Thinking Regionally: How to Improve Service Delivery in Canada's Cities

Zachary Spicer, Adam Found
{"title":"Thinking Regionally: How to Improve Service Delivery in Canada's Cities","authors":"Zachary Spicer, Adam Found","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2855982","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As city-regions across Canada continue to grow, the need for some municipal services, such as mass transit, is shifting from a local to a regional basis. This transformation is giving rise to regional servicing challenges, placing greater pressure on city-regions and their municipalities to provide services across municipal boundaries in a coordinated and streamlined fashion. For instance, cross-boundary commuters in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area face an array of unintegrated local transit systems and fare structures that are apart from the regional transit authority, Metrolinx. While mass transit in the Vancouver metropolitan area has been integrated under the regional transit authority, TransLink, local and provincial officials are looking for ways to improve the governance of TransLink. The antiquated solutions of forced amalgamation and provincial mandates on service sharing have produced few economies of scale and have greatly undermined local autonomy. Provinces need to shift their focus from imposing centralized local government to creating frameworks that promote cooperative and flexible local governance. By working together in such a framework, municipalities can identify and resolve regional servicing challenges effectively, all while keeping amalgamation at bay and their local autonomy intact. City-regions across Canada should be looking to the regional district governance model in British Columbia, where regional districts are “regional coordinators,” rather than “regional authorities” with topdown powers. The distinction matters greatly for regional governance. Along these lines, TransLink in British Columbia and Metrolinx in Ontario should include local policymakers and stakeholders on their boards more than they do today. This would result in transit services being better tailored to the municipalities served and would improve accountability and transparency. The Alberta government has been engaged in a series of changes to the Municipal Government Act, with a particular focus on mandating how municipalities are to work together. Instead of this authoritative approach, which has failed in Ontario, Alberta should create the kind of regional governance framework in which municipalities will want to work and cooperate. Intermunicipal cooperation offers municipalities an effective means to strike an efficient balance between the need to meet regional interests on the one hand and to maintain local autonomy on the other.","PeriodicalId":276490,"journal":{"name":"ERN: U.S. & Canada (Topic)","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: U.S. & Canada (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2855982","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

As city-regions across Canada continue to grow, the need for some municipal services, such as mass transit, is shifting from a local to a regional basis. This transformation is giving rise to regional servicing challenges, placing greater pressure on city-regions and their municipalities to provide services across municipal boundaries in a coordinated and streamlined fashion. For instance, cross-boundary commuters in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area face an array of unintegrated local transit systems and fare structures that are apart from the regional transit authority, Metrolinx. While mass transit in the Vancouver metropolitan area has been integrated under the regional transit authority, TransLink, local and provincial officials are looking for ways to improve the governance of TransLink. The antiquated solutions of forced amalgamation and provincial mandates on service sharing have produced few economies of scale and have greatly undermined local autonomy. Provinces need to shift their focus from imposing centralized local government to creating frameworks that promote cooperative and flexible local governance. By working together in such a framework, municipalities can identify and resolve regional servicing challenges effectively, all while keeping amalgamation at bay and their local autonomy intact. City-regions across Canada should be looking to the regional district governance model in British Columbia, where regional districts are “regional coordinators,” rather than “regional authorities” with topdown powers. The distinction matters greatly for regional governance. Along these lines, TransLink in British Columbia and Metrolinx in Ontario should include local policymakers and stakeholders on their boards more than they do today. This would result in transit services being better tailored to the municipalities served and would improve accountability and transparency. The Alberta government has been engaged in a series of changes to the Municipal Government Act, with a particular focus on mandating how municipalities are to work together. Instead of this authoritative approach, which has failed in Ontario, Alberta should create the kind of regional governance framework in which municipalities will want to work and cooperate. Intermunicipal cooperation offers municipalities an effective means to strike an efficient balance between the need to meet regional interests on the one hand and to maintain local autonomy on the other.
区域思维:如何改善加拿大城市的服务提供
随着加拿大城市地区的持续增长,对一些市政服务的需求,如公共交通,正在从地方转移到区域基础上。这种转变引起了区域服务方面的挑战,给城市区域及其市政当局以协调和精简的方式跨城市边界提供服务带来了更大的压力。例如,大多伦多和汉密尔顿地区的跨境通勤者面临着一系列不整合的当地交通系统和票价结构,这些系统和票价结构与地区交通管理局Metrolinx无关。当温哥华大都市区的公共交通被整合到地区交通管理局TransLink之下时,地方和省级官员正在寻找改善TransLink管理的方法。强制合并和省级强制服务共享的过时解决方案几乎没有产生规模经济效益,而且极大地损害了地方自治。各省需要将重点从强制实行中央集权的地方政府转向建立促进合作和灵活的地方治理的框架。通过在这样的框架内共同努力,市政当局可以有效地识别和解决区域服务挑战,同时保持合并和地方自治完整。加拿大各地的城市地区都应该学习不列颠哥伦比亚省的地区地区治理模式,在那里,地区地区是“地区协调员”,而不是拥有自上而下权力的“地区当局”。这一区别对地区治理至关重要。沿着这条路线,不列颠哥伦比亚省的TransLink和安大略省的Metrolinx应该比现在更多地将当地政策制定者和利益相关者纳入董事会。这将使过境服务更适合所服务的城市,并将改善问责制和透明度。艾伯塔省政府对《市政府法》进行了一系列修改,特别侧重于规定市政当局如何协同工作。这种权威的方法在安大略省已经失败,阿尔伯塔省应该建立一种区域治理框架,让市政当局愿意在其中工作和合作。市间合作为市政当局提供了一种有效的手段,可以在满足区域利益的需要和保持地方自治的需要之间取得有效的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信