Economic resilience to shocks: The role of structural policies

R. Duval, L. Vogel
{"title":"Economic resilience to shocks: The role of structural policies","authors":"R. Duval, L. Vogel","doi":"10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2008-ART6-EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cyclical fluctuations in economic activity have moderated over time but the extent and dynamics of volatility remain different across OECD countries. A reason behind this heterogeneity is that countries exhibit different degrees of resilience in the face of common shocks. This paper traces divergences in resilience back to different policy settings and institutions in labour, product and financial markets. Using pooled regression analysis across 20 OECD countries over the period 1982-2003, the paper identifies the impact of policy settings on two dimensions of resilience: the impact effect of a shock and its subsequent persistence. Policies and institutions associated with rigidities in labour and product markets are found to dampen the initial impact of shocks but to make their effects more persistent, while policies allowing for deep mortgage markets lower persistence and thereby improve resilience. Combining these two dimensions of resilience, the paper then uses the estimated equations to derive indicators of resilience for the OECD countries concerned, based on their current or recent policy settings. Three groups of countries emerge. In English-speaking countries, simulations suggest shocks have a significant initial effect on activity but this impact then dies out relatively quickly. By contrast, in many continental European countries the initial impact of shocks is cushioned but their effect linger for longer, with the cumulated output loss tending to be larger than in English-speaking countries. Finally a few, mostly small, European countries combine cushioning of the initial shock with a fairly quick return to baseline.","PeriodicalId":416490,"journal":{"name":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"58","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oecd Journal: Economic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1787/ECO_STUDIES-V2008-ART6-EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 58

Abstract

Cyclical fluctuations in economic activity have moderated over time but the extent and dynamics of volatility remain different across OECD countries. A reason behind this heterogeneity is that countries exhibit different degrees of resilience in the face of common shocks. This paper traces divergences in resilience back to different policy settings and institutions in labour, product and financial markets. Using pooled regression analysis across 20 OECD countries over the period 1982-2003, the paper identifies the impact of policy settings on two dimensions of resilience: the impact effect of a shock and its subsequent persistence. Policies and institutions associated with rigidities in labour and product markets are found to dampen the initial impact of shocks but to make their effects more persistent, while policies allowing for deep mortgage markets lower persistence and thereby improve resilience. Combining these two dimensions of resilience, the paper then uses the estimated equations to derive indicators of resilience for the OECD countries concerned, based on their current or recent policy settings. Three groups of countries emerge. In English-speaking countries, simulations suggest shocks have a significant initial effect on activity but this impact then dies out relatively quickly. By contrast, in many continental European countries the initial impact of shocks is cushioned but their effect linger for longer, with the cumulated output loss tending to be larger than in English-speaking countries. Finally a few, mostly small, European countries combine cushioning of the initial shock with a fairly quick return to baseline.
经济抗冲击能力:结构性政策的作用
随着时间的推移,经济活动的周期性波动有所缓和,但经合组织国家之间波动的程度和力度仍然不同。这种异质性背后的一个原因是,面对共同的冲击,各国表现出不同程度的抵御能力。本文将韧性的差异追溯到劳动力、产品和金融市场的不同政策设置和制度。利用1982-2003年期间20个经合组织国家的汇总回归分析,本文确定了政策设置对弹性的两个维度的影响:冲击的影响效应及其随后的持续性。研究发现,与劳动力和产品市场刚性相关的政策和制度会抑制冲击的初始影响,但会使其影响更加持久,而允许深度抵押贷款市场的政策会降低持久性,从而提高弹性。结合弹性的这两个维度,本文然后使用估计的方程,根据有关经合组织国家当前或最近的政策设置,得出其弹性指标。出现了三组国家。模拟表明,在英语国家,冲击对经济活动有显著的初始影响,但这种影响随后相对较快地消失。相比之下,在许多欧洲大陆国家,冲击的最初影响得到缓冲,但其影响持续的时间更长,累积的产出损失往往比英语国家更大。最后,一些欧洲国家(大多是小国)将缓冲最初的冲击与相当快地恢复到基准水平结合起来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信