Adding Osteopathic Intervention to Albuterol Nebulization in Ambulatory Asthma Exacerbations

M. Lee-Wong, M. Karagic, S. Gomez, Anwar C Wilson, D. Resnick
{"title":"Adding Osteopathic Intervention to Albuterol Nebulization in Ambulatory Asthma Exacerbations","authors":"M. Lee-Wong, M. Karagic, S. Gomez, Anwar C Wilson, D. Resnick","doi":"10.5580/2527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Asthma is a chronic obstructive airway disease affecting children and adults world wide. Patients often seek alternative therapies.Objective: We conducted this study to describe osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunct to traditional therapies in acute asthma exacerbation.Methods: A sample of previously diagnosed asthma patients who were having an acute asthma exacerbation were offered to receive OMT treatment as an adjunct to traditional modalities of treatment for acute exacerbation. Each patient was given an albuterol nebulizer treatment followed by an accepted OMT technique known as “rib raising” maneuver for five minutes. Peak flows were obtained before and after each treatment. Each patient was asked to fill out a symptom score diary rating their asthma symptoms before nebulizer treatment, after nebulizer treatment and after OMT.Results: The data showed an average increase in peak flow rates after nebulizer treatment was 36 L/min with a further average increase in peak flow after OMT of 18 L/min with a net increase of 54 L/min (ANOVA, p<0.05). OMT was not associated with any adverse effects or complaints. Study patients reported that the combined nebulizer and OMT treatments made them feel better than in the past when they were offered only traditional albuterol nebulizer treatments. Conclusion: Patients treated for acute asthma exacerbation with nebulizer treatment followed by osteopathic treatment (rib raising maneuver) showed significant improvement in their overall breathing. Unfortunately, lack of a control group in which there would be nebulizer treatment plus no osteopathic treatment makes it uncertain whether this OMT treatment had more than a placebo effect. However, since more patients request alternative therapies more research in OMT techniques should be considered. Offering osteopathic treatments as adjunct to traditional asthma treatment in an acute setting appears to have no adverse effects and may have psychological benefits.","PeriodicalId":161194,"journal":{"name":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2527","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Asthma is a chronic obstructive airway disease affecting children and adults world wide. Patients often seek alternative therapies.Objective: We conducted this study to describe osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) as an adjunct to traditional therapies in acute asthma exacerbation.Methods: A sample of previously diagnosed asthma patients who were having an acute asthma exacerbation were offered to receive OMT treatment as an adjunct to traditional modalities of treatment for acute exacerbation. Each patient was given an albuterol nebulizer treatment followed by an accepted OMT technique known as “rib raising” maneuver for five minutes. Peak flows were obtained before and after each treatment. Each patient was asked to fill out a symptom score diary rating their asthma symptoms before nebulizer treatment, after nebulizer treatment and after OMT.Results: The data showed an average increase in peak flow rates after nebulizer treatment was 36 L/min with a further average increase in peak flow after OMT of 18 L/min with a net increase of 54 L/min (ANOVA, p<0.05). OMT was not associated with any adverse effects or complaints. Study patients reported that the combined nebulizer and OMT treatments made them feel better than in the past when they were offered only traditional albuterol nebulizer treatments. Conclusion: Patients treated for acute asthma exacerbation with nebulizer treatment followed by osteopathic treatment (rib raising maneuver) showed significant improvement in their overall breathing. Unfortunately, lack of a control group in which there would be nebulizer treatment plus no osteopathic treatment makes it uncertain whether this OMT treatment had more than a placebo effect. However, since more patients request alternative therapies more research in OMT techniques should be considered. Offering osteopathic treatments as adjunct to traditional asthma treatment in an acute setting appears to have no adverse effects and may have psychological benefits.
在动态哮喘发作时,沙丁胺醇雾化治疗中加入整骨疗法干预
背景:哮喘是一种影响全世界儿童和成人的慢性阻塞性气道疾病。患者经常寻求替代疗法。目的:我们进行了这项研究,以描述骨科手法治疗(OMT)作为传统治疗急性哮喘加重的辅助疗法。方法:对先前诊断为急性哮喘加重的哮喘患者进行抽样,并提供OMT治疗作为传统急性加重治疗方式的辅助治疗。每位患者均给予沙丁胺醇雾化器治疗,然后进行公认的OMT技术,即“肋骨抬高”操作5分钟。每次处理前后均获得峰值流量。每位患者被要求填写一份症状评分日记,对他们在雾化器治疗前、雾化器治疗后和OMT后的哮喘症状进行评分。结果:数据显示雾化器处理后的峰值流量平均增加36 L/min, OMT处理后的峰值流量平均增加18 L/min,净增加54 L/min(方差分析,p<0.05)。OMT与任何不良反应或投诉无关。研究患者报告说,雾化器和OMT联合治疗比过去只提供传统沙丁胺醇雾化器治疗让他们感觉更好。结论:哮喘急性加重期患者经雾化器治疗后加整骨疗法(肋骨抬高手法),整体呼吸有明显改善。不幸的是,缺乏一个对照组,在对照组中,雾化器治疗不加骨科治疗,使得这种OMT治疗是否比安慰剂效果更不确定。然而,由于越来越多的患者要求替代疗法,应该考虑更多的OMT技术研究。提供整骨疗法作为传统哮喘治疗的辅助,在急性环境下似乎没有不良反应,可能有心理上的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信