件的建议而采取的现行政策、活动和讨论。利用恢复性建设和平的视角,强调需要进一步发展双文化、结合、纽带、桥梁和联系进程,以便在恐怖主义和暴力极端主义行为之后恢复社会凝聚力和重建社会资本。这扩大了皇家调查委员会所阐述的恢复性司法概念,倡导将恢复性建设和平作为更广泛的以提里提为基础的社会正义和凝聚力运动中的一项关键战略,并强调Māori抵抗和缔造和平是关键进程。恢复性建设和平借鉴了全球建设和平的经验教训,为新西兰应对恐怖主义和暴力极端主义的社会凝聚力双文化框架提供了信息。本文建议增加对话、倡议和资源,以便对在线-离线生态系统中传播的极端主义和数字危害做出恢复性反应。关键词:恢复性司法;和平