Adolescent views of mental illness stigma: An intersectional lens.

Melissa J. DuPont-Reyes, A. Villatoro, J. Phelan, Kris Painter, Bruce G. Link
{"title":"Adolescent views of mental illness stigma: An intersectional lens.","authors":"Melissa J. DuPont-Reyes, A. Villatoro, J. Phelan, Kris Painter, Bruce G. Link","doi":"10.1037/ort0000425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Differences in mental illness (MI) stigma among adolescents were examined cross-sectionally across race, ethnicity, and gender to identify target populations and cultural considerations for future antistigma efforts. An ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of sixth graders (N = 667; mean age = 11.5) self-completed assessments of their MI-related knowledge, positive attitudes, and behaviors toward peers with MI and adolescent vignettes described as experiencing bipolar (Julia) and social anxiety (David) symptoms. Self-reported race, ethnicity, and gender were combined to generate 6 intersectional composite variables: Latino boys, Latina girls, non-Latina/o (NL) Black boys, NL-Black girls, NL-White boys, and NL-White girls-referent. Linear regression models adjusting for personal and family factors examined differences in stigma using separate and composite race, ethnicity, and gender variables. In main effects models, boys and Latina/o adolescents reported greater stigma for some outcomes than girls and NL-White adolescents, respectively. However, intersectional analyses revealed unique patterns. NL-Black boys reported less knowledge/positive attitudes than NL-Black and White girls. NL-Black and Latino boys reported greater avoidance/discomfort than NL-White girls. Moreover, NL-Black girls and boys and Latina/o girls and boys wanted more social separation from peers with mental illness than NL-White girls; NL-Black boys also reported more separation than NL-White boys, NL-Black girls, and Latina girls. Finally, NL-Black boys and Latina girls wanted more distance from David than NL-White and Black girls. Vital for informing future antistigma interventions, this study generates new knowledge about how differences in views about MI exist across racial and ethnic identity, and how gender intersects with these perceptions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).","PeriodicalId":409666,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of orthopsychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/ort0000425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Differences in mental illness (MI) stigma among adolescents were examined cross-sectionally across race, ethnicity, and gender to identify target populations and cultural considerations for future antistigma efforts. An ethnically and socioeconomically diverse sample of sixth graders (N = 667; mean age = 11.5) self-completed assessments of their MI-related knowledge, positive attitudes, and behaviors toward peers with MI and adolescent vignettes described as experiencing bipolar (Julia) and social anxiety (David) symptoms. Self-reported race, ethnicity, and gender were combined to generate 6 intersectional composite variables: Latino boys, Latina girls, non-Latina/o (NL) Black boys, NL-Black girls, NL-White boys, and NL-White girls-referent. Linear regression models adjusting for personal and family factors examined differences in stigma using separate and composite race, ethnicity, and gender variables. In main effects models, boys and Latina/o adolescents reported greater stigma for some outcomes than girls and NL-White adolescents, respectively. However, intersectional analyses revealed unique patterns. NL-Black boys reported less knowledge/positive attitudes than NL-Black and White girls. NL-Black and Latino boys reported greater avoidance/discomfort than NL-White girls. Moreover, NL-Black girls and boys and Latina/o girls and boys wanted more social separation from peers with mental illness than NL-White girls; NL-Black boys also reported more separation than NL-White boys, NL-Black girls, and Latina girls. Finally, NL-Black boys and Latina girls wanted more distance from David than NL-White and Black girls. Vital for informing future antistigma interventions, this study generates new knowledge about how differences in views about MI exist across racial and ethnic identity, and how gender intersects with these perceptions. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).
青少年对精神疾病污名的看法:一个交叉镜头。
跨种族、民族和性别对青少年精神疾病(MI)病耻感的差异进行了横断面研究,以确定目标人群和文化因素,为未来的反病耻感工作提供参考。种族和社会经济多样化的六年级学生样本(N = 667;平均年龄= 11.5岁)自我完成的MI相关知识、积极态度和对MI同伴的行为的评估,以及被描述为经历双相情感障碍(Julia)和社交焦虑(David)症状的青少年小故事。自我报告的种族、民族和性别相结合产生6个交叉复合变量:拉丁裔男孩、拉丁裔女孩、非拉丁裔/非黑人男孩、非拉丁裔-黑人女孩、非拉丁裔-白人男孩和非拉丁裔-白人女孩。调整了个人和家庭因素的线性回归模型使用单独的和复合的种族、民族和性别变量检验了病耻感的差异。在主要效应模型中,男孩和拉丁裔/非拉丁裔青少年分别比女孩和非白人青少年报告了更大的耻辱感。然而,交叉分析揭示了独特的模式。非裔黑人男孩比非裔黑人和白人女孩报告的知识/积极态度更少。非裔黑人和拉丁裔男孩比非裔白人女孩报告更多的回避/不适。此外,非裔黑人女孩和男孩以及拉丁裔/非裔女孩和男孩比非裔白人女孩更希望与患有精神疾病的同龄人进行社会隔离;非裔黑人男孩也比非裔白人男孩、非裔黑人女孩和拉丁裔女孩报告更多的分离。最后,非裔黑人男孩和拉丁裔女孩比非裔白人和黑人女孩更希望与大卫保持距离。这项研究为未来的反污名化干预提供了至关重要的信息,它提供了关于不同种族和民族身份对MI看法差异的新知识,以及性别如何与这些看法交叉。(PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2019 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信