Comparison of the People’s Republic of China and The Republic of Cuba: Constitutional Systems and Changes in the New Order

Umut Turgut Yildirim
{"title":"Comparison of the People’s Republic of China and The Republic of Cuba: Constitutional Systems and Changes in the New Order","authors":"Umut Turgut Yildirim","doi":"10.33712/mana.1102038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Thanks to the establishment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) at the beginning of the 20th century and its importance in the Cold War period, socialist ideals and socialism have become one of our recent history's most popular philosophies. Therefore, socialism has expanded its influence throughout the world. During this period, several countries in East Asia, Europe, and South America have adopted socialism/communism in the building process of their political regimes. However, after the dissolution of the USSR in the early 1990s, several changes and developments took place both in the international order and in most socialist countries in political, economic, and social terms. In most of these socialist countries, which were formerly opposed to capitalism and liberalism, there has been a transition to capitalism, especially with regard to their understanding of the economy. Despite the changes, socialist/communist ideas, values, and practices maintained their legitimacy in their political regimes. The People's Republic of China and the Republic of Cuba are the two countries that the study focuses on in the context of this continuity and change. The study comparatively examines the transition process of the China and Cuba to the socialist system; the political structures established after the socialist revolution; the changes in the two countries after the decline of socialism. The study based on the qualitative research methods. The central thesis of this study is that the political structure of both countries has not moved away from the order envisaged by the socialist system and that their understanding of the economy has gradually transformed to include capitalist mechanisms and practices. Finally, the main argument of this study is that China and Cuba have preserved most of the conventional structure of their political system, while their economies are on the way to adapting to the international capitalist economy.","PeriodicalId":112131,"journal":{"name":"Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Uluslararası Yönetim Akademisi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33712/mana.1102038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thanks to the establishment of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) at the beginning of the 20th century and its importance in the Cold War period, socialist ideals and socialism have become one of our recent history's most popular philosophies. Therefore, socialism has expanded its influence throughout the world. During this period, several countries in East Asia, Europe, and South America have adopted socialism/communism in the building process of their political regimes. However, after the dissolution of the USSR in the early 1990s, several changes and developments took place both in the international order and in most socialist countries in political, economic, and social terms. In most of these socialist countries, which were formerly opposed to capitalism and liberalism, there has been a transition to capitalism, especially with regard to their understanding of the economy. Despite the changes, socialist/communist ideas, values, and practices maintained their legitimacy in their political regimes. The People's Republic of China and the Republic of Cuba are the two countries that the study focuses on in the context of this continuity and change. The study comparatively examines the transition process of the China and Cuba to the socialist system; the political structures established after the socialist revolution; the changes in the two countries after the decline of socialism. The study based on the qualitative research methods. The central thesis of this study is that the political structure of both countries has not moved away from the order envisaged by the socialist system and that their understanding of the economy has gradually transformed to include capitalist mechanisms and practices. Finally, the main argument of this study is that China and Cuba have preserved most of the conventional structure of their political system, while their economies are on the way to adapting to the international capitalist economy.
中华人民共和国和古巴共和国的比较:宪法制度和新秩序的变化
由于20世纪初苏维埃社会主义共和国联盟(苏联)的建立及其在冷战时期的重要性,社会主义理想和社会主义已经成为我们近代史上最受欢迎的哲学之一。因此,社会主义在全世界的影响扩大了。在此期间,东亚、欧洲和南美的一些国家在其政权建设过程中采用了社会主义/共产主义。然而,在20世纪90年代初苏联解体后,国际秩序和大多数社会主义国家在政治、经济和社会方面都发生了一些变化和发展。在这些以前反对资本主义和自由主义的社会主义国家中,大多数国家已经向资本主义过渡,特别是在他们对经济的理解方面。尽管发生了这些变化,社会主义/共产主义思想、价值观和实践在他们的政治制度中保持了合法性。中华人民共和国和古巴共和国是本研究报告在这种连续性和变化的背景下重点关注的两个国家。本研究比较考察了中国和古巴向社会主义制度过渡的过程;社会主义革命后建立的政治体制;社会主义衰落后两国的变化。本研究采用定性研究方法。本研究的中心论点是,两国的政治结构都没有偏离社会主义制度所设想的秩序,它们对经济的理解也逐渐转变为包括资本主义机制和实践。最后,本研究的主要论点是,中国和古巴保留了其政治制度的大部分传统结构,而其经济正在适应国际资本主义经济。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信