Unipolar ve Bipolar Depresif Bozuklukta Bazı Hematolojik Parametrelerin

Okan İmre
{"title":"Unipolar ve Bipolar Depresif Bozuklukta Bazı Hematolojik Parametrelerin","authors":"Okan İmre","doi":"10.35440/hutfd.1321421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, which are the most severe types of mood disorders, are among the diseases that cause the most disability worldwide. One of the biggest challenges in providing early and effective treatment in mood disorders is the inability to make an early differential diagnosis between UD and BD. Many studies have suggested that neuroinflammation may play a role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are relatively cheap hematological parameters recommended to measure the level of inflammation. This study aimed to examine the potential role of inflammatory processes in the pathogenesis of unipolar depression(UD) and bipolar depression(BD) by analyzing various hematologic markers, including NLR, PLR, and MLR\nMaterials and Methods: The patient group comprised 54 individuals(UD: 31, BD: 23), while the healthy control(HC) group comprised 40 individuals. The study compared the values of hematologic markers between the groups.\nResults:The study found significant differences only in the levels of NLR among the analyzed hematologic markers(p=0.004). When the UD and BD groups were compared with HC separately, NLR was significantly higher in both the UD and BD groups compared to the HC group(p=0.002, p=0.015). When UD and BD were compared with each other, there was no significant difference in terms of NLR(P=0,416).\nConclusions: In our study, although there was no significant difference between BD and UD in terms of NLR, PLR and MLR, the higher NLR in both patient groups compared to HC suggests the presence of inflammation in both BD and UD patients. More evidence is needed to evaluate it as a disease-specific marker.","PeriodicalId":117847,"journal":{"name":"Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35440/hutfd.1321421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder, which are the most severe types of mood disorders, are among the diseases that cause the most disability worldwide. One of the biggest challenges in providing early and effective treatment in mood disorders is the inability to make an early differential diagnosis between UD and BD. Many studies have suggested that neuroinflammation may play a role in the pathophysiology of mood disorders. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet/lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and monocyte/lymphocyte ratio (MLR) are relatively cheap hematological parameters recommended to measure the level of inflammation. This study aimed to examine the potential role of inflammatory processes in the pathogenesis of unipolar depression(UD) and bipolar depression(BD) by analyzing various hematologic markers, including NLR, PLR, and MLR Materials and Methods: The patient group comprised 54 individuals(UD: 31, BD: 23), while the healthy control(HC) group comprised 40 individuals. The study compared the values of hematologic markers between the groups. Results:The study found significant differences only in the levels of NLR among the analyzed hematologic markers(p=0.004). When the UD and BD groups were compared with HC separately, NLR was significantly higher in both the UD and BD groups compared to the HC group(p=0.002, p=0.015). When UD and BD were compared with each other, there was no significant difference in terms of NLR(P=0,416). Conclusions: In our study, although there was no significant difference between BD and UD in terms of NLR, PLR and MLR, the higher NLR in both patient groups compared to HC suggests the presence of inflammation in both BD and UD patients. More evidence is needed to evaluate it as a disease-specific marker.
背景:重度抑郁症和双相情感障碍是最严重的情绪障碍类型,是全世界导致残疾最多的疾病之一。提供早期有效治疗情绪障碍的最大挑战之一是无法对UD和BD进行早期鉴别诊断。许多研究表明,神经炎症可能在情绪障碍的病理生理中起作用。中性粒细胞/淋巴细胞比率(NLR)、血小板/淋巴细胞比率(PLR)和单核细胞/淋巴细胞比率(MLR)是相对便宜的血液学参数,被推荐用于测量炎症水平。本研究旨在通过分析各种血液学指标,包括NLR、PLR和mlr,探讨炎症过程在单极抑郁症(UD)和双相抑郁症(BD)发病机制中的潜在作用。材料和方法:患者组54人(UD: 31, BD: 23),健康对照组40人。比较两组患者血液学指标的变化。结果:研究发现仅NLR水平在分析的血液学指标之间存在显著差异(p=0.004)。当UD组和BD组分别与HC组比较时,UD组和BD组NLR均显著高于HC组(p=0.002, p=0.015)。当UD和BD相互比较时,NLR差异无统计学意义(P=0,416)。结论:在我们的研究中,尽管BD和UD在NLR、PLR和MLR方面没有显著差异,但两组患者的NLR均高于HC,表明BD和UD患者均存在炎症。需要更多的证据来评估它作为一种疾病特异性标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信