Peritoneal Lavage with Antiseptics in the Management of Peritonitis in Patients with Perforated Duodenal Ulcer

Md. Jafrul Islam, A. Hossain, Md. Majedul Islam, Md. Alamgir Hossain, Md Mizanur Rahman, K. Uddin, Md Nasir Uddin, N. Mahbub
{"title":"Peritoneal Lavage with Antiseptics in the Management of Peritonitis in Patients with Perforated Duodenal Ulcer","authors":"Md. Jafrul Islam, A. Hossain, Md. Majedul Islam, Md. Alamgir Hossain, Md Mizanur Rahman, K. Uddin, Md Nasir Uddin, N. Mahbub","doi":"10.3329/jmomc.v8i2.64437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background : Postoperative wound infection is a common consequence following laparotomy for peritonitis. Peptic ulcer perforation followed by peritonitis remains as an important cause of mortality. In severe peritonitis, the use of exploratory laparotomy and intra-operative lavage with large amount of saline solution has been the standard of care to reduce risk of postoperative infections.\nObjective: To compare the outcome between povidone iodine mixed normal saline (N/S) lavage and conventional normal saline lavage in the management of peritonitis in a tertiary care public hospital in Bangladesh.\nMethodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the department of Surgery, Shaheed Ziaur Rahman Medical College Hospital, Bogura during July 2013 to December 2013. There were total 50 patients, selected by purposive sampling as a diagnosed case of peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation. All the patients were divided into 2 groups by using coin toss as group A (conventional N/S) and group B (povidone iodine mixed with N/S). The data were collected using the pretested data collection sheet. Results were tested by chi-square test to see their level of significance with a p-value at <0.05.\nResults: The maximum (17, 34.0%) patients presented as peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation was from 18-30 years age group. The mean age of the patient was 29.16±9.25 years (age range: 18-61 years). The female to male ratio were 5.25:1 and 3.16:1 in group A and B respectively. Some (22, 44.0%) of the patients showed 13-18 hours delay since first symptom appeared. Fever (88.0% vs 80.0%), surgical site infection (SSI) (32.0% vs 24.0%), burst abdomen (20.0% vs 12.0%), intra-abdominal sepsis (8.0% vs 4.0%) were evident as postoperative complications in the groups A and B respectively. Only 1 (4.0%) patient died among group A patients due to sudden cardiac arrest. Mean hospital stay was a little lower among group B patients with milder complications and good outcome (though difference was not statistically significant).\nConclusion: The outcome was observed better in case of using povidone iodine mixed with normal saline for peritoneal lavage.\nJ Monno Med Coll June 2022;8(2): 36-39","PeriodicalId":153122,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Monno Medical College","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Monno Medical College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/jmomc.v8i2.64437","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background : Postoperative wound infection is a common consequence following laparotomy for peritonitis. Peptic ulcer perforation followed by peritonitis remains as an important cause of mortality. In severe peritonitis, the use of exploratory laparotomy and intra-operative lavage with large amount of saline solution has been the standard of care to reduce risk of postoperative infections. Objective: To compare the outcome between povidone iodine mixed normal saline (N/S) lavage and conventional normal saline lavage in the management of peritonitis in a tertiary care public hospital in Bangladesh. Methodology: This was a randomized clinical trial conducted in the department of Surgery, Shaheed Ziaur Rahman Medical College Hospital, Bogura during July 2013 to December 2013. There were total 50 patients, selected by purposive sampling as a diagnosed case of peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation. All the patients were divided into 2 groups by using coin toss as group A (conventional N/S) and group B (povidone iodine mixed with N/S). The data were collected using the pretested data collection sheet. Results were tested by chi-square test to see their level of significance with a p-value at <0.05. Results: The maximum (17, 34.0%) patients presented as peritonitis due to peptic ulcer perforation was from 18-30 years age group. The mean age of the patient was 29.16±9.25 years (age range: 18-61 years). The female to male ratio were 5.25:1 and 3.16:1 in group A and B respectively. Some (22, 44.0%) of the patients showed 13-18 hours delay since first symptom appeared. Fever (88.0% vs 80.0%), surgical site infection (SSI) (32.0% vs 24.0%), burst abdomen (20.0% vs 12.0%), intra-abdominal sepsis (8.0% vs 4.0%) were evident as postoperative complications in the groups A and B respectively. Only 1 (4.0%) patient died among group A patients due to sudden cardiac arrest. Mean hospital stay was a little lower among group B patients with milder complications and good outcome (though difference was not statistically significant). Conclusion: The outcome was observed better in case of using povidone iodine mixed with normal saline for peritoneal lavage. J Monno Med Coll June 2022;8(2): 36-39
抗菌药物腹腔灌洗治疗十二指肠溃疡穿孔患者腹膜炎的疗效观察
背景:术后伤口感染是腹膜炎剖腹手术后常见的后果。消化性溃疡穿孔继发腹膜炎仍然是导致死亡的重要原因。在严重腹膜炎中,采用剖腹探查和术中大量生理盐水灌洗已成为降低术后感染风险的标准护理方法。目的:比较聚维酮碘混合生理盐水(N/S)灌洗与常规生理盐水灌洗在孟加拉国某三级公立医院治疗腹膜炎中的效果。方法:这是一项随机临床试验,于2013年7月至2013年12月在Bogura Shaheed Ziaur Rahman医学院医院外科进行。通过有目的的抽样,选取确诊为消化性溃疡穿孔所致腹膜炎的患者共50例。采用抛硬币法将患者分为两组:A组(常规N/S)和B组(聚维酮碘与N/S混合)。使用预测试的数据收集表收集数据。结果采用卡方检验,p值<0.05。结果:18 ~ 30岁年龄组以消化性溃疡穿孔所致腹膜炎发生率最高(17.34.0%)。患者平均年龄29.16±9.25岁(年龄18-61岁)。A、B组男女比例分别为5.25∶1和3.16∶1。约22.44.0%的患者自首次出现症状后延迟13 ~ 18小时。A组和B组的术后并发症分别为发热(88.0% vs 80.0%)、手术部位感染(32.0% vs 24.0%)、腹裂(20.0% vs 12.0%)、腹腔脓毒症(8.0% vs 4.0%)。A组患者中仅有1例(4.0%)死于心脏骤停。B组患者的平均住院时间稍短,并发症较轻,预后较好(但差异无统计学意义)。结论:聚维酮碘与生理盐水混合用于腹腔灌洗效果较好。中华医科大学学报(自然科学版);2009;8(2):36-39
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信