Decolonizing e-government benchmarking

Erico Przeybilovicz, M. A. Cunha, Manuella Maia Ribeiro
{"title":"Decolonizing e-government benchmarking","authors":"Erico Przeybilovicz, M. A. Cunha, Manuella Maia Ribeiro","doi":"10.1145/3598469.3598534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Digital government can act as an enabler of sustainability, equity and social inclusion and represents a cross-cutting objective across several SDGs. This paper seeks to further the discussion on e-government benchmarking due to the proliferation of different models and measures. The literature on the subject shows the need to pay continuous and careful attention to how we should understand and study the measurement of e-government development [39]. Mainly because the extensive use of benchmarks by large and important organizations (United Nations, European Union, World Bank, OECD) and international companies have influenced 'what it is important to measure', this ends up steering the government's efforts in a particular direction. At the same time, the models and indicators used to assess e-government need to be sensitive to the regional and local context and the purpose of public administration to provide better services and generate public value. We present the results of research conducted in Brazil to identify the online presence of municipalities and contribute to measuring electronic government's progress at the local level based on the Local Online Service Index methodology. The research's main objectives were to understand Brazilian municipalities' online presence and evaluate their online portals regarding technological resources, content and service provision, and local participation and engagement mechanisms. Based on the experience of applying the LOSI in Brazil, we sought to discuss e-government benchmarking from a decolonization perspective [25], theoretically questioning how it is possible and why it is important to include local perspectives in global benchmarking models.","PeriodicalId":401026,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","volume":"354 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 24th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3598469.3598534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Digital government can act as an enabler of sustainability, equity and social inclusion and represents a cross-cutting objective across several SDGs. This paper seeks to further the discussion on e-government benchmarking due to the proliferation of different models and measures. The literature on the subject shows the need to pay continuous and careful attention to how we should understand and study the measurement of e-government development [39]. Mainly because the extensive use of benchmarks by large and important organizations (United Nations, European Union, World Bank, OECD) and international companies have influenced 'what it is important to measure', this ends up steering the government's efforts in a particular direction. At the same time, the models and indicators used to assess e-government need to be sensitive to the regional and local context and the purpose of public administration to provide better services and generate public value. We present the results of research conducted in Brazil to identify the online presence of municipalities and contribute to measuring electronic government's progress at the local level based on the Local Online Service Index methodology. The research's main objectives were to understand Brazilian municipalities' online presence and evaluate their online portals regarding technological resources, content and service provision, and local participation and engagement mechanisms. Based on the experience of applying the LOSI in Brazil, we sought to discuss e-government benchmarking from a decolonization perspective [25], theoretically questioning how it is possible and why it is important to include local perspectives in global benchmarking models.
非殖民化电子政府基准
数字政府可以作为可持续性、公平和社会包容的推动者,代表了几个可持续发展目标的跨领域目标。由于电子政务标杆管理的模式和措施层出不穷,本文试图进一步探讨电子政务标杆管理。关于这一主题的文献表明,我们应该如何理解和研究电子政务发展的测量,需要持续而仔细的关注[39]。主要是因为大型重要组织(联合国、欧盟、世界银行、经合组织)和国际公司广泛使用基准,影响了“衡量什么是重要的”,这最终导致政府的努力朝着特定的方向发展。同时,用于评估电子政务的模型和指标需要对区域和地方背景以及公共行政的目的敏感,以提供更好的服务并产生公共价值。我们提出了在巴西进行的研究结果,以确定市政当局的在线存在,并根据本地在线服务指数方法,为衡量电子政务在地方一级的进展做出贡献。该研究的主要目的是了解巴西各城市的在线情况,并评估其在线门户网站的技术资源、内容和服务提供以及当地参与和参与机制。基于在巴西应用LOSI的经验,我们试图从非殖民化的角度讨论电子政务基准[25],从理论上质疑它是如何可能的,以及为什么在全球基准模型中纳入当地视角是重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信