RESTOTATIVE JUSTICE POLICY OF CLASS I DRUG CONVICTS OF MARIJUANA IN DEALING WITH OVER-CAPACITY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA

Alfredo Risano, A. Ningtias
{"title":"RESTOTATIVE JUSTICE POLICY OF CLASS I DRUG CONVICTS OF MARIJUANA IN DEALING WITH OVER-CAPACITY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS IN INDONESIA","authors":"Alfredo Risano, A. Ningtias","doi":"10.30736/ji.v9i2.142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTLaw Number 35 of 2009 based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, was implemented based on justice, protection, humanity, order, protection and security. Often the authority to try becomes a dilemma for judges when there is a conflict between certainty and a sense of community justice. So it is predictable that the high number of narcotics users greatly affects the number of prisoners/inmates of narcotics abuse cases who enter prisons/detention centers, even though the best place they need is a rehabilitation center. The government, law enforcement officers and the media always provide information about marijuana abuse, if there is abuse the public should also be given information about the 'justification' of marijuana. Here, political will is needed from the government to review policies and provide objective facts about the benefits and dangers of cannabis plants, because politically this can reduce public trust in the government. Based on the facts and explanations of the above, the researchers are interested in conducting legal research on \"Restorative Justice for convicts of narcotics users Golonga1 marijuana\" ","PeriodicalId":352951,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Independent","volume":"187 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Independent","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v9i2.142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTLaw Number 35 of 2009 based on Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, was implemented based on justice, protection, humanity, order, protection and security. Often the authority to try becomes a dilemma for judges when there is a conflict between certainty and a sense of community justice. So it is predictable that the high number of narcotics users greatly affects the number of prisoners/inmates of narcotics abuse cases who enter prisons/detention centers, even though the best place they need is a rehabilitation center. The government, law enforcement officers and the media always provide information about marijuana abuse, if there is abuse the public should also be given information about the 'justification' of marijuana. Here, political will is needed from the government to review policies and provide objective facts about the benefits and dangers of cannabis plants, because politically this can reduce public trust in the government. Based on the facts and explanations of the above, the researchers are interested in conducting legal research on "Restorative Justice for convicts of narcotics users Golonga1 marijuana" 
印度尼西亚一级大麻毒品罪犯在处理收容能力过剩的惩教机构中的恢复司法政策
摘要2009年第35号法律以潘卡西拉(Pancasila)和1945年印度尼西亚共和国宪法为基础,以正义、保护、人道、秩序、保护和安全为基础实施。当确定性和社区正义感之间存在冲突时,审判的权力往往成为法官的两难境地。因此,可以预见的是,大量的毒品使用者极大地影响了进入监狱/拘留中心的毒品滥用案件的囚犯/囚犯的数量,即使他们最需要的地方是康复中心。政府、执法人员和媒体总是提供有关大麻滥用的信息,如果存在滥用,公众也应该获得有关大麻“正当理由”的信息。在这里,政府需要政治意愿来审查政策,并提供关于大麻植物的好处和危险的客观事实,因为从政治上讲,这可能会降低公众对政府的信任。基于上述事实和解释,研究人员有兴趣对“戈龙甲大麻吸毒者的恢复性司法”进行法律研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信