Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Integrated Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Breast Cancer Pain Management

Mohammad Rasul Mozafari-Motlagh, H. Nejat, Hasan Tozandehjani, Ali-Akbar Samari
{"title":"Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Integrated Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy in Breast Cancer Pain Management","authors":"Mohammad Rasul Mozafari-Motlagh, H. Nejat, Hasan Tozandehjani, Ali-Akbar Samari","doi":"10.30699/ijbd.13.1.35","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Given the high comorbidity of mental conditions and chronic pain in cancer, there is a need for development and administration of interventions for this population. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mindfulness-integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy (MiCBT) in breast cancer pain management. Methods: In this clinical trial, 24 patients with breast cancer from Omid Hospital in Mashhad were selected via a purposive sampling method and randomly assigned to two groups of intervention (N = 12) and control (N = 12). The participants were assessed using the Short Cancer Pain Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention. The participants in the intervention group received MiCBT for 8 weeks. The control group did not receive any intervention from the research team during the research period. Descriptive statistics (percentage, frequency, mean and standard deviation), chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariate analysis of covariance were used for data analysis. Results: After controlling for the pretest scores, there were significant differences between control and intervention groups in perceived pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy immediately and one month after the intervention (P > 0.001). The perceived pain, pain catastrophizing decreased and pain self-efficacy increased immediately and one month after the intervention (P > 0.001). Eta square showed 0.85,0.78 and 0.70 change in perceived pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy immediately and one month. In the follow-up phase, Eta squre were 0.87,0.75 and 0.79 for perceived pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy respectively. Conclusion: MiCBT is effective in improving pain, pain self-efficacy, and pain catastrophe in patients with breast cancer. Therefore, considering the costeffectiveness and availability, this program is recommended as a complementary treatment for breast cancer patients.","PeriodicalId":405995,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Quarterly Journal of Breast Diseases","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Quarterly Journal of Breast Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30699/ijbd.13.1.35","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Introduction: Given the high comorbidity of mental conditions and chronic pain in cancer, there is a need for development and administration of interventions for this population. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of mindfulness-integrated cognitive-behavioral therapy (MiCBT) in breast cancer pain management. Methods: In this clinical trial, 24 patients with breast cancer from Omid Hospital in Mashhad were selected via a purposive sampling method and randomly assigned to two groups of intervention (N = 12) and control (N = 12). The participants were assessed using the Short Cancer Pain Scale, Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire, and Pain Catastrophizing Scale before, immediately after, and one month after the intervention. The participants in the intervention group received MiCBT for 8 weeks. The control group did not receive any intervention from the research team during the research period. Descriptive statistics (percentage, frequency, mean and standard deviation), chi-square tests, t-tests, and multivariate analysis of covariance were used for data analysis. Results: After controlling for the pretest scores, there were significant differences between control and intervention groups in perceived pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy immediately and one month after the intervention (P > 0.001). The perceived pain, pain catastrophizing decreased and pain self-efficacy increased immediately and one month after the intervention (P > 0.001). Eta square showed 0.85,0.78 and 0.70 change in perceived pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy immediately and one month. In the follow-up phase, Eta squre were 0.87,0.75 and 0.79 for perceived pain, pain catastrophizing, and pain self-efficacy respectively. Conclusion: MiCBT is effective in improving pain, pain self-efficacy, and pain catastrophe in patients with breast cancer. Therefore, considering the costeffectiveness and availability, this program is recommended as a complementary treatment for breast cancer patients.
正念-认知-行为综合疗法在乳腺癌疼痛管理中的效果
导言:鉴于癌症患者的精神疾病和慢性疼痛的高合并症,有必要为这一人群开发和管理干预措施。本研究旨在探讨正念整合认知行为疗法(MiCBT)在乳腺癌疼痛管理中的有效性。方法:本临床试验采用目的抽样方法,选取来自马什哈德市奥米德医院的24例乳腺癌患者,随机分为干预组(N = 12)和对照组(N = 12)。在干预前、干预后和干预后1个月分别采用短期癌症疼痛量表、疼痛自我效能问卷和疼痛灾难化量表对参与者进行评估。干预组接受MiCBT治疗8周。对照组在研究期间不接受研究小组的任何干预。采用描述性统计(百分比、频率、均值和标准差)、卡方检验、t检验和多变量协方差分析进行数据分析。结果:在对前测得分进行控制后,干预组与对照组在干预后即刻和1个月的疼痛感知、疼痛灾难化和疼痛自我效能感上均有显著差异(P > 0.001)。干预后即刻及1个月,患者的疼痛感知、疼痛灾难化程度降低,疼痛自我效能感提高(P > 0.001)。知觉疼痛、疼痛灾难化和疼痛自我效能在立即和一个月内的变化分别为0.85、0.78和0.70。在随访阶段,感知疼痛、疼痛灾难化和疼痛自我效能的Eta平方分别为0.87、0.75和0.79。结论:MiCBT能有效改善乳腺癌患者的疼痛、疼痛自我效能感和疼痛突变。因此,考虑到成本效益和可获得性,建议将该方案作为乳腺癌患者的补充治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信