ASSESSING A DIGITALISED CITIZEN CONSULTATION PLATFORM BASED ON A QUALITATIVE SURVEY THE CASE OF VALAIS CANTON’S NEW CONSTITUTION

E. Fragnière, Vincent Grèzes, Martine Hofstädter, Dominic Juon, Sherine Seppey, Randolf Ramseyer
{"title":"ASSESSING A DIGITALISED CITIZEN CONSULTATION PLATFORM BASED ON A QUALITATIVE SURVEY THE CASE OF VALAIS CANTON’S NEW CONSTITUTION","authors":"E. Fragnière, Vincent Grèzes, Martine Hofstädter, Dominic Juon, Sherine Seppey, Randolf Ramseyer","doi":"10.33965/es2020_202005c016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The practice of citizens' democratic rights and duties must be questioned at a time when many of our daily customs and rituals are being challenged and redefined by the digital revolution. While retailing has already profoundly altered our daily interactions, any practice related to the exercise of democracy remains very traditional and this seems to be at the root of an ever-increasing disinterest in politics, especially among young people. We had the opportunity, through a qualitative survey, to study this theme in relation to the complete revision of the Constitution of the Canton of Valais in Switzerland. The latter follows a democratic process in which 130 citizens of Valais were elected to revise the Constitution. In addition, a consultation was put online on a platform as a pilot project from 7 November 2019 to 5 January 2020 with the aim of encouraging citizen participation and thus giving a voice to all the inhabitants of Valais. In this paper, we present the main elements of this qualitative survey based on the technique of \"hypothetical scenarios\", conducted among 20 Valais residents interested in politics (the majority of the interviewees did not use the online platform, a minority did, and some of the interviewees are “ stakeholders ” linked to the Constituent project). In addition to the survey based, we also carried out a \"netnographic\" analysis using the 1,235 contributions left on the platform during the pilot project period. The analysis of the transcripts made on the basis of the semi-directive interviews shows an interest in these digital citizen platforms. However, the respondents recognise that the citizens' platform is a first test and that more innovation and testing in this area is needed to involve people who are not currently participating in the democratic debate. This is somewhat confirmed by our netnography, as all the content of the platform has been produced by people with a proven political culture.","PeriodicalId":189678,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on e-Society (ES 2020)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on e-Society (ES 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33965/es2020_202005c016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The practice of citizens' democratic rights and duties must be questioned at a time when many of our daily customs and rituals are being challenged and redefined by the digital revolution. While retailing has already profoundly altered our daily interactions, any practice related to the exercise of democracy remains very traditional and this seems to be at the root of an ever-increasing disinterest in politics, especially among young people. We had the opportunity, through a qualitative survey, to study this theme in relation to the complete revision of the Constitution of the Canton of Valais in Switzerland. The latter follows a democratic process in which 130 citizens of Valais were elected to revise the Constitution. In addition, a consultation was put online on a platform as a pilot project from 7 November 2019 to 5 January 2020 with the aim of encouraging citizen participation and thus giving a voice to all the inhabitants of Valais. In this paper, we present the main elements of this qualitative survey based on the technique of "hypothetical scenarios", conducted among 20 Valais residents interested in politics (the majority of the interviewees did not use the online platform, a minority did, and some of the interviewees are “ stakeholders ” linked to the Constituent project). In addition to the survey based, we also carried out a "netnographic" analysis using the 1,235 contributions left on the platform during the pilot project period. The analysis of the transcripts made on the basis of the semi-directive interviews shows an interest in these digital citizen platforms. However, the respondents recognise that the citizens' platform is a first test and that more innovation and testing in this area is needed to involve people who are not currently participating in the democratic debate. This is somewhat confirmed by our netnography, as all the content of the platform has been produced by people with a proven political culture.
基于定性调查的数字化公民咨询平台评估——以瓦莱州新宪法为例
当我们的许多日常习俗和仪式受到数字革命的挑战和重新定义时,公民民主权利和义务的实践必须受到质疑。虽然零售业已经深刻地改变了我们的日常互动,但任何与民主实践有关的做法仍然非常传统,这似乎是对政治越来越不感兴趣的根源,尤其是在年轻人中。我们有机会通过定性调查来研究这一主题与瑞士瓦莱州宪法全面修订的关系。后者遵循一个民主进程,其中选出130名瓦莱州公民修改宪法。此外,从2019年11月7日至2020年1月5日,作为试点项目,在一个平台上进行了一次咨询,目的是鼓励公民参与,从而让瓦莱州所有居民都有发言权。在本文中,我们基于“假设情景”的技术,在20名对政治感兴趣的瓦莱州居民中进行了这次定性调查的主要要素(大多数受访者没有使用在线平台,少数人使用,一些受访者是与组成项目相关的“利益相关者”)。除了以调查为基础,我们还利用试点项目期间留在平台上的1235份贡献进行了“网络”分析。对基于半指令性访谈的笔录的分析显示,人们对这些数字公民平台很感兴趣。然而,受访者认识到,公民平台是第一次测试,需要在这一领域进行更多的创新和测试,让目前没有参与民主辩论的人参与进来。这在某种程度上得到了我们的网络记录的证实,因为这个平台的所有内容都是由具有成熟政治文化的人制作的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信