楊起元的思想發展及其對師門之學的塑造

詹前倬 詹前倬
{"title":"楊起元的思想發展及其對師門之學的塑造","authors":"詹前倬 詹前倬","doi":"10.53106/160759942021120037002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n 活躍於十六世紀下半葉的楊起元是泰州大儒羅汝芳的弟子。他於師教篤信弗疑,承繼與推廣師學的努力亦廣為傳頌,李贄言楊氏之學「大抵皆本父師之言而推衍之」。不過,前輩學者已經注意到楊、羅之間的思想間距。本文關注楊起元的思想發展,特重其師學塑造,以測定楊氏與其師思想與學說的距離。楊起元於羅汝芳過世後參與兩次師學塑造運動。第一次發生在羅汝芳的喪禮之上,同門弟子咸集驗證所得,以「明德」私諡羅汝芳,也以此為師門宗旨理解羅汝芳之學。喪禮後數年,楊起元閱讀其師遺集而感悟於「孝」,因此開啟《孝經》編纂工程。楊氏藉此發揚羅汝芳的孝弟慈論,但是比起羅氏孝論的源頭《大學》,他更為推崇《孝經》,也認為該經更為契合羅氏之學。師門孝論的核心經典,在楊起元手上完成從《大學》到《孝經》的轉換,是為楊氏參與的第二度師學塑造。本文認為,楊起元的案例顯示陽明學發展至十六世紀末,愈發鼓勵思想學說落實成具物質性之文本,而楊氏所塑造的師門之學正是在落實的過程中,漸與羅汝芳之學分離開來。\n This paper examines the development of Yang Qiyuan’s (1547-99) thought with a special focus on his efforts in reshaping the learning of his master, Luo Rufang (1515-88), in order to assess the distance between the teachings of the two. Yang participated twice in events to reshape the teachings of his master. The first time was at the funeral for Luo Rufang, when Yang and the other disciples assembled together to consolidate Luo’s legacy. On their own they gave him the posthumous title of “Bright Virtue,” taken from the Great Learning, and regarded this as a representative element of Luo Rufang’s teachings. Years after the funeral, while reading through the master’s remaining works, Yang came to realize the significance of filial piety, and thereupon began a project to compile the Classic of Filial Piety, in which he emphasized the themes of filial piety, fraternity and kindness in Luo’s teachings. While Luo’s theories on filial piety were based upon the Great Learning, Yang instead pointed to the Classic of Filial Piety as more suited for Luo’s teachings. Thus, changing the textual basis for Luo’s theories on filial piety was Yang’s second reshaping of his master’s legacy. This essay argues that the case of Yang Qiyuan illustrates Wang Yangmingism (1472-1529) at the end of the sixteenth century developed to emphasize on rendering doctrine into textual form. Yang’s reshaping of his master’s legacy was part of this process, and led him to part ways with his master’s original teachings.\n \n","PeriodicalId":160957,"journal":{"name":"明代研究","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"明代研究","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53106/160759942021120037002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

活躍於十六世紀下半葉的楊起元是泰州大儒羅汝芳的弟子。他於師教篤信弗疑,承繼與推廣師學的努力亦廣為傳頌,李贄言楊氏之學「大抵皆本父師之言而推衍之」。不過,前輩學者已經注意到楊、羅之間的思想間距。本文關注楊起元的思想發展,特重其師學塑造,以測定楊氏與其師思想與學說的距離。楊起元於羅汝芳過世後參與兩次師學塑造運動。第一次發生在羅汝芳的喪禮之上,同門弟子咸集驗證所得,以「明德」私諡羅汝芳,也以此為師門宗旨理解羅汝芳之學。喪禮後數年,楊起元閱讀其師遺集而感悟於「孝」,因此開啟《孝經》編纂工程。楊氏藉此發揚羅汝芳的孝弟慈論,但是比起羅氏孝論的源頭《大學》,他更為推崇《孝經》,也認為該經更為契合羅氏之學。師門孝論的核心經典,在楊起元手上完成從《大學》到《孝經》的轉換,是為楊氏參與的第二度師學塑造。本文認為,楊起元的案例顯示陽明學發展至十六世紀末,愈發鼓勵思想學說落實成具物質性之文本,而楊氏所塑造的師門之學正是在落實的過程中,漸與羅汝芳之學分離開來。  