Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Amin Saberi, Mehrdad Gazanchian, R. Sadeghi, A. Eshraghi
{"title":"Platelet-To-Lymphocyte Ratio as a Predictor of No-Reflow after Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis","authors":"Amin Saberi, Mehrdad Gazanchian, R. Sadeghi, A. Eshraghi","doi":"10.22038/JCTM.2019.39393.1219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: No-reflow increases the complications and mortality rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it is important to identify patients at a higher risk of developing no-reflow. This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to predict no-reflow. Materials and Methods: The databases, such as Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge were searched for the relevant studies. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. In this meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity of PLR, as well as the pooled odds ratio were calculated to predict no-reflow and compared with the pooled means of PLR in no-reflow and reflow groups. Results: According to the results obtained from six out of eight studies in this systematic review, there was a significant association between PLR and no-reflow. Moreover, a pooled six-fold increase of no-reflow risk was observed in the high PLR group. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PLR to predict no-reflow was 65% (CI95%: 61%-69%) and 77% (CI95%: 76%-79%), respectively. The mean pooled of PLR in the no-reflow group was significantly 65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8) units higher than that in the reflow group. Conclusions: The PLR is a significant predictor of no-reflow in STEMI patients subjected to primary PCI which can be used alone or in combination with other markers to identify patients at higher risk of developing no-reflow.","PeriodicalId":131413,"journal":{"name":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"journal of cardio-thoracic medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/JCTM.2019.39393.1219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: No-reflow increases the complications and mortality rate of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Therefore, it is important to identify patients at a higher risk of developing no-reflow. This study aimed to systematically review the prognostic value of the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) to predict no-reflow. Materials and Methods: The databases, such as Pubmed, EMBASE, and Web of Knowledge were searched for the relevant studies. Two authors independently performed data extraction and quality assessment of the included studies. In this meta-analysis, sensitivity and specificity of PLR, as well as the pooled odds ratio were calculated to predict no-reflow and compared with the pooled means of PLR in no-reflow and reflow groups. Results: According to the results obtained from six out of eight studies in this systematic review, there was a significant association between PLR and no-reflow. Moreover, a pooled six-fold increase of no-reflow risk was observed in the high PLR group. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of PLR to predict no-reflow was 65% (CI95%: 61%-69%) and 77% (CI95%: 76%-79%), respectively. The mean pooled of PLR in the no-reflow group was significantly 65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8) units higher than that in the reflow group. Conclusions: The PLR is a significant predictor of no-reflow in STEMI patients subjected to primary PCI which can be used alone or in combination with other markers to identify patients at higher risk of developing no-reflow.
血小板与淋巴细胞比值作为ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后无再流的预测指标:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析
无再流增加了经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的并发症和死亡率。因此,鉴别出无血流倒流风险较高的患者是很重要的。本研究旨在系统回顾血小板与淋巴细胞比率(PLR)在预测无血流的预后价值。材料与方法:检索Pubmed、EMBASE、Web of Knowledge等数据库进行相关研究。两位作者独立进行了纳入研究的数据提取和质量评估。在本荟萃分析中,计算PLR的敏感性和特异性,以及合并优势比来预测无再流,并与无再流组和再流组PLR的合并平均值进行比较。结果:根据本系统综述中8项研究中6项的结果,PLR和无血流倒流之间存在显著关联。此外,在高PLR组中观察到无再流风险增加了6倍。PLR预测无血流再流的敏感性和特异性分别为65% (CI95%: 61%-69%)和77% (CI95%: 76%-79%)。无血流灌注组PLR平均池比血流灌注组高65.2 (CI95%: 26.7-103.8)个单位。结论:PLR是STEMI患者行首次PCI后无血流循环的重要预测指标,可单独使用或与其他标志物联合使用,以识别无血流循环风险较高的患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信