Estimating aboveground biomass for different forest types based on Landsat TM measurements

Min Li, J. Qu, X. Hao
{"title":"Estimating aboveground biomass for different forest types based on Landsat TM measurements","authors":"Min Li, J. Qu, X. Hao","doi":"10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2009.5293408","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Forest aboveground biomass (AGB) is an important variable for evaluating ecosystem functions, assessing fire behaviors and impacts, and understanding global carbon balance. Remote sensing technology provides a feasible way to acquire forest stand information at a reasonable cost with acceptable accuracy. This study utilized reflectance in six non-thermal Landsat TM bands and a variety of vegetation indices to identify the relationships between TM data and AGB for different forest types. The field AGB data for testing and validation was from Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) datasets of Georgia forests. The forests were classified to softwoods, hardwoods and mixed forests. The strength of correlation between AGB and TM reflectance and vegetation indices was calculated. Multiple regression analyses were used to develop AGB estimation models. The results indicated that vegetation index was better predictive variable than TM single band reflectance in AGB estimation. The vegetation indices including three or more TM bands were more strongly correlated with AGB and more commonly used in AGB estimation models. Different forest types have different relationships between TM data and AGB. The best TM bands in AGB estimation for different forest types are: TM7 and TM1 for hardwoods forests, TM1 and TM5 for softwoods forests, TM3 and TM5 for mixed forests. Potential errors in our AGB estimates could be associated with effects of soil background, the accuracy of land cover data and sampling errors. The possible way to improve the estimation accuracy can be integration of different sources of remotely sensed data or more stand structure information.","PeriodicalId":121212,"journal":{"name":"2009 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 17th International Conference on Geoinformatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/GEOINFORMATICS.2009.5293408","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Forest aboveground biomass (AGB) is an important variable for evaluating ecosystem functions, assessing fire behaviors and impacts, and understanding global carbon balance. Remote sensing technology provides a feasible way to acquire forest stand information at a reasonable cost with acceptable accuracy. This study utilized reflectance in six non-thermal Landsat TM bands and a variety of vegetation indices to identify the relationships between TM data and AGB for different forest types. The field AGB data for testing and validation was from Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) datasets of Georgia forests. The forests were classified to softwoods, hardwoods and mixed forests. The strength of correlation between AGB and TM reflectance and vegetation indices was calculated. Multiple regression analyses were used to develop AGB estimation models. The results indicated that vegetation index was better predictive variable than TM single band reflectance in AGB estimation. The vegetation indices including three or more TM bands were more strongly correlated with AGB and more commonly used in AGB estimation models. Different forest types have different relationships between TM data and AGB. The best TM bands in AGB estimation for different forest types are: TM7 and TM1 for hardwoods forests, TM1 and TM5 for softwoods forests, TM3 and TM5 for mixed forests. Potential errors in our AGB estimates could be associated with effects of soil background, the accuracy of land cover data and sampling errors. The possible way to improve the estimation accuracy can be integration of different sources of remotely sensed data or more stand structure information.
基于Landsat TM测量估算不同森林类型的地上生物量
森林地上生物量(AGB)是评价生态系统功能、评价火灾行为和影响、了解全球碳平衡的重要变量。遥感技术为以合理的成本和可接受的精度获取林分信息提供了一种可行的方法。本研究利用6个非热Landsat TM波段的反射率和多种植被指数来识别不同森林类型TM数据与AGB的关系。用于测试和验证的现场AGB数据来自格鲁吉亚森林的森林清查和分析(FIA)数据集。森林类型分为针叶林、阔叶林和混交林。计算AGB、TM反射率与植被指数的相关强度。采用多元回归分析建立AGB估计模型。结果表明,在AGB估算中,植被指数是比TM单波段反射率更好的预测变量。包含3个及以上TM波段的植被指数与AGB的相关性更强,更常用于AGB估算模型。不同森林类型的TM数据与AGB之间存在不同的关系。不同林型估计AGB的最佳TM波段为:阔叶林的TM7和TM1,针叶林的TM1和TM5,混交林的TM3和TM5。我们的AGB估计的潜在误差可能与土壤背景、土地覆盖数据的准确性和抽样误差的影响有关。提高估算精度的可能途径是整合不同来源的遥感数据或更多的林分结构信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信