ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF ONLINE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT MODELS AND DELIVERY MODES

Walid Salameh
{"title":"ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF ONLINE LEARNING: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF DIFFERENT MODELS AND DELIVERY MODES","authors":"Walid Salameh","doi":"10.53555/eijhss.v8i3.148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This qualitative inquiry seeks to gauge the success of diverse internet-based learning platforms and modes of delivery on student results. The investigation commences with a comprehensive review of literature, considering key elements such as pedagogical layout, technology assimilation, and support services for learners that foster an increase in the caliber of digital schooling. Making use of qualitative approaches, this study amasses perspectives from both students and educators via interviews and discussion groups to comprehend their respective experiences and viewpoints pertaining to varied e-learning techniques. The results underscore strengths and weaknesses present within asynchronous, synchronous, and hybrid learning methods while emphasizing the importance of ongoing enhancement in the sphere of online education. This scholarly investigation offers critical enlightenments for academic professionals and decision-makers aiming at amplifying internet-based educational initiatives thereby guaranteeing a profound impact on each student's scholastic progression.","PeriodicalId":109852,"journal":{"name":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EPH - International Journal of Humanities and Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53555/eijhss.v8i3.148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This qualitative inquiry seeks to gauge the success of diverse internet-based learning platforms and modes of delivery on student results. The investigation commences with a comprehensive review of literature, considering key elements such as pedagogical layout, technology assimilation, and support services for learners that foster an increase in the caliber of digital schooling. Making use of qualitative approaches, this study amasses perspectives from both students and educators via interviews and discussion groups to comprehend their respective experiences and viewpoints pertaining to varied e-learning techniques. The results underscore strengths and weaknesses present within asynchronous, synchronous, and hybrid learning methods while emphasizing the importance of ongoing enhancement in the sphere of online education. This scholarly investigation offers critical enlightenments for academic professionals and decision-makers aiming at amplifying internet-based educational initiatives thereby guaranteeing a profound impact on each student's scholastic progression.
评估在线学习的质量:不同模式和交付模式的比较分析
这项定性调查旨在评估各种基于互联网的学习平台和交付模式对学生成绩的影响。调查从对文献的全面回顾开始,考虑了教学布局、技术同化和为学习者提供支持服务等关键因素,这些因素促进了数字教育水平的提高。本研究采用定性方法,通过访谈和讨论小组收集学生和教育工作者的观点,以了解他们各自关于各种电子学习技术的经验和观点。研究结果强调了异步、同步和混合学习方法的优点和缺点,同时强调了在线教育领域持续改进的重要性。这项学术调查为学术专家和决策者提供了重要的启示,旨在扩大基于互联网的教育举措,从而保证对每个学生的学业进步产生深远的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信