Determinants of Vertical and Horizontal Export Diversification: Evidences from Sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia

A. Mengistu
{"title":"Determinants of Vertical and Horizontal Export Diversification: Evidences from Sub-Saharan Africa and East Asia","authors":"A. Mengistu","doi":"10.4314/EJE.V17I2.47311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper analyzes the main determinants of vertical and horizontal export diversification based on a balanced panel data for 41 countries from SSA and East Asia over the period 1975-2004; using FGLS estimation methods with corrected heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. The results reveal that education, health, and income per capita, population size, infrastructural development and openness are crucial factors to induce vertical as well as horizontal export diversification. FDI was found to be a key factor to speed-up vertical and horizontal export diversification in East Asia, but only for vertical diversification in SSA. The elasticity’s of human capital and FDI were much higher in East Asia than SSA. The intuition is that East Asian countries have devoted significant amount of investment on education, health, infrastructure and these in turn created a better conducive atmosphere for FDI inflow. The study also reveals domestic investment plays an important role to enhance vertical as well as horizontal export diversification for East Asia, while it only induces horizontal diversification for SSA. While ‘arable land’ resource has a positive and significant effect on vertical and horizontal diversification, ‘oil’ wealth was found to be negatively associated with export diversification. This implies that not all types of natural resource endowment have a ‘Dutch disease’ effect. While inflation, exchange rate, and foreign aid variables have a mixed effect on vertical and horizontal export diversification, political instability however has a strong adverse effect on export diversification; especially for SSA. The key lesson from East Asia to SSA is that investment on human capital and physical infrastructure through foreign investment as well as domestic capital formation are key ingredients, as are stable macro-economic and political environment, a stable and flexible exchange rate, and a fair and an open trading framework in order to accelerate vertical and horizontal export diversification and ultimately promote structural change on the economy. In line with this, SSA countries should follow a dual strategy of vertical and horizontal export diversification, mainly by supporting backward and forward linkages into higher value-added resource-based industries and gradually shift production and exports from customary products to more dynamic ones by developing competitive advantage in the world market.","PeriodicalId":307872,"journal":{"name":"Ethiopian Journal of Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethiopian Journal of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/EJE.V17I2.47311","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This paper analyzes the main determinants of vertical and horizontal export diversification based on a balanced panel data for 41 countries from SSA and East Asia over the period 1975-2004; using FGLS estimation methods with corrected heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation. The results reveal that education, health, and income per capita, population size, infrastructural development and openness are crucial factors to induce vertical as well as horizontal export diversification. FDI was found to be a key factor to speed-up vertical and horizontal export diversification in East Asia, but only for vertical diversification in SSA. The elasticity’s of human capital and FDI were much higher in East Asia than SSA. The intuition is that East Asian countries have devoted significant amount of investment on education, health, infrastructure and these in turn created a better conducive atmosphere for FDI inflow. The study also reveals domestic investment plays an important role to enhance vertical as well as horizontal export diversification for East Asia, while it only induces horizontal diversification for SSA. While ‘arable land’ resource has a positive and significant effect on vertical and horizontal diversification, ‘oil’ wealth was found to be negatively associated with export diversification. This implies that not all types of natural resource endowment have a ‘Dutch disease’ effect. While inflation, exchange rate, and foreign aid variables have a mixed effect on vertical and horizontal export diversification, political instability however has a strong adverse effect on export diversification; especially for SSA. The key lesson from East Asia to SSA is that investment on human capital and physical infrastructure through foreign investment as well as domestic capital formation are key ingredients, as are stable macro-economic and political environment, a stable and flexible exchange rate, and a fair and an open trading framework in order to accelerate vertical and horizontal export diversification and ultimately promote structural change on the economy. In line with this, SSA countries should follow a dual strategy of vertical and horizontal export diversification, mainly by supporting backward and forward linkages into higher value-added resource-based industries and gradually shift production and exports from customary products to more dynamic ones by developing competitive advantage in the world market.
纵向和横向出口多样化的决定因素:来自撒哈拉以南非洲和东亚的证据
本文基于1975-2004年东亚和南亚41个国家的均衡面板数据,分析了出口纵向和横向多样化的主要影响因素;采用校正异方差和自相关的FGLS估计方法。结果表明,教育、卫生、人均收入、人口规模、基础设施发展和开放程度是导致出口纵向和横向多样化的关键因素。研究发现,FDI是加速东亚地区出口纵向和横向多样化的关键因素,但仅对南亚地区的出口纵向多样化有效。东亚地区的人力资本弹性和FDI弹性明显高于南亚地区。直觉是,东亚国家在教育、卫生和基础设施方面投入了大量投资,这些投资反过来又为外国直接投资流入创造了更好的有利环境。研究还发现,国内投资对促进东亚出口纵向多元化和横向多元化都有重要作用,而国内投资仅对东亚出口横向多元化起诱导作用。虽然“耕地”资源对垂直和水平多样化具有积极和显著的影响,但“石油”财富与出口多样化呈负相关。这意味着并非所有类型的自然资源禀赋都具有“荷兰病”效应。通货膨胀、汇率和外援变量对出口多样化的纵向和横向影响是混合的,但政治不稳定对出口多样化有强烈的不利影响;特别是对于SSA。从东亚到南南亚的主要教训是,通过外国投资和国内资本形成对人力资本和有形基础设施的投资是关键因素,稳定的宏观经济和政治环境、稳定和灵活的汇率、公平和开放的贸易框架也是关键因素,以加速纵向和横向出口多样化,并最终促进经济结构变革。根据这一点,南非洲国家应遵循纵向和横向出口多样化的双重战略,主要是通过支持向后和向前联系到高附加值的资源型工业,并通过在世界市场上发展竞争优势,逐步将生产和出口从习惯产品转向更有活力的产品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书