Language Ideology and Public Discourse

Tommaso M. Milani
{"title":"Language Ideology and Public Discourse","authors":"Tommaso M. Milani","doi":"10.1002/9781405198431.WBEAL0623.PUB2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the past two decades, the notion of language ideology has gained considerable momentum in different strands of scholarship that aim to unpack how language works in society. Language ideology has its roots in North American linguistic anthropology as a concept within which to explore the “mediating links between social forms and forms of talk” (Woolard, 1998, p. 3). Whilst it is axiomatic for linguists that “all languages are equal” in terms of their meaning-making potential and their worth as objects of academic inquiry, a cursory glance at any sociolinguistic environment in the “real world” will reveal a different scenario—one in which linguistic phenomena are unequally ranked according to different meanings and values, so that, say, “language” X is believed to be lexically richer, more logical or beautiful, and thus better suited for wider communication within a polity than “dialect” Y. It is precisely the belief systems underlying such social processes of naming, signifying, and valorizing linguistic practices that the notion of language ideology aims to capture. This entry will begin by clarifying the notion of language ideology, followed by a reflection over the notions of public versus private in relation to language ideology. The entry will conclude with some current developments and directions in language ideology research. \n \n \nKeywords: \n \ndiscourse analysis; \nlinguistic anthropology; \nsociolinguistics; \nideology; \nsociocultural language studies","PeriodicalId":298589,"journal":{"name":"The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.WBEAL0623.PUB2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Over the past two decades, the notion of language ideology has gained considerable momentum in different strands of scholarship that aim to unpack how language works in society. Language ideology has its roots in North American linguistic anthropology as a concept within which to explore the “mediating links between social forms and forms of talk” (Woolard, 1998, p. 3). Whilst it is axiomatic for linguists that “all languages are equal” in terms of their meaning-making potential and their worth as objects of academic inquiry, a cursory glance at any sociolinguistic environment in the “real world” will reveal a different scenario—one in which linguistic phenomena are unequally ranked according to different meanings and values, so that, say, “language” X is believed to be lexically richer, more logical or beautiful, and thus better suited for wider communication within a polity than “dialect” Y. It is precisely the belief systems underlying such social processes of naming, signifying, and valorizing linguistic practices that the notion of language ideology aims to capture. This entry will begin by clarifying the notion of language ideology, followed by a reflection over the notions of public versus private in relation to language ideology. The entry will conclude with some current developments and directions in language ideology research. Keywords: discourse analysis; linguistic anthropology; sociolinguistics; ideology; sociocultural language studies
语言意识形态与公共话语
在过去的二十年里,语言意识形态的概念在旨在揭示语言在社会中如何运作的不同学术领域中获得了相当大的发展势头。语言意识形态起源于北美语言人类学,作为一个探索“社会形式和谈话形式之间的中介联系”的概念(伍拉德,1998年,第3页)。虽然对于语言学家来说,“所有语言都是平等的”,就其意义创造潜力和作为学术研究对象的价值而言,这是不言自明的,粗略地看一下“现实世界”中的任何社会语言学环境,就会发现一个不同的场景——在这个场景中,语言现象根据不同的意义和价值被不平等地排序,因此,比如说,“语言”X被认为词汇更丰富、更有逻辑性或更漂亮,因此比“方言”y更适合于在一个政体内进行更广泛的交流。语言意识形态的概念旨在捕捉语言实践的价值。本条目将首先澄清语言意识形态的概念,然后反思与语言意识形态相关的公共与私人概念。文章最后将介绍当前语言意识形态研究的一些发展和方向。关键词:语篇分析;语言人类学;社会语言学;意识形态;社会文化语言研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信