Selected Methods of optimized Sampling for Index Tracking – Evidence from German Stocks

F. Meyer-Bullerdiek
{"title":"Selected Methods of optimized Sampling for Index Tracking – Evidence from German Stocks","authors":"F. Meyer-Bullerdiek","doi":"10.47260/jafb/1268","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\n\nThe aim of this study is to verify the tracking quality of four different optimization approaches used for approximate replication (sampling) of a stock index. These approaches include relative optimization, optimization according to Markowitz, the use of regression methods and linear optimization. To test the tracking qualities of these strategies, an empirical analysis of portfolios of 10 stocks included in the German stock index DAX is used to determine the in-sample and out-of-sample results. In addition, a portfolio composition based on market capitalization and an equally weighted portfolio are considered.\nThe analysis shows that the in-sample results are quite similar for all index tracking methods used in this study. Considering the out-of-sample results, it can be stated that all four index tracking methods lead to a portfolio that initially shows a high degree of similarity to the benchmark. However, it is surprising that the equally weighted portfolio leads to the best overall results. Therefore, the analysis presented here gives the impression that the uncomplicated equal weighting is preferable to the more sophisticated index tracking methods considered in this study.\n\nJEL classification number: G11.\nKeywords: Index tracking, Sampling, Optimization, Tracking error, Residual risk.","PeriodicalId":330012,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Finance & Banking","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Finance & Banking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47260/jafb/1268","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The aim of this study is to verify the tracking quality of four different optimization approaches used for approximate replication (sampling) of a stock index. These approaches include relative optimization, optimization according to Markowitz, the use of regression methods and linear optimization. To test the tracking qualities of these strategies, an empirical analysis of portfolios of 10 stocks included in the German stock index DAX is used to determine the in-sample and out-of-sample results. In addition, a portfolio composition based on market capitalization and an equally weighted portfolio are considered. The analysis shows that the in-sample results are quite similar for all index tracking methods used in this study. Considering the out-of-sample results, it can be stated that all four index tracking methods lead to a portfolio that initially shows a high degree of similarity to the benchmark. However, it is surprising that the equally weighted portfolio leads to the best overall results. Therefore, the analysis presented here gives the impression that the uncomplicated equal weighting is preferable to the more sophisticated index tracking methods considered in this study. JEL classification number: G11. Keywords: Index tracking, Sampling, Optimization, Tracking error, Residual risk.
指数跟踪的最佳抽样选择方法——来自德国股票的证据
摘要本研究的目的是验证用于股票指数近似复制(抽样)的四种不同优化方法的跟踪质量。这些方法包括相对优化、根据马科维茨的优化、使用回归方法和线性优化。为了检验这些策略的跟踪质量,对德国DAX指数中包含的10只股票的投资组合进行了实证分析,以确定样本内和样本外结果。此外,还考虑了基于市值的投资组合构成和等加权投资组合。分析表明,本研究中使用的所有指数跟踪方法的样本内结果非常相似。考虑到样本外的结果,可以说,所有四种指数跟踪方法导致的投资组合最初显示出与基准的高度相似。然而,令人惊讶的是,同等权重的投资组合带来了最好的总体结果。因此,本文给出的分析给人的印象是,不复杂的等权重比本研究中考虑的更复杂的指标跟踪方法更可取。JEL分类号:G11。关键词:指标跟踪,抽样,优化,跟踪误差,剩余风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信