Development of Green Building Materials’ Evaluation Criteria to Achieve Optimum Building Facade Energy Performance

Marwa M. Gomaa Mayhoub, Mona G. Ibrahim, Zeyad M. Tarek El Sayad, Ahmed Abdel Monteleb M. Ali
{"title":"Development of Green Building Materials’ Evaluation Criteria to Achieve Optimum Building Facade Energy Performance","authors":"Marwa M. Gomaa Mayhoub, Mona G. Ibrahim, Zeyad M. Tarek El Sayad, Ahmed Abdel Monteleb M. Ali","doi":"10.1109/icseea47812.2019.8938620","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Since buildings and their construction materials exploit natural resources as well as the effect on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, evaluating building materials is needed to have more sustainable buildings. This study proposes a methodology to define the proper selection of green building materials that can be used for building façades; whilst taking its thermal performance and energy efficiency into account. Additionally, the study compared the energy consumption for six conventional materials for two types of buildings (Educational, Residential) in four climate zones using a simulation program (DesignBuilder). It included also the embodied carbon and equivalent CO2 for different types of used external façades materials. The evaluation and results is an important step to identify the suitable material that could be replaced with green material and determine how it performs in terms of simulation results and matching with the proposed criteria. The results show enhancement of thermal comfort when replacing a conventional material Brickwork with an environmentally friendly one (Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Block). Moreover, it has a positive impact regarding sub-criteria (from the proposed framework). However, the proposed green material couldn’t achieve the expected performance regarding energy performance (as it achieved a minor enhancement from 3245.07 to 3239.1 KWh, U-value for both materials is close) or embodied energy (as the increase of kgCO2 from 758 to 1649.3 due to cement which is one of its ingredients).","PeriodicalId":232017,"journal":{"name":"2019 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA)","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/icseea47812.2019.8938620","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Since buildings and their construction materials exploit natural resources as well as the effect on energy consumption and carbon dioxide emissions, evaluating building materials is needed to have more sustainable buildings. This study proposes a methodology to define the proper selection of green building materials that can be used for building façades; whilst taking its thermal performance and energy efficiency into account. Additionally, the study compared the energy consumption for six conventional materials for two types of buildings (Educational, Residential) in four climate zones using a simulation program (DesignBuilder). It included also the embodied carbon and equivalent CO2 for different types of used external façades materials. The evaluation and results is an important step to identify the suitable material that could be replaced with green material and determine how it performs in terms of simulation results and matching with the proposed criteria. The results show enhancement of thermal comfort when replacing a conventional material Brickwork with an environmentally friendly one (Autoclaved Aerated Concrete Block). Moreover, it has a positive impact regarding sub-criteria (from the proposed framework). However, the proposed green material couldn’t achieve the expected performance regarding energy performance (as it achieved a minor enhancement from 3245.07 to 3239.1 KWh, U-value for both materials is close) or embodied energy (as the increase of kgCO2 from 758 to 1649.3 due to cement which is one of its ingredients).
绿色建筑材料评价标准的制定以达到最佳建筑立面能源性能
由于建筑物及其建筑材料利用自然资源以及对能源消耗和二氧化碳排放的影响,因此需要对建筑材料进行评估,以获得更可持续的建筑。本研究提出了一种方法来定义可用于建筑立面的绿色建筑材料的适当选择;同时考虑其热性能和能源效率。此外,该研究使用模拟程序(DesignBuilder)比较了四种气候区两种类型建筑(教育建筑和住宅建筑)的六种传统材料的能耗。它还包括不同类型使用的外部环境材料的隐含碳和当量二氧化碳。评估和结果是确定可以用绿色材料替代的合适材料,并确定其在模拟结果和与拟议标准匹配方面的表现的重要步骤。结果表明,当用环保材料(蒸压加气混凝土砌块)取代传统材料砌块时,热舒适性得到增强。此外,它对子标准(来自提议的框架)有积极的影响。然而,所提出的绿色材料在能源性能(从3245.07到3239.1千瓦时略有提高,两种材料的u值接近)或隐含能量(由于水泥是其成分之一,因此kgCO2从758增加到1649.3)方面未能达到预期的性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信