Temptation and Unethical Activities: A Study on Malaysian Students’ Behaviour

M. Nor, N. Amran
{"title":"Temptation and Unethical Activities: A Study on Malaysian Students’ Behaviour","authors":"M. Nor, N. Amran","doi":"10.37934/arbms.19.1.1528","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study compares the differences among students on the influence of temptation and the acts of misconduct that they might commit. Several students’ characteristics were employed to examine the differences in terms of the possibility of the students to commit unethical activities. A three-section questionnaire was distributed to students from October 2019 to November 2019. A total of 319 accounting students from Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) were involved in this study. For data analysis, descriptive and comparative analyses were utilised. The comparative analysis looked into the differences in terms of demographic (gender and ethnicity) and academic (year of study and academic programme) factors. The descriptive analysis reveals that there is a possibility of students being involved in an unethical behaviour when they are tempted and the intention to be involved in that behaviour is generally low. Based on the comparative analysis, this study reveals that the most significant difference arises for the demographic factor, i.e., gender. The comparative analysis for academic programmes reveals there are not many significant differences among students in the case of becoming involved in an unethical activity when tempted and intention to commit unethical behaviour. The results may give some insights to relevant authorities, such as the Ministry of Education, regulators, business owners and the public at large, on current students’ intentions and behaviour. It might be useful to the relevant authorities to start thinking of and developing appropriate fraud prevention mechanisms.","PeriodicalId":143359,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Advanced Research in Business and Management Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37934/arbms.19.1.1528","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study compares the differences among students on the influence of temptation and the acts of misconduct that they might commit. Several students’ characteristics were employed to examine the differences in terms of the possibility of the students to commit unethical activities. A three-section questionnaire was distributed to students from October 2019 to November 2019. A total of 319 accounting students from Universiti Utara Malaysia (UUM) were involved in this study. For data analysis, descriptive and comparative analyses were utilised. The comparative analysis looked into the differences in terms of demographic (gender and ethnicity) and academic (year of study and academic programme) factors. The descriptive analysis reveals that there is a possibility of students being involved in an unethical behaviour when they are tempted and the intention to be involved in that behaviour is generally low. Based on the comparative analysis, this study reveals that the most significant difference arises for the demographic factor, i.e., gender. The comparative analysis for academic programmes reveals there are not many significant differences among students in the case of becoming involved in an unethical activity when tempted and intention to commit unethical behaviour. The results may give some insights to relevant authorities, such as the Ministry of Education, regulators, business owners and the public at large, on current students’ intentions and behaviour. It might be useful to the relevant authorities to start thinking of and developing appropriate fraud prevention mechanisms.
诱惑与不道德行为:马来西亚学生行为研究
这项研究比较了学生对诱惑的影响和他们可能犯下的不当行为的差异。几个学生的特征被用来检验学生从事不道德活动的可能性方面的差异。从2019年10月至2019年11月,向学生发放了一份分为三部分的调查问卷。共有319名来自马来西亚北方大学(UUM)的会计专业学生参与了这项研究。数据分析采用描述性和比较性分析。比较分析着眼于人口(性别和种族)和学术(学习年份和学术课程)因素方面的差异。描述性分析表明,当学生受到诱惑时,他们有可能参与不道德的行为,而参与这种行为的意图通常较低。在比较分析的基础上,本研究发现,最显著的差异出现在人口因素,即性别。对学术课程的比较分析表明,在受到不道德行为的诱惑和意图参与不道德活动的情况下,学生之间并没有太大的差异。研究结果可能会给相关部门,如教育部、监管机构、企业主和广大公众,提供一些关于当前学生意图和行为的见解。有关当局开始考虑和制定适当的防止欺诈机制可能是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信