Power, Politics and Children’s Citizenship: The Silencing of Civil Society

A. Osler, Aya Kato
{"title":"Power, Politics and Children’s Citizenship: The Silencing of Civil Society","authors":"A. Osler, Aya Kato","doi":"10.1163/15718182-30020007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nChildren remain marginalised in theoretical analyses of citizenship and political rights, with their partial citizenship status attracting minimal attention. We consider the ontological need for political engagement, children’s political agency and intergenerational justice. We discuss how Derrida’s hospitality concept may inform analyses of power structures that serve to exclude children from the demos. We then examine the case of Japan where education law neglects children’s political rights, though respect for human rights and popular sovereignty are core constitutional values. Analysis of parliamentary debates addressing Article 12 and children’s right to be heard and organise collectively reveals a long-standing ideological divide concerning children’s political participation. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has explained Japan’s reluctance to implement Article 12 as reflecting “traditional” attitudes. The reality is more complex. From the late 1950s, Japan experienced a wave of student-led protests, focusing on the US-Japan Anpo Security Treaty. Subsequently, the Japanese government prioritised public order over students’ political rights, and global economic competitiveness over citizenship rights. Article 12 remains a site of struggle between those wishing to extend children’s citizenship rights and those who wish to maintain their partial citizenship, fearing social unrest and a focus away from global economic competitiveness.","PeriodicalId":217193,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Children’s Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15718182-30020007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Children remain marginalised in theoretical analyses of citizenship and political rights, with their partial citizenship status attracting minimal attention. We consider the ontological need for political engagement, children’s political agency and intergenerational justice. We discuss how Derrida’s hospitality concept may inform analyses of power structures that serve to exclude children from the demos. We then examine the case of Japan where education law neglects children’s political rights, though respect for human rights and popular sovereignty are core constitutional values. Analysis of parliamentary debates addressing Article 12 and children’s right to be heard and organise collectively reveals a long-standing ideological divide concerning children’s political participation. The Committee on the Rights of the Child has explained Japan’s reluctance to implement Article 12 as reflecting “traditional” attitudes. The reality is more complex. From the late 1950s, Japan experienced a wave of student-led protests, focusing on the US-Japan Anpo Security Treaty. Subsequently, the Japanese government prioritised public order over students’ political rights, and global economic competitiveness over citizenship rights. Article 12 remains a site of struggle between those wishing to extend children’s citizenship rights and those who wish to maintain their partial citizenship, fearing social unrest and a focus away from global economic competitiveness.
权力、政治与儿童公民身份:公民社会的沉默
在关于公民身份和政治权利的理论分析中,儿童仍然被边缘化,他们的部分公民身份很少引起注意。我们考虑政治参与的本体论需要,儿童的政治代理和代际正义。我们将讨论德里达的好客概念如何为将儿童排除在大众之外的权力结构分析提供信息。然后,我们考察了日本的案例,尽管尊重人权和人民主权是核心的宪法价值,但日本的教育法忽视了儿童的政治权利。对议会关于第12条和儿童发表意见和集体组织权利的辩论的分析表明,在儿童政治参与方面存在长期存在的意识形态分歧。儿童权利委员会解释说,日本不愿执行第12条反映了“传统”态度。现实情况要复杂得多。从20世纪50年代末开始,日本经历了一波以学生为主导的抗议浪潮,重点是《美日安保条约》(US-Japan Anpo Security Treaty)。随后,日本政府将公共秩序置于学生的政治权利之上,将全球经济竞争力置于公民权利之上。第12条仍然是希望扩大儿童公民权的人和希望保留部分公民权的人之间斗争的场所,他们担心社会动荡和焦点远离全球经济竞争力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信