INFLUENCE OF BREEDING METHODS AND AGE OF DANISH SOWS ON THEIR PRODUCTIVITY

M. Povod, О. Mykhalko, V. Andreychuk
{"title":"INFLUENCE OF BREEDING METHODS AND AGE OF DANISH SOWS ON THEIR PRODUCTIVITY","authors":"M. Povod, О. Mykhalko, V. Andreychuk","doi":"10.32900/2312-8402-2021-125-161-179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article compares the reproductive qualities of sows of Danish selection obtained by different breeding methods during their seven farrowings in one farm. It was found that local sows F1 obtained from mothers of Landrace breed and boars of Danish Large White breed had a significant excess of the total number of piglets at birth over analogs obtained by backcrossing of two-breed sows with boars of Danish Landrace breed by 0.90 head or 5.92 % (p<0,001). Both purebred sows of Danish Landrace and local sows significantly exceeded their peers obtained by the method of backcrossing by the number of stillborn piglets by 1.17 heads or 45.88% (p<0.001) and 0.5 heads or 26.60% (p<0.001) respectively. The probable lag of sows obtained by backcrossing in terms of the proportion of stillborn piglets from both purebred analogs by 5.03% (p<0.05) and from local analogs – by 9.29% (p<0.05). The complex indicator of reproductive qualities, calculated as an evaluation index, showed that the best such qualities were possessed by livestock for purebred breeding, where animals scored 0.05 and 0.74 points more than their peers F1 and Fr, respectively. The calculation of the estimated selection index of reproductive qualities of sows allowed to state that sows obtained from backcrossing had a higher value of 109.66 points, which is more than their purebred peers – by 4.48 points and local peers – by 3.96 points. According to the results of the first farrowing, a significant difference in the total number of piglets at birth, fertility, number of piglets at weaning, safety, nest weight at weaning, the weight of 1 head at weaning between livestock groups is not established but found that purebred sows relative to analogs obtained from backcrossing had a significantly higher number of stillborn piglets by 0.75 head or 60.00% (p<0.01) and the proportion of stillborn piglets by 5.09% (p<0.01). Evaluation of the data of the second, fourth, fifth and seventh farrowings revealed no significant difference in the bulk of the indicators of reproductive qualities of sows between the livestock of all groups. The study of the third farrowing allowed claiming that the number of stillborn piglets in this period was probably higher in sows of the first control group relative to analogs of the second experimental (F1) by 0.73 heads or 31.88% (p<0,05) and relative to analogs Experimental III (Fr) by 0.97 heads or 42.36% (p<0.01). According to the sixth farrowing piglets of the II experimental group (F1) exceeded the number of births by 1,77 heads or 12.46% (p<0.05) – control analogs, the fertility rate – by 2.32 heads or 19.66% (p<0.01) – analogs of the control and 1.41 head or 9.99% (p<0.05) – analogs of the III experimental group (Fr), but at the same time inferior in terms of safety to peers of the control group by 13.25% (p<0.01). Intergroup analysis of data showed that during the sixth farrowing piglets of the II experimental group (F1) exceeded the fertility rate – by 2.32 heads or 19.66% (p<0.01) – control analogs and 1.41 heads or 9.99% (p<0.05) – analogs of the III experimental group (Fr). The study of the dynamics of absolute, average daily, and relative growth of piglets revealed that both in the control group (purebred Danish Landrace) and in the third experimental group (Fr) in terms of seven farrowings, the indicators did not differ statistically. However, piglets of group II (F1) during the sixth farrowing had the highest values: the absolute increase was 6.18 kg, exceeding the first by 0.58 kg or 10.36% (p <0.05), the average daily gain – 221 g, which is higher than the average for the first farrowing in the group by 20 g or 10.50 % (p<0.05) and a relative increase of 138.62%, which is higher than the results of the first by 7.23% (p <0.01).","PeriodicalId":156452,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science NAAS of Ukraine","volume":"810 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific and Technical Bulletin of the Institute of Animal Science NAAS of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32900/2312-8402-2021-125-161-179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The article compares the reproductive qualities of sows of Danish selection obtained by different breeding methods during their seven farrowings in one farm. It was found that local sows F1 obtained from mothers of Landrace