Evaluating the Penetration of Capitalism in Post-Socialist Ukraine

Colin Williams, J. Round
{"title":"Evaluating the Penetration of Capitalism in Post-Socialist Ukraine","authors":"Colin Williams, J. Round","doi":"10.1108/01443580710823220","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate critically the meta-narrative that capitalism is becoming totalising and hegemonic. Grounded in an emerging corpus of post-development thought that has deconstructed this discourse in relation to western economies and the majority (third) world, the purpose of this paper is to further contribute to this burgeoning critique by analysing the degree to which capitalism has penetrated a post-socialist society, namely Ukraine. Design/methodology/approach - To analyse the penetration of capitalism, a survey is reported of the work practices of 600 households in a array of localities in Ukraine, conducted during 2005/2006 using face-to-face interviews. Findings - Analysing the practices used by households to secure their livelihoods, the finding is that capitalism is far from hegemonic. Even when the formal economy is relied on either as their most important or second most important source of livelihood, it is nearly always combined with some other economic activity. A diverse portfolio of work practices is thus the norm rather than the exception with over 90 per cent of households relying on sources other than the formal market sphere as either their most important or second most important source of livelihood. Practical implications - Displaying the shallow penetration of capitalism in this array of localities in Ukraine, this paper reveals the need for a re-representation of the realities of work in such post-socialist societies so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative futures for work. Originality/value - This paper reports the first evaluation of the extent to which capitalism has penetrated work practices in post-socialist Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":208075,"journal":{"name":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PRN: Distributive & Economic Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/01443580710823220","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to evaluate critically the meta-narrative that capitalism is becoming totalising and hegemonic. Grounded in an emerging corpus of post-development thought that has deconstructed this discourse in relation to western economies and the majority (third) world, the purpose of this paper is to further contribute to this burgeoning critique by analysing the degree to which capitalism has penetrated a post-socialist society, namely Ukraine. Design/methodology/approach - To analyse the penetration of capitalism, a survey is reported of the work practices of 600 households in a array of localities in Ukraine, conducted during 2005/2006 using face-to-face interviews. Findings - Analysing the practices used by households to secure their livelihoods, the finding is that capitalism is far from hegemonic. Even when the formal economy is relied on either as their most important or second most important source of livelihood, it is nearly always combined with some other economic activity. A diverse portfolio of work practices is thus the norm rather than the exception with over 90 per cent of households relying on sources other than the formal market sphere as either their most important or second most important source of livelihood. Practical implications - Displaying the shallow penetration of capitalism in this array of localities in Ukraine, this paper reveals the need for a re-representation of the realities of work in such post-socialist societies so as to open up the feasibility of, and possibilities for, alternative futures for work. Originality/value - This paper reports the first evaluation of the extent to which capitalism has penetrated work practices in post-socialist Ukraine.
评价后社会主义乌克兰的资本主义渗透
目的-本文的目的是批判性地评估资本主义正在成为极权主义和霸权主义的元叙事。基于新兴的后发展思想语料库,解构了与西方经济体和大多数(第三)世界有关的这种话语,本文的目的是通过分析资本主义渗透到后社会主义社会(即乌克兰)的程度,进一步促进这种新兴的批评。设计/方法/方法-为了分析资本主义的渗透,报告了2005/2006年期间对乌克兰一系列地区600个家庭的工作实践进行的面对面访谈调查。研究结果——分析了家庭保障生计的做法,发现资本主义远非霸权主义。即使当正式经济被视为他们最重要或第二重要的生计来源时,它也几乎总是与其他一些经济活动结合在一起。因此,工作实践的多样化组合是常态,而不是例外,90%以上的家庭依靠正规市场领域以外的来源作为其最重要或第二重要的生计来源。实际意义-展示资本主义在乌克兰这一系列地区的浅层渗透,本文揭示了在这种后社会主义社会中重新代表工作现实的必要性,以便开辟工作替代未来的可行性和可能性。原创性/价值-本文报告了对资本主义渗透到后社会主义乌克兰工作实践程度的首次评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信