ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT IN NON-CORE SUBJECTS AMONG STUDENTS OF PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY (BASED ON A SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY)

N. Zakorkina
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF THE LEVEL OF COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT IN NON-CORE SUBJECTS AMONG STUDENTS OF PEDAGOGICAL UNIVERSITY (BASED ON A SOCIOLOGICAL SURVEY)","authors":"N. Zakorkina","doi":"10.21045/2071-5021-2022-68-6-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significance. Introduction of non-core subjects into the curriculum of pedagogical universities, in particular, “Fundamentals of Medical Knowledge” is fraught with greatest difficulties. On the one hand, this is a subject that does not develop any professional competences of students, it is of an introductory nature only. On the other hand, acquiring practical skills in first aid, students should know a clear algorithm of medical actions and remember it until the end of their studies at the university. The purpose of the study. To analyze the level of competence development in first aid provision. Маtеrial and methods. A survey of two groups of students was conducted: the 1st group – the first-year students who have completed “Fundamentals of Medical Knowledge” at the end of the academic year (2021), a total of 98 students; the 2nd group - graduate students (2021), who studied this subject also in the first year, i.e. 4 years ago, a total of 103 students. The method of random selection was used. All students answered 29 questions anonymously. The sampling error on the questionnaire questions did not exceed 5%. To analyze data of the sociological survey, an alternative analysis (extensive indicators) was used, and to identify cause-and-effect relationships a correlation analysis was undertaken. Reliability of the correlation coefficient was assessed using tabular standard values. Results. The majority of the respondents in both the 1st group (94.9%) and the 2nd group (96.1%) consider the non-core subject “Fundamentals of Medical Knowledge” as the need to use the acquired knowledge in future. According to the competence-based approach, the subject is aimed at developing knowledge and skills in managing conditions that can become fatal within a short period of time. Upon completion of the subject in the 1st year, signs of clinical death could be determined by 42.9%, while by the end of the studies at the university - only 8.7%. A similar situation is relevant to first aid for bleeding - 61.2% and 29.1%, respectively. The main reasons why students fail to master the threshold level of competence in first aid are both a feeling of fear, lack of experience, ethical side (vomit, blood), insufficient technical equipment during practicals, as well as the fact that this subject is taught by educators without medical background, which is confirmed by the results and correlation analysis. In addition, the respondents were faced with the approaches that do not correspond to the correct algorithm of actions: 8.2% - in the 1st group and 15.5% - in the 2nd. The level of competence development among students is decreasing, by the end of the university only 8.7% can implement “I know, can do, and master the skill”. Conclusion. The competence-based approach to non-core subjects does not produce the expected result. This is due to the lack of cumulative acquisition of knowledge, competences and skill throughout the study process at the university, insufficient technical equipment during practicals and the fact that the subject is taught by specialists without relevant background. Scope of application. The data obtained can be used to develop state educational standards.","PeriodicalId":279998,"journal":{"name":"Social Aspects of Population Health","volume":"58 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Aspects of Population Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21045/2071-5021-2022-68-6-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Significance. Introduction of non-core subjects into the curriculum of pedagogical universities, in particular, “Fundamentals of Medical Knowledge” is fraught with greatest difficulties. On the one hand, this is a subject that does not develop any professional competences of students, it is of an introductory nature only. On the other hand, acquiring practical skills in first aid, students should know a clear algorithm of medical actions and remember it until the end of their studies at the university. The purpose of the study. To analyze the level of competence development in first aid provision. Маtеrial and methods. A survey of two groups of students was conducted: the 1st group – the first-year students who have completed “Fundamentals of Medical Knowledge” at the end of the academic year (2021), a total of 98 students; the 2nd group - graduate students (2021), who studied this subject also in the first year, i.e. 4 years ago, a total of 103 students. The method of random selection was used. All students answered 29 questions anonymously. The sampling error on the questionnaire questions did not exceed 5%. To analyze data of the sociological survey, an alternative analysis (extensive indicators) was used, and to identify cause-and-effect relationships a correlation analysis was undertaken. Reliability of the correlation coefficient was assessed using tabular standard values. Results. The majority of the respondents in both the 1st group (94.9%) and the 2nd group (96.1%) consider the non-core subject “Fundamentals of Medical Knowledge” as the need to use the acquired knowledge in future. According to the competence-based approach, the subject is aimed at developing knowledge and skills in managing conditions that can become fatal within a short period of time. Upon completion of the subject in the 1st year, signs of clinical death could be determined by 42.9%, while by the end of the studies at the university - only 8.7%. A similar situation is relevant to first aid for bleeding - 61.2% and 29.1%, respectively. The main reasons why students fail to master the threshold level of competence in first aid are both a feeling of fear, lack of experience, ethical side (vomit, blood), insufficient technical equipment during practicals, as well as the fact that this subject is taught by educators without medical background, which is confirmed by the results and correlation analