{"title":"Future Options of the Kurds.1 Part I: The Current Situation","authors":"Ferdinand Hennerbichler","doi":"10.4236/AA.2018.83009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Iraqi Kurdistan independence referendum on September, 25, 2017, initiated by Masoud Barzani, former elected President of the Kurdistan Region Iraq (KRI) (in office: June 13, 2005 to August 19, 2015) was not intended as the basis for a declaration of an independent Kurdish state in Northern Iraq in the foreseeable future. It was, rather, aimed at strengthening his own domestic political position as well as that of other leading politicians of the Barzani family and of the Kurdistan Democratic Party Iraq, currently leading the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG). The referendum aggravated the persisting constitutional crisis in Iraq since 2005 over as-yet unresolved crucial questions, above all regarding the status of Kirkuk and other “disputed territories”. The Iraqi Kurds lost to a great extent their influence over Kirkuk and about 40% of other “disputed territories” they were controlling before. On the regional domestic front, it polarized antagonisms among rivalling Kurdish parties, threatened to split the KRI again into two separate administrations and also deepened the ongoing severe economic KRG crisis. In geostrategic terms, it enabled the Islamic Republic of Iran to further extend its influence on Iraq and beyond effectively towards the eastern Mediterranean via pro-Iranian Shia-proxy-militias and, last but not least, it also intensified various crises in the Middle East and Eurasia2.","PeriodicalId":149660,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Anthropology","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4236/AA.2018.83009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Iraqi Kurdistan independence referendum on September, 25, 2017, initiated by Masoud Barzani, former elected President of the Kurdistan Region Iraq (KRI) (in office: June 13, 2005 to August 19, 2015) was not intended as the basis for a declaration of an independent Kurdish state in Northern Iraq in the foreseeable future. It was, rather, aimed at strengthening his own domestic political position as well as that of other leading politicians of the Barzani family and of the Kurdistan Democratic Party Iraq, currently leading the Kurdish Regional Government (KRG). The referendum aggravated the persisting constitutional crisis in Iraq since 2005 over as-yet unresolved crucial questions, above all regarding the status of Kirkuk and other “disputed territories”. The Iraqi Kurds lost to a great extent their influence over Kirkuk and about 40% of other “disputed territories” they were controlling before. On the regional domestic front, it polarized antagonisms among rivalling Kurdish parties, threatened to split the KRI again into two separate administrations and also deepened the ongoing severe economic KRG crisis. In geostrategic terms, it enabled the Islamic Republic of Iran to further extend its influence on Iraq and beyond effectively towards the eastern Mediterranean via pro-Iranian Shia-proxy-militias and, last but not least, it also intensified various crises in the Middle East and Eurasia2.
2017年9月25日,伊拉克库尔德斯坦独立公投由伊拉克库尔德斯坦地区(KRI)前当选总统马苏德·巴尔扎尼(Masoud Barzani,任期:2005年6月13日至2015年8月19日)发起,并不是为了在可预见的未来在伊拉克北部宣布一个独立的库尔德国家。相反,这是为了加强他自己的国内政治地位,以及目前领导库尔德地区政府(KRG)的巴尔扎尼家族和伊拉克库尔德斯坦民主党(Kurdistan Democratic Party Iraq)的其他主要政治家的政治地位。自2005年以来,由于一些尚未解决的关键问题,尤其是基尔库克和其他“争议领土”的地位问题,公投加剧了伊拉克持续存在的宪法危机。伊拉克库尔德人在很大程度上失去了对基尔库克的影响力,以及他们之前控制的约40%的其他“争议领土”。在地区国内方面,它使对立的库尔德政党之间的对立两极分化,威胁要将KRI再次分裂为两个独立的政府,并加深了KRG目前严重的经济危机。在地缘战略方面,它使伊朗伊斯兰共和国能够通过亲伊朗的什叶派代理民兵进一步扩大其对伊拉克和其他地区的影响,有效地向地中海东部延伸,最后但并非最不重要的是,它还加剧了中东和欧亚的各种危机2。