Participation in the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Across Job Titles

Samantha M. Doonan, Julie K. Johnson
{"title":"Participation in the Massachusetts Adult-Use Cannabis Industry by Race/Ethnicity and Gender Across Job Titles","authors":"Samantha M. Doonan, Julie K. Johnson","doi":"10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"States across the U.S. are increasingly legalizing cannabis for recreational purposes (“adult-use”) through licensure of privately-run cannabis establishments. Legalization efforts have partially emerged in response to unequal prohibition enforcement which disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. However, the extent to which people from communities most affected by prohibition are included in the legal industry is unknown. This study is a preliminary analysis of participation by race/ethnicity and gender across job titles in the Massachusetts adult-use cannabis industry from its inception through April 2020 (18-month time span). Data were extracted from cannabis establishments (i.e., licensed adult-use cannabis businesses that collectively form the cannabis industry in Massachusetts). Agent registration forms are required for board members, directors, executives, managers, employees, and volunteers across all license types (e.g. retail, cultivation, product manufacturing). As of April 2020, there were 4,907 unique agents (volunteers excluded) across 205 cannabis establishment licenses. Among agents, 77% were White, 9% were Hispanic/Latino, and 6% were Black/African American, <3% identified other racial and ethnic groups, and data were missing for approximately 6% of the sample (exceeds 100%, as persons can be included in more than one race/ethnicity). Excluding agents with missing race/ethnicity or gender (n=347) and grouping persons at two-levels: (1) white or not-white identifying, and (2) male or female, we found 53% of agents were white and male, 29% were white and female, 12% were an ethnicity and/or race(s) that did not include white (“non-white”) and male, and 5% were non-white and female. Approximately 8% of agents held senior-level positions (i.e., board members, directors, executives) versus less senior positions (i.e., employees, managers). However, white males held 72% of senior positions, white females held 17%, non-white males held 9%, and non-white females held 1%. This study is subject to limitations, including that persons who identified as white and another race(s) (n=103) are included in white-identifying categories; future work will address this limitation. Further, all data is typically reported by supervisors rather than self-reported, therefore race/ethnicity and gender are subject to misidentification. Nonetheless, findings suggest that at approximately one and a half years after retail stores opened, participation in the Massachusetts adult-use cannabis industry skews white and male, and this trend is pronounced in senior-level positions.","PeriodicalId":383892,"journal":{"name":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abstracts from the 2020 Virtual Scientific Meeting of the Research Society on Marijuana July 24th, 2020","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26828/cannabis.2021.01.000.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

States across the U.S. are increasingly legalizing cannabis for recreational purposes (“adult-use”) through licensure of privately-run cannabis establishments. Legalization efforts have partially emerged in response to unequal prohibition enforcement which disproportionately affects Black and Hispanic/Latino communities. However, the extent to which people from communities most affected by prohibition are included in the legal industry is unknown. This study is a preliminary analysis of participation by race/ethnicity and gender across job titles in the Massachusetts adult-use cannabis industry from its inception through April 2020 (18-month time span). Data were extracted from cannabis establishments (i.e., licensed adult-use cannabis businesses that collectively form the cannabis industry in Massachusetts). Agent registration forms are required for board members, directors, executives, managers, employees, and volunteers across all license types (e.g. retail, cultivation, product manufacturing). As of April 2020, there were 4,907 unique agents (volunteers excluded) across 205 cannabis establishment licenses. Among agents, 77% were White, 9% were Hispanic/Latino, and 6% were Black/African American, <3% identified other racial and ethnic groups, and data were missing for approximately 6% of the sample (exceeds 100%, as persons can be included in more than one race/ethnicity). Excluding agents with missing race/ethnicity or gender (n=347) and grouping persons at two-levels: (1) white or not-white identifying, and (2) male or female, we found 53% of agents were white and male, 29% were white and female, 12% were an ethnicity and/or race(s) that did not include white (“non-white”) and male, and 5% were non-white and female. Approximately 8% of agents held senior-level positions (i.e., board members, directors, executives) versus less senior positions (i.e., employees, managers). However, white males held 72% of senior positions, white females held 17%, non-white males held 9%, and non-white females held 1%. This study is subject to limitations, including that persons who identified as white and another race(s) (n=103) are included in white-identifying categories; future work will address this limitation. Further, all data is typically reported by supervisors rather than self-reported, therefore race/ethnicity and gender are subject to misidentification. Nonetheless, findings suggest that at approximately one and a half years after retail stores opened, participation in the Massachusetts adult-use cannabis industry skews white and male, and this trend is pronounced in senior-level positions.
按种族/民族和性别划分的马萨诸塞州成人使用大麻产业的参与情况
美国各州通过向私人经营的大麻场所发放许可证,越来越多地将娱乐用途的大麻(“成人使用”)合法化。禁毒执法不平等对黑人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔社区的影响不成比例,因此出现了部分禁毒努力。然而,受禁令影响最严重的社区的人在多大程度上被纳入法律行业尚不清楚。这项研究是对马萨诸塞州成人用大麻产业从成立到2020年4月(18个月的时间跨度)中种族/民族和性别在不同职位上的参与情况的初步分析。数据提取自大麻场所(即在马萨诸塞州共同构成大麻产业的有执照的成人使用大麻企业)。所有许可证类型(如零售、种植、产品制造)的董事会成员、董事、执行人员、经理、员工和志愿者都需要代理登记表。截至2020年4月,在205个大麻经营许可证中,有4907个独特的代理商(不包括志愿者)。在代理人中,77%为白人,9%为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,6%为黑人/非裔美国人,<3%为其他种族和族裔群体,约6%的样本数据缺失(超过100%,因为人们可以被纳入多个种族/族裔)。排除缺少种族/民族或性别的代理人(n=347),并将人员分为两个层次:(1)白人或非白人识别,(2)男性或女性,我们发现53%的代理人为白人和男性,29%为白人和女性,12%为不包括白人(“非白人”)和男性的种族和/或种族,5%为非白人和女性。大约8%的代理人担任高级职位(即董事会成员、董事、行政人员),而不是高级职位(即雇员、经理)。然而,白人男性占高级职位的72%,白人女性占17%,非白人男性占9%,非白人女性占1%。这项研究存在局限性,包括将被认定为白人和其他种族的人(n=103)纳入白人认定类别;未来的工作将解决这一限制。此外,所有数据通常由主管报告,而不是自我报告,因此种族/民族和性别容易被错误识别。尽管如此,研究结果表明,在零售商店开业大约一年半后,马萨诸塞州成人大麻产业的参与者向白人和男性倾斜,这种趋势在高级职位上很明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信