The SFRY experience in combating the Variola vera epidemic in 1972: The significance of historical heritage for ex-Yugoslav republics in the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic

Milica Ristić
{"title":"The SFRY experience in combating the Variola vera epidemic in 1972: The significance of historical heritage for ex-Yugoslav republics in the circumstances of the COVID-19 pandemic","authors":"Milica Ristić","doi":"10.5937/zrpfn1-40407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The outbreak of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic in early 2020 reminded many people in the Balkans of the somewhat forgotten case of Variola vera (small pox) epidemic in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) in 1972. The example of the former Yugoslav state, which managed to conduct fast and effective vaccination of about 18 million citizens and declare the end to the epidemic within two months, has been increasingly emphasized in public. By contrast, the ex-Yugoslav republics have been fighting the (COVID-19 pandemic for the past two years, unsuccessfully for the most part. In this context, the experience of the former SFRY could be valuable and instructive for the successor states in the fight against the current pandemic. In this paper, the author attempts to provide an insight into the regulations that were in force in the SFRY before, during and after the outbreak of the Variola Vera epidemic, both at the federal level and in individual republics. Taking into consideration the historical and political circumstances and the development of new technologies from 1972 to the present time, the author aims to address the following question: is the legal framework of a state the decisive factor in combating serious infectious diseases, or may the non-legal factors prevail over legal regulation and dictate the direction of the epidemic?","PeriodicalId":192224,"journal":{"name":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta Nis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5937/zrpfn1-40407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The outbreak of the COVID-19 (Coronavirus) pandemic in early 2020 reminded many people in the Balkans of the somewhat forgotten case of Variola vera (small pox) epidemic in the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (SFRY) in 1972. The example of the former Yugoslav state, which managed to conduct fast and effective vaccination of about 18 million citizens and declare the end to the epidemic within two months, has been increasingly emphasized in public. By contrast, the ex-Yugoslav republics have been fighting the (COVID-19 pandemic for the past two years, unsuccessfully for the most part. In this context, the experience of the former SFRY could be valuable and instructive for the successor states in the fight against the current pandemic. In this paper, the author attempts to provide an insight into the regulations that were in force in the SFRY before, during and after the outbreak of the Variola Vera epidemic, both at the federal level and in individual republics. Taking into consideration the historical and political circumstances and the development of new technologies from 1972 to the present time, the author aims to address the following question: is the legal framework of a state the decisive factor in combating serious infectious diseases, or may the non-legal factors prevail over legal regulation and dictate the direction of the epidemic?
南斯拉夫联邦共和国1972年抗击天花疫情的经验:在2019冠状病毒病大流行的情况下,历史遗产对前南斯拉夫共和国的意义
2020年初爆发的COVID-19(冠状病毒)大流行让巴尔干半岛的许多人想起了1972年在前南斯拉夫社会主义联邦共和国(SFRY)发生的小天花疫情。前南斯拉夫国家成功地对大约1 800万公民进行了快速和有效的疫苗接种,并在两个月内宣布该流行病结束,这一例子在公开场合得到越来越多的强调。相比之下,前南斯拉夫各共和国在过去两年中一直在与COVID-19大流行作斗争,但大部分都没有成功。在这方面,前南斯拉夫联邦共和国的经验对继承国抗击当前流行病的斗争具有宝贵和指导意义。在本文中,提交人试图深入了解在天花疫情爆发之前、期间和之后,在联邦一级和在个别共和国一级在南斯拉夫联邦共和国实施的条例。考虑到1972年至今的历史和政治环境以及新技术的发展,提交人的目的是解决以下问题:一个国家的法律框架是与严重传染病作斗争的决定性因素,还是非法律因素凌驾于法律规定之上并决定流行病的方向?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信