Safe simplifying transformations for security protocols or not just the Needham Schroeder pubic key protocol

M. Hui, G. Lowe
{"title":"Safe simplifying transformations for security protocols or not just the Needham Schroeder pubic key protocol","authors":"M. Hui, G. Lowe","doi":"10.1109/CSFW.1999.779760","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent techniques for analyzing security protocols have tended to concentrate upon the small protocols that are typically found in the academic literature. However there is a huge gulf between these and most large commercial protocols: the latter typically have many more fields, and much higher levels of nested encryption. As a result, existing techniques are difficult to apply directly to these large protocols. In this paper we develop the notion of safe simplifying transformations: transformations that have the property of preserving insecurities; the effect of such transformations is that if we can verify the transformed protocol, then we will have verified the original protocol. We identify a number of such safe simplifying transformations, and use them in the analysis of a commercial protocol.","PeriodicalId":374159,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Computer Security Foundations Workshop","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSFW.1999.779760","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Recent techniques for analyzing security protocols have tended to concentrate upon the small protocols that are typically found in the academic literature. However there is a huge gulf between these and most large commercial protocols: the latter typically have many more fields, and much higher levels of nested encryption. As a result, existing techniques are difficult to apply directly to these large protocols. In this paper we develop the notion of safe simplifying transformations: transformations that have the property of preserving insecurities; the effect of such transformations is that if we can verify the transformed protocol, then we will have verified the original protocol. We identify a number of such safe simplifying transformations, and use them in the analysis of a commercial protocol.
安全简化安全协议的转换,或者不仅仅是Needham Schroeder公钥协议
最近分析安全协议的技术倾向于集中在学术文献中常见的小协议上。然而,这些协议与大多数大型商业协议之间存在巨大差距:后者通常具有更多字段,以及更高级别的嵌套加密。因此,现有技术很难直接应用于这些大型协议。在本文中,我们提出了安全简化变换的概念:具有保持不安全性质的变换;这种转换的效果是,如果我们能够验证转换后的协议,那么我们就已经验证了原始协议。我们确定了许多这样的安全简化转换,并在商业协议的分析中使用它们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信