This paper examines the development of Yang Qiyuan’s (1547-99) thought with a special focus on his efforts in reshaping the learning of his master, Luo Rufang (1515-88), in order to assess the distance between the teachings of the two. Yang participated twice in events to reshape the teachings of his master. The first time was at the funeral for Luo Rufang, when Yang and the other disciples assembled together to consolidate Luo’s legacy. On their own they gave him the posthumous title of “Bright Virtue,” taken from the Great Learning, and regarded this as a representative element of Luo Rufang’s teachings. Years after the funeral, while reading through the master’s remaining works, Yang came to realize the significance of filial piety, and thereupon began a project to compile the Classic of Filial Piety, in which he emphasized the themes of filial piety, fraternity and kindness in Luo’s teachings. While Luo’s theories on filial piety were based upon the Great Learning, Yang instead pointed to the Classic of Filial Piety as more suited for Luo’s teachings. Thus, changing the textual basis for Luo’s theories on filial piety was Yang’s second reshaping of his master’s legacy. This essay argues that the case of Yang Qiyuan illustrates Wang Yangmingism (1472-1529) at the end of the sixteenth century developed to emphasize on rendering doctrine into textual form. Yang’s reshaping of his master’s legacy was part of this process, and led him to part ways with his master’s original teachings.  
杨起元的思想发展及其对师门之学的塑造
活跃于十六世纪下半叶的杨起元是泰州大儒罗汝芳的弟子。他于师教笃信弗疑,承继与推广师学的努力亦广为传颂,李贽言杨氏之学「大抵皆本父师之言而推衍之」。不过,前辈学者已经注意到杨、罗之间的思想间距。本文关注杨起元的思想发展,特重其师学塑造,以测定杨氏与其师思想与学说的距离。杨起元于罗汝芳过世后参与两次师学塑造运动。第一次发生在罗汝芳的丧礼之上,同门弟子咸集验证所得,以「明德」私谥罗汝芳,也以此为师门宗旨理解罗汝芳之学。丧礼后数年,杨起元阅读其师遗集而感悟于「孝」,因此开启《孝经》编纂工程。杨氏借此发扬罗汝芳的孝弟慈论,但是比起罗氏孝论的源头《大学》,他更为推崇《孝经》,也认为该经更为契合罗氏之学。师门孝论的核心经典,在杨起元手上完成从《大学》到《孝经》的转换,是为杨氏参与的第二度师学塑造。本文认为,杨起元的案例显示阳明学发展至十六世纪末,愈发鼓励思想学说落实成具物质性之文本,而杨氏所塑造的师门之学正是在落实的过程中,渐与罗汝芳之学分离开来。 This paper examines the development of Yang Qiyuan’s (1547-99) thought with a special focus on his efforts in reshaping the learning of his master, Luo Rufang (1515-88), in order to assess the distance between the teachings of the two. Yang participated twice in events to reshape the teachings of his master. The first time was at the funeral for Luo Rufang, when Yang and the other disciples assembled together to consolidate Luo’s legacy. On their own they gave him the posthumous title of “Bright Virtue,” taken from the Great Learning, and regarded this as a representative element of Luo Rufang’s teachings. Years after the funeral, while reading through the master’s remaining works, Yang came to realize the significance of filial piety, and thereupon began a project to compile the Classic of Filial Piety, in which he emphasized the themes of filial piety, fraternity and kindness in Luo’s teachings. While Luo’s theories on filial piety were based upon the Great Learning, Yang instead pointed to the Classic of Filial Piety as more suited for Luo’s teachings. Thus, changing the textual basis for Luo’s theories on filial piety was Yang’s second reshaping of his master’s legacy. This essay argues that the case of Yang Qiyuan illustrates Wang Yangmingism (1472-1529) at the end of the sixteenth century developed to emphasize on rendering doctrine into textual form. Yang’s reshaping of his master’s legacy was part of this process, and led him to part ways with his master’s original teachings.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信