Towards a global Technology Assessment – Implications, challenges and limits

J. Hahn
{"title":"Towards a global Technology Assessment – Implications, challenges and limits","authors":"J. Hahn","doi":"10.5771/9783748907275-175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across different countries we find science and technology (S&T) strategies integrally linked to societal well-being and progress in diverse ways. This shows in S&T priority and agenda settings of national governments, which often link advancements in S&T to social needs and expectations of citizens. Understanding these connections between priorities and societal needs and how they are situated in a global context is in turn highly relevant in order to better align these societal needs and expectations, S&T developments and policy measures towards addressing (global) challenges. An array of terms make this connection, ranging from Responsible Research and Innovation (von Schomberg 2013), often referred to in the European context, to aspects of accessibility and equity, as used in the Indian setting (Chaturvedi et al. 2015), or Sustainable Development and its goals as suggested on an international scale on the level of the United Nations75. Technological developments such as digitalization have wide implications for many areas of society and people’s lives across different countries. Expectations regarding changing working conditions or how and which data is collected should be taken into account when shaping and framing the advancement of digital technologies. This in turn requires assessment as well as their contextualization. As technologies become increasingly global in scope and effect and globalization tendencies are supported and determined by S&T developments, ways of shaping these according to specific national and cultural contexts should be explored. At the same time, the simultaneity of these developments calls for wider strategies with explicitly global perspectives in order to better grasp and ideally shape these worldwide tendencies. The following text aims to discuss the role Technology Assessment (TA), as a fairly established Western approach, can play regarding the issues raised above. The assumption is that TA, if widened beyond its previously mainly national focus, can be a useful approach to take on assessments on a global 1","PeriodicalId":141375,"journal":{"name":"Die neutrale Normativität der Technikfolgenabschätzung","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Die neutrale Normativität der Technikfolgenabschätzung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/9783748907275-175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Across different countries we find science and technology (S&T) strategies integrally linked to societal well-being and progress in diverse ways. This shows in S&T priority and agenda settings of national governments, which often link advancements in S&T to social needs and expectations of citizens. Understanding these connections between priorities and societal needs and how they are situated in a global context is in turn highly relevant in order to better align these societal needs and expectations, S&T developments and policy measures towards addressing (global) challenges. An array of terms make this connection, ranging from Responsible Research and Innovation (von Schomberg 2013), often referred to in the European context, to aspects of accessibility and equity, as used in the Indian setting (Chaturvedi et al. 2015), or Sustainable Development and its goals as suggested on an international scale on the level of the United Nations75. Technological developments such as digitalization have wide implications for many areas of society and people’s lives across different countries. Expectations regarding changing working conditions or how and which data is collected should be taken into account when shaping and framing the advancement of digital technologies. This in turn requires assessment as well as their contextualization. As technologies become increasingly global in scope and effect and globalization tendencies are supported and determined by S&T developments, ways of shaping these according to specific national and cultural contexts should be explored. At the same time, the simultaneity of these developments calls for wider strategies with explicitly global perspectives in order to better grasp and ideally shape these worldwide tendencies. The following text aims to discuss the role Technology Assessment (TA), as a fairly established Western approach, can play regarding the issues raised above. The assumption is that TA, if widened beyond its previously mainly national focus, can be a useful approach to take on assessments on a global 1
迈向全球技术评估-影响、挑战和限制
在不同的国家,我们发现科学技术战略以不同的方式与社会福祉和进步紧密相连。这表现在国家政府的科技优先级和议程设置上,它们经常将科技进步与公民的社会需求和期望联系起来。理解这些优先事项和社会需求之间的联系,以及它们在全球背景下的定位,对于更好地协调这些社会需求和期望、科技发展和应对(全球)挑战的政策措施具有高度相关性。一系列术语建立了这种联系,从欧洲背景下经常提到的负责任的研究和创新(von Schomberg 2013),到印度背景下使用的可及性和公平性(Chaturvedi et al. 2015),或联合国层面的国际范围内建议的可持续发展及其目标75。数字化等技术发展对不同国家的社会和人民生活的许多领域产生了广泛的影响。在塑造和构建数字技术的进步时,应考虑到对不断变化的工作条件或如何收集数据以及收集哪些数据的期望。这反过来又需要评估,以及他们的背景。随着技术在范围和影响上日益全球化,全球化趋势受到科技发展的支持和决定,应该探索根据具体国家和文化背景塑造这些技术的方法。与此同时,这些发展的同时性要求更广泛的战略具有明确的全球观点,以便更好地掌握和理想地塑造这些世界趋势。下面的文章旨在讨论技术评估(TA)作为一种相当成熟的西方方法,在上述问题上可以发挥的作用。假设是,如果将评估范围扩大到以前主要以国家为重点之外,就可以成为对全球1进行评估的有用方法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信