Smart Cities: Practitioners’ Understanding and Expectations: Results from a Qualitative Study in the City of Koblenz

Roman Antoschin, M. Wimmer
{"title":"Smart Cities: Practitioners’ Understanding and Expectations: Results from a Qualitative Study in the City of Koblenz","authors":"Roman Antoschin, M. Wimmer","doi":"10.1145/3494193.3494309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Over the last decade, Smart City has become a growing trend in urban development. Cities around the world have developed a Smart City concept and initiated a longer-term transformation in different areas, covered by the Smart City concept. Cities are expecting, among others, that the many potential benefits and improvements through Smart City implementations can reduce urban challenges. Despite this great interest on the part of practitioners and some standardization efforts, different definitions of the term exist in the literature and in practice. Depending on the context, different aspects are focused on, which shape an idiosyncratic understanding of dimensions of Smart City. Beyond that, the understanding of the term in theory and in practice may vary substantially. As a result, there is an inevitable high degree of complexity in the understanding of the term and, consequently, uncertainty among the practitioners. Thus, this study explores practitioners' understanding of Smart City through expert interviews in the city of Koblenz, Germany. The paper provides a first insight into the heterogeneity of the understanding of the term in the context of application and compares it to the basic definitions and conceptual approaches associated with Smart City developments in the academic literature.","PeriodicalId":360191,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3494193.3494309","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the last decade, Smart City has become a growing trend in urban development. Cities around the world have developed a Smart City concept and initiated a longer-term transformation in different areas, covered by the Smart City concept. Cities are expecting, among others, that the many potential benefits and improvements through Smart City implementations can reduce urban challenges. Despite this great interest on the part of practitioners and some standardization efforts, different definitions of the term exist in the literature and in practice. Depending on the context, different aspects are focused on, which shape an idiosyncratic understanding of dimensions of Smart City. Beyond that, the understanding of the term in theory and in practice may vary substantially. As a result, there is an inevitable high degree of complexity in the understanding of the term and, consequently, uncertainty among the practitioners. Thus, this study explores practitioners' understanding of Smart City through expert interviews in the city of Koblenz, Germany. The paper provides a first insight into the heterogeneity of the understanding of the term in the context of application and compares it to the basic definitions and conceptual approaches associated with Smart City developments in the academic literature.
智慧城市:实践者的理解与期望:来自科布伦茨市定性研究的结果
在过去的十年中,智慧城市已经成为城市发展的一个日益增长的趋势。世界各地的城市都提出了智慧城市的概念,并在不同领域发起了一场长期的转型,这就是智慧城市的概念。城市期望通过实施智慧城市带来的许多潜在好处和改进可以减少城市面临的挑战。尽管从业人员对此非常感兴趣,并进行了一些标准化工作,但在文献和实践中存在不同的术语定义。根据不同的背景,不同的方面被关注,这形成了对智慧城市维度的独特理解。除此之外,理论和实践中对该术语的理解可能存在很大差异。因此,在对术语的理解上存在不可避免的高度复杂性,因此,从业者之间存在不确定性。因此,本研究通过对德国科布伦茨市的专家访谈,探讨了实践者对智慧城市的理解。本文首次深入了解了在应用背景下对该术语理解的异质性,并将其与学术文献中与智慧城市发展相关的基本定义和概念方法进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信