The Development of Judicial Precedents of the Supreme Court on the Interpretation of Definition of the term ‘Farmland’ in Farmland Act and Some Issues Concerned Explanatory and Critical Notes to the Decision of ‘the Supreme Court 2021.8.19. sentence 2020두30665’

Ji Su Kim
{"title":"The Development of Judicial Precedents of the Supreme Court on the Interpretation of Definition of the term ‘Farmland’ in Farmland Act and Some Issues Concerned Explanatory and Critical Notes to the Decision of ‘the Supreme Court 2021.8.19. sentence 2020두30665’","authors":"Ji Su Kim","doi":"10.38133/cnulawreview.2022.42.4.211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article is aimed to survey the development of judicial precedents of the Supreme Court on the interpretation of definition of the term ‘farmland’ in Farmland Act and give some critical comments to the decision of ‘the Supreme Court 2021. 8. 19. sentence 2020두30665’. The author would like to indicate some issues on definition of the term ‘farmland’ and try to find some possible way out. The 1st chap. is introduction, and the 2nd chap. will look into the purpose of Farmland Act & basic ideology concerning farmland according to stipulated provisions in the text, will indicate the indistinction of meaning of definition of the term ‘farmland’ and its historical development, and try to confirm the tradition of present condition test of ‘farmland’. The 3rd chap. is a main chap. of this article, will survey the development of judicial precedents of the Supreme Court on the interpretation of definition of the term ‘farmland’. Main contents are as follows: judicial decisions on ‘farmland’ or not according to the Farmland Reform Act 1949, decisions which affirm or deny the ‘farmland’ on farmland preservation charges, decisions on unlawful diversion of farmland, and decisions on being ‘farmland’ as a required condition of issuance of qualificationc certificates for acquisition of farmland. The 4th chap. will search the subtle changes of three recent judicial decisions. Main contents as follows: the critical comments on the last decision i.e. ‘the Supreme Court 2021. 8. 19. sentence 2020두30665’, including the details of the case, judgments of first trial & second trial, reversal of the Supreme Court, results of reversal, and author’s critical review on it. The 5th chap. is conclusion of this paper, will point out some important points why men contest at law whether being farmland or not, and suggest some possible alternative ideas.","PeriodicalId":288398,"journal":{"name":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","volume":"87 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institute for Legal Studies Chonnam National University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38133/cnulawreview.2022.42.4.211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article is aimed to survey the development of judicial precedents of the Supreme Court on the interpretation of definition of the term ‘farmland’ in Farmland Act and give some critical comments to the decision of ‘the Supreme Court 2021. 8. 19. sentence 2020두30665’. The author would like to indicate some issues on definition of the term ‘farmland’ and try to find some possible way out. The 1st chap. is introduction, and the 2nd chap. will look into the purpose of Farmland Act & basic ideology concerning farmland according to stipulated provisions in the text, will indicate the indistinction of meaning of definition of the term ‘farmland’ and its historical development, and try to confirm the tradition of present condition test of ‘farmland’. The 3rd chap. is a main chap. of this article, will survey the development of judicial precedents of the Supreme Court on the interpretation of definition of the term ‘farmland’. Main contents are as follows: judicial decisions on ‘farmland’ or not according to the Farmland Reform Act 1949, decisions which affirm or deny the ‘farmland’ on farmland preservation charges, decisions on unlawful diversion of farmland, and decisions on being ‘farmland’ as a required condition of issuance of qualificationc certificates for acquisition of farmland. The 4th chap. will search the subtle changes of three recent judicial decisions. Main contents as follows: the critical comments on the last decision i.e. ‘the Supreme Court 2021. 8. 19. sentence 2020두30665’, including the details of the case, judgments of first trial & second trial, reversal of the Supreme Court, results of reversal, and author’s critical review on it. The 5th chap. is conclusion of this paper, will point out some important points why men contest at law whether being farmland or not, and suggest some possible alternative ideas.
《农地法》中“农地”定义解释的最高法院司法判例发展及若干问题——对最高法院2021.8.19号判决书的解释和批注。2020年12月30日
本文旨在考察大法院关于《农地法》中“农地”定义解释的司法判例的发展,并对“2021年大法院的决定”提出一些批判性的评论。8. 19. 句子2020[30665]。本文就“农田”一词的定义问题进行了探讨,并试图找到一些可能的解决之道。第一章为绪论,第二章将根据本文的规定,探讨《农地法》的宗旨和有关农地的基本思想,指出“农地”一词定义的含义模糊及其历史发展,并试图确认“农地”现状检验的传统。第三章是本文的主要部分,综述了最高法院关于“农田”定义解释的司法判例的发展。主要内容有:根据1949年《农地改革法》对“农地”是否认定的司法判决、对农地保持费认定或否定“农地”的司法判决、对非法挪用农地的司法判决、对作为取得农地资格证书的必要条件的司法判决。第四章将探讨最近三个司法判决的微妙变化。主要内容如下:对“最高法院2021年判决”的批评性评论。8. 19. 全文包括案件的详细情况、一审和二审的判决、最高法院的判决结果、判决结果以及作者对案件的批判性评论。第五章是本文的结语,将指出男性是否为耕地而在法律上争论的几个要点,并提出一些可能的替代思路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信