Conservative Censors, Banned Books: Reading the Reports of Australia’s Commonwealth Literature Censorship Board

Naish Gawen
{"title":"Conservative Censors, Banned Books: Reading the Reports of Australia’s Commonwealth Literature Censorship Board","authors":"Naish Gawen","doi":"10.31273/REINVENTION.V12I1.432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Australian government’s strict censorship regime of the mid-twentieth century banned a range of imported books, from popular to pornographic to literary titles. Drawing on the archived censor reports of the committee, this article will argue that Australia’s Commonwealth Literature Censorship Board is best understood within a tradition of conservative thinking about literature’s social function which can be traced back to Matthew Arnold. This paper examines the banning of James Baldwin’s Another Country as an example of politically conservative anxieties about race and sexuality influencing the impetus behind the censor’s decisions. It is argued that the Australian censorship project was underwritten by an ideological notion of what literature is, and how it should serve the interests of the state.  \n  \nTo cite this paper please use the following details: Gawen, N. (2019), 'Conservative Censors, Banned Books: Reading the Reports of Australia’s Commonwealth Literature Censorship Board', Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research, Volume 12, Issue 1, https://reinventionjournal.org/article/view/432/391. Date accessed [insert date]. If you cite this article or use it in any teaching or other related activities please let us know by e-mailing us at Reinventionjournal@warwick.ac.uk.","PeriodicalId":183531,"journal":{"name":"Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31273/REINVENTION.V12I1.432","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Australian government’s strict censorship regime of the mid-twentieth century banned a range of imported books, from popular to pornographic to literary titles. Drawing on the archived censor reports of the committee, this article will argue that Australia’s Commonwealth Literature Censorship Board is best understood within a tradition of conservative thinking about literature’s social function which can be traced back to Matthew Arnold. This paper examines the banning of James Baldwin’s Another Country as an example of politically conservative anxieties about race and sexuality influencing the impetus behind the censor’s decisions. It is argued that the Australian censorship project was underwritten by an ideological notion of what literature is, and how it should serve the interests of the state.    To cite this paper please use the following details: Gawen, N. (2019), 'Conservative Censors, Banned Books: Reading the Reports of Australia’s Commonwealth Literature Censorship Board', Reinvention: an International Journal of Undergraduate Research, Volume 12, Issue 1, https://reinventionjournal.org/article/view/432/391. Date accessed [insert date]. If you cite this article or use it in any teaching or other related activities please let us know by e-mailing us at Reinventionjournal@warwick.ac.uk.
保守派审查者,禁书:阅读澳大利亚联邦文学审查委员会的报告
20世纪中叶,澳大利亚政府严格的审查制度禁止进口一系列书籍,从流行书籍到色情书籍再到文学书籍。本文将根据委员会的存档审查报告,论证澳大利亚联邦文学审查委员会在保守的文学社会功能思想传统中得到最好的理解,这可以追溯到马修·阿诺德。本文将詹姆斯·鲍德温的《另一个国家》(Another Country)的禁播作为政治上保守的种族和性别焦虑影响审查决定背后动力的一个例子。有人认为,澳大利亚的审查制度是基于一种意识形态观念,即什么是文学,文学应该如何为国家利益服务。引用本文请使用以下详细信息:高文,N.(2019),“保守审查,禁书:阅读澳大利亚联邦文学审查委员会的报告”,重塑:本科研究的国际期刊,第12卷,第1期,https://reinventionjournal.org/article/view/432/391。访问日期[insert Date]。如果你引用这篇文章或在任何教学或其他相关活动中使用它,请通过电子邮件Reinventionjournal@warwick.ac.uk告诉我们。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信