Bank Monitoring and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from a Natural Experiment

Minwen Li, Tanakorn Makaew, Andrew Winton
{"title":"Bank Monitoring and Corporate Fraud: Evidence from a Natural Experiment","authors":"Minwen Li, Tanakorn Makaew, Andrew Winton","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2521151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We find that financial misreporting in China is less likely if a firm’s province is more financially developed, if its largest shareholder holds more shares, or if the firm is in a government-supported industry, and more likely if the firm is connected to the market regulator. Many conventional Western governance mechanisms do not affect the incidence of misreporting. Natural experiments using two recent reforms support causal effects of financial development and blockholdings on misreporting. We also find that financial development reduces the frequency of tunneling and insider trading, but ownership structure has differing effects on these two types of fraud.","PeriodicalId":379282,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Governance & Institutional Change (Topic)","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Empirical Studies of Governance & Institutional Change (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2521151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

We find that financial misreporting in China is less likely if a firm’s province is more financially developed, if its largest shareholder holds more shares, or if the firm is in a government-supported industry, and more likely if the firm is connected to the market regulator. Many conventional Western governance mechanisms do not affect the incidence of misreporting. Natural experiments using two recent reforms support causal effects of financial development and blockholdings on misreporting. We also find that financial development reduces the frequency of tunneling and insider trading, but ownership structure has differing effects on these two types of fraud.
银行监控与公司欺诈:来自自然实验的证据
我们发现,在中国,如果一家公司所在的省份金融更发达,如果其最大股东持有更多股份,或者该公司处于政府支持的行业,那么该公司不太可能出现财务误报,而如果该公司与市场监管机构有联系,则更有可能出现财务误报。许多传统的西方治理机制并不能影响误报的发生率。利用最近的两项改革进行的自然实验支持金融发展和控股对误报的因果效应。我们还发现,金融发展降低了隧道交易和内幕交易的频率,但所有权结构对这两种欺诈类型的影响不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信