Modified dynamic programming based unit commitment technique

Joonhyung Park, Sun-kyo Kim, Geun-Pyo Park, Y. Yoon, Sang-Seung Lee
{"title":"Modified dynamic programming based unit commitment technique","authors":"Joonhyung Park, Sun-kyo Kim, Geun-Pyo Park, Y. Yoon, Sang-Seung Lee","doi":"10.1109/PES.2010.5588184","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper represents a modified dynamic programming solution to the unit commitment (UC) problem. The UC is a complex decision-making process because of multiple constraints which may not be violated while finding the optimal or suboptimal commitment schedule. There are many methods to solve the UC problem gradually. So, before we present our method, we will show the drawbacks of the standard dynamic programming methods which use general purpose optimization techniques to the UC problem. The priority list method, the lagrange relaxation and the mixed integer linear programming (MILP) are possible to apply to a real power system for performing the unit commitment. However, by using these methods, we could not get an optimal solution but only a suboptimal silution. Therefore we propose to get an optimal solution by using dynamic programming. Performing dynamic programming takes a lot of simulation time, so it is not optimal to use in a real power system for performing the unit commitment. Therefore, we need a modified dynamic programming method to satisfy both the simulated and the real power system to get the optimal solution. For those not familiar with UC problem, we introduce the constraints, production cost and start-up cost. The goal of the objective function is in cost minimization, so we use the economic dispatch using the lambda iteration method when we calculate the production costs. Finally, we compare the UC solution by using both methods.","PeriodicalId":177545,"journal":{"name":"IEEE PES General Meeting","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE PES General Meeting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PES.2010.5588184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

This paper represents a modified dynamic programming solution to the unit commitment (UC) problem. The UC is a complex decision-making process because of multiple constraints which may not be violated while finding the optimal or suboptimal commitment schedule. There are many methods to solve the UC problem gradually. So, before we present our method, we will show the drawbacks of the standard dynamic programming methods which use general purpose optimization techniques to the UC problem. The priority list method, the lagrange relaxation and the mixed integer linear programming (MILP) are possible to apply to a real power system for performing the unit commitment. However, by using these methods, we could not get an optimal solution but only a suboptimal silution. Therefore we propose to get an optimal solution by using dynamic programming. Performing dynamic programming takes a lot of simulation time, so it is not optimal to use in a real power system for performing the unit commitment. Therefore, we need a modified dynamic programming method to satisfy both the simulated and the real power system to get the optimal solution. For those not familiar with UC problem, we introduce the constraints, production cost and start-up cost. The goal of the objective function is in cost minimization, so we use the economic dispatch using the lambda iteration method when we calculate the production costs. Finally, we compare the UC solution by using both methods.
改进的基于动态规划的单元承诺技术
提出了一种改进的动态规划方法来解决机组投入问题。UC是一个复杂的决策过程,因为在寻找最优或次优承诺时间表时存在多个约束条件,这些约束条件可能不被违反。逐步解决UC问题的方法有很多。因此,在我们提出我们的方法之前,我们将展示使用通用优化技术来解决UC问题的标准动态规划方法的缺点。优先列表法、拉格朗日松弛法和混合整数线性规划(MILP)可以应用于实际电力系统执行机组承诺。然而,使用这些方法,我们不能得到最优解,而只能得到次优解。因此,我们提出用动态规划的方法求出最优解。进行动态规划需要大量的仿真时间,因此在实际电力系统中执行机组承诺并不是最优的。因此,我们需要一种改进的动态规划方法来同时满足模拟和实际电力系统的需求,从而得到最优解。对于不熟悉UC问题的人,我们介绍了约束条件、生产成本和启动成本。目标函数的目标是成本最小化,因此在计算生产成本时,我们使用lambda迭代法进行经济调度。最后,我们比较了使用这两种方法的UC解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信