Speech Remediation of a Long-Term Stutter: A Case Study

B. McMicken, Margaret Vento-Wilson
{"title":"Speech Remediation of a Long-Term Stutter: A Case Study","authors":"B. McMicken, Margaret Vento-Wilson","doi":"10.4172/2375-4427.1000119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This research article describes the remediation of stuttering in an adult participant with a long-term history of drug abuse. The unique participant in this case underwent this successful treatment at an urban residential rehabilitation mission where he was living in lieu of incarceration. \n Methods: The therapeutic intervention in this case consisted of two programs. The primary intervention involved the Ryan Fluency Program, Gradual Increase in Length and Complexity of Utterance (GILCU), which is a stepbased program that requires the participant to progress from the production of a single, fluent word to 10 minutes of conversation in the absence of overt disfluencies. Based on the particular needs of this participant, the primary investigator incorporated the use of delayed auditory feedback in an effort to demonstrate to the participant that fluent speech was possible. \n Results: As seen in tables and as discussed in the article, the participant initially produced 16 stuttered words per minute in the Fluency Interview and this number was reduced to .06 stuttered words per minute five months later. Additionally, the participant spoke at an average of 130.0 WS/M, which falls into the average rate based on norms established by Ryan (150.9, with range of 119-182.6). At nine months post-assessment, the participant was demonstrating smooth, forward-flowing, speech, free of overt disfluencies, with appropriate rate. \n Conclusion: This case study adds credence to the growing body of evidence supporting fluency shaping, behaviorally based programs to remediate overt stuttering. Further, this study, which used delayed auditory feedback in conjunction with GILCU, demonstrates the appropriateness of designing therapeutic interventions based on the specific needs of each participant. Finally, this case study validates the in depth knowledge of experienced clinicians as a significant factor in the decision making process for selecting and implementing interventions.","PeriodicalId":231062,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Communication Disorders, Deaf Studies & Hearing Aids","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2375-4427.1000119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This research article describes the remediation of stuttering in an adult participant with a long-term history of drug abuse. The unique participant in this case underwent this successful treatment at an urban residential rehabilitation mission where he was living in lieu of incarceration. Methods: The therapeutic intervention in this case consisted of two programs. The primary intervention involved the Ryan Fluency Program, Gradual Increase in Length and Complexity of Utterance (GILCU), which is a stepbased program that requires the participant to progress from the production of a single, fluent word to 10 minutes of conversation in the absence of overt disfluencies. Based on the particular needs of this participant, the primary investigator incorporated the use of delayed auditory feedback in an effort to demonstrate to the participant that fluent speech was possible. Results: As seen in tables and as discussed in the article, the participant initially produced 16 stuttered words per minute in the Fluency Interview and this number was reduced to .06 stuttered words per minute five months later. Additionally, the participant spoke at an average of 130.0 WS/M, which falls into the average rate based on norms established by Ryan (150.9, with range of 119-182.6). At nine months post-assessment, the participant was demonstrating smooth, forward-flowing, speech, free of overt disfluencies, with appropriate rate. Conclusion: This case study adds credence to the growing body of evidence supporting fluency shaping, behaviorally based programs to remediate overt stuttering. Further, this study, which used delayed auditory feedback in conjunction with GILCU, demonstrates the appropriateness of designing therapeutic interventions based on the specific needs of each participant. Finally, this case study validates the in depth knowledge of experienced clinicians as a significant factor in the decision making process for selecting and implementing interventions.
长期口吃的言语矫正:个案研究
背景:本研究描述了一名长期药物滥用史的成人口吃患者的治疗方法。在这个案例中,这个独特的参与者在一个城市住宅康复任务中接受了这种成功的治疗,他在那里生活,代替监禁。方法:本病例的治疗干预包括两个方案。主要的干预包括Ryan流畅性计划,逐渐增加话语的长度和复杂性(GILCU),这是一个基于步骤的计划,要求参与者在没有明显不流畅的情况下,从产生一个流利的单词到进行10分钟的对话。基于该参与者的特殊需求,主要研究者结合了延迟听觉反馈的使用,以努力向参与者证明流利的语言是可能的。结果:如表中所示和文章中所讨论的,参与者最初在流利性访谈中每分钟产生16个口吃单词,五个月后这个数字减少到每分钟0.06个口吃单词。此外,参与者的平均发言速度为130.0 WS/M,这符合Ryan建立的标准(150.9 WS/M,范围为119-182.6)。在九个月后的评估中,参与者以适当的速度表现出流畅、流畅的语言,没有明显的不流畅。结论:这个案例研究增加了越来越多的证据,支持流畅性塑造,行为为基础的方案,以纠正明显的口吃。此外,本研究将延迟听觉反馈与GILCU结合使用,证明了根据每个参与者的具体需求设计治疗干预措施的适当性。最后,本案例研究验证了经验丰富的临床医生在选择和实施干预措施的决策过程中的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信