Fatigue and stress responses in athletes performing functional-fitness workout and its association with well-being

A. Zecchin, Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto, Marcel Frezza Pisa, R. Aquino, Enrico Fuini Puggina
{"title":"Fatigue and stress responses in athletes performing functional-fitness workout and its association with well-being","authors":"A. Zecchin, Omero Benedicto Poli-Neto, Marcel Frezza Pisa, R. Aquino, Enrico Fuini Puggina","doi":"10.54392/ijpefs2323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We monitored fatigue and stress using heart rate variability and session rating perceived exertion in trained athletes performing a single bout of functional-fitness training workout. Also, we verified the association between heart rate variability and session rating perceived exertion with well-being. In the first week of tapering, eleven national athletes (age: 25.7 ± 3.3y; body mass index: 27.7 ± 2.8 kg·m-2; training history: > 4y) participated in this study. Heart rate variability was analyzed basal, before and after the experimental protocol. Session rating perceived exertion was analyzed after the experimental protocol, and after the assessments, the association between them and well-being was performed. Repeated measures of ANOVA were performed to compare condition x time, and Pearson correlation was used to analyze the associations. Heart rate variability decreased its values after the training workout (ηp2=11.5, p<0.001), and session rating perceived exertion was high (25.8 ± 6.9 a.u.). We did not find associations between heart rate variability or session rating perceived exertion and well-being (r between -0.34 and 0.35, p>0.05). This study did not support the idea of a significant relationship between objective/subjective, physiological assessments and well-being in one bout of training workout. Functional-fitness coaches and athletes should know the limited evidence about objective/subjective assessments and well-being.","PeriodicalId":110668,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Physical Education, Fitness and Sports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54392/ijpefs2323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We monitored fatigue and stress using heart rate variability and session rating perceived exertion in trained athletes performing a single bout of functional-fitness training workout. Also, we verified the association between heart rate variability and session rating perceived exertion with well-being. In the first week of tapering, eleven national athletes (age: 25.7 ± 3.3y; body mass index: 27.7 ± 2.8 kg·m-2; training history: > 4y) participated in this study. Heart rate variability was analyzed basal, before and after the experimental protocol. Session rating perceived exertion was analyzed after the experimental protocol, and after the assessments, the association between them and well-being was performed. Repeated measures of ANOVA were performed to compare condition x time, and Pearson correlation was used to analyze the associations. Heart rate variability decreased its values after the training workout (ηp2=11.5, p<0.001), and session rating perceived exertion was high (25.8 ± 6.9 a.u.). We did not find associations between heart rate variability or session rating perceived exertion and well-being (r between -0.34 and 0.35, p>0.05). This study did not support the idea of a significant relationship between objective/subjective, physiological assessments and well-being in one bout of training workout. Functional-fitness coaches and athletes should know the limited evidence about objective/subjective assessments and well-being.
运动员进行功能性健身训练时的疲劳和压力反应及其与健康的关系
我们使用心率变异性和对训练有素的运动员进行单次功能性健身训练时感知运动强度的评分来监测疲劳和压力。此外,我们验证了心率变异性和会话等级感知运动与幸福感之间的关联。减量第一周,11名国家运动员(年龄:25.7±3.3岁;体质指数:27.7±2.8 kg·m-2;培训历史:> 4y)参加本研究。在实验方案之前和之后,分析了基础心率变异性。在实验方案完成后,分析会话等级感知劳累,并在评估后,执行它们与幸福感之间的关联。采用重复方差分析比较条件x时间,并采用Pearson相关分析相关性。训练后心率变异性值降低(ηp2=11.5, p0.05)。这项研究不支持客观/主观、生理评估和幸福感在一次训练中有显著关系的观点。功能性健身教练和运动员应该知道关于客观/主观评估和健康的有限证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信