breed and boars of Danish Large White breed had a significant excess of the total number of piglets at birth over analogs obtained by backcrossing of two-breed sows with boars of Danish Landrace breed by 0.90 head or 5.92 % (p<0,001). Both purebred sows of Danish Landrace and local sows significantly exceeded their peers obtained by the method of backcrossing by the number of stillborn piglets by 1.17 heads or 45.88% (p<0.001) and 0.5 heads or 26.60% (p<0.001) respectively. The probable lag of sows obtained by backcrossing in terms of the proportion of stillborn piglets from both purebred analogs by 5.03% (p<0.05) and from local analogs – by 9.29% (p<0.05). The complex indicator of reproductive qualities, calculated as an evaluation index, showed that the best such qualities were possessed by livestock for purebred breeding, where animals scored 0.05 and 0.74 points more than their peers F1 and Fr, respectively. The calculation of the estimated selection index of reproductive qualities of sows allowed to state that sows obtained from backcrossing had a higher value of 109.66 points, which is more than their purebred peers – by 4.48 points and local peers – by 3.96 points. According to the results of the first farrowing, a significant difference in the total number of piglets at birth, fertility, number of piglets at weaning, safety, nest weight at weaning, the weight of 1 head at weaning between livestock groups is not established but found that purebred sows relative to analogs obtained from backcrossing had a significantly higher number of stillborn piglets by 0.75 head or 60.00% (p<0.01) and the proportion of stillborn piglets by 5.09% (p<0.01). Evaluation of the data of the second, fourth, fifth and seventh farrowings revealed no significant difference in the bulk of the indicators of reproductive qualities of sows between the livestock of all groups. The study of the third farrowing allowed claiming that the number of stillborn piglets in this period was probably higher in sows of the first control group relative to analogs of the second experimental (F1) by 0.73 heads or 31.88% (p<0,05) and relative to analogs Experimental III (Fr) by 0.97 heads or 42.36% (p<0.01). According to the sixth farrowing piglets of the II experimental group (F1) exceeded the number of births by 1,77 heads or 12.46% (p<0.05) – control analogs, the fertility rate – by 2.32 heads or 19.66% (p<0.01) – analogs of the control and 1.41 head or 9.99% (p<0.05) – analogs of the III experimental group (Fr), but at the same time inferior in terms of safety to peers of the control group by 13.25% (p<0.01). Intergroup analysis of data showed that during the sixth farrowing piglets of the II experimental group (F1) exceeded the fertility rate – by 2.32 heads or 19.66% (p<0.01) – control analogs and 1.41 heads or 9.99% (p<0.05) – analogs of the III experimental group (Fr). The study of the dynamics of absolute, average daily, and relative growth of piglets revealed that both in the control group (purebred Danish Landrace) and in the third experimental group (Fr) in terms of seven farrowings, the indicators did not differ statistically. However, piglets of group II (F1) during the sixth farrowing had the highest values: the absolute increase was 6.18 kg, exceeding the first by 0.58 kg or 10.36% (p <0.05), the average daily gain – 221 g, which is higher than the average for the first farrowing in the group by 20 g or 10.50 % (p<0.05) and a relative increase of 138.62%, which is higher than the results of the first by 7.23% (p <0.01).
丹麦母猪繁殖方式和母猪年龄对其生产能力的影响
本文比较了丹麦选种母猪在同一猪场7次产仔时不同育种方法获得的繁殖品质。结果表明,长白母猪与丹麦大白母猪杂交获得的F1母猪产仔数比两种母猪与丹麦长白母猪回交获得的F1母猪产仔数高出0.90头或5.92% (p< 0.001)。丹麦长白纯种母猪和地方母猪的死胎数均显著高于回交法获得的同类母猪,分别高出1.17头(45.88%)和0.5头(26.60%)(p<0.001)。在死产仔猪比例方面,回交母猪与纯种类似物相比可能落后5.03% (p<0.05),与本地类似物相比可能落后9.29% (p<0.05)。计算繁殖品质综合指标作为评价指标,纯种家畜的繁殖品质最好,其F1和Fr分别比同类家畜高0.05和0.74分。对母猪生殖品质的估计选择指数进行了计算,结果表明回交母猪的选择指数为109.66分,比纯种母猪高出4.48分,比本地母猪高出3.96分。根据首次产犊结果,仔猪出生总数、育仔率、断奶仔猪数、安全性、断奶窝重、断奶1头重各组间差异不显著,但纯种母猪的死产仔猪数较回杂交母猪显著提高了0.75头或60.00% (p<0.01),死产仔猪比例显著提高了5.09% (p<0.01)。对第2、4、5、7次产犊数据的评价显示,各组母猪繁殖品质的大部分指标没有显著差异。第三次产羔的研究表明,该时期第一对照组母猪的死产仔猪数可能比第二试验类似物(F1)高0.73头或31.88% (p< 0.05),比试验III (Fr)高0.97头或42.36% (p<0.01)。第6次产仔时,II试验组(F1)的产仔数比对照类似物多出1,77头(12.46%)(p<0.05),产仔率比对照类似物多出2.32头(19.66%)(p<0.01),比III试验组(Fr)的产仔率多出1.41头(9.99%)(p<0.05),但安全性比对照组低13.25% (p<0.01)。组间数据分析表明,第6次分娩时,II试验组(F1)比对照类似物产仔率高出2.32头(19.66%),III试验组(Fr)比对照类似物产仔率高出1.41头(9.99%),p<0.05。对仔猪绝对生长、平均日生长和相对生长动态的研究表明,对照组(纯种丹麦长白猪)和第三试验组(Fr)在7次产胎方面,各项指标均无统计学差异。第二组(F1)仔猪在第6次分娩时的绝对增重为6.18 kg,比第1次分娩时增加0.58 kg或10.36% (p<0.05),平均日增重为221 g,比第1次分娩时增加20 g或10.50% (p<0.05),相对增加138.62%,比第1次分娩时增加7.23% (p< 0.01)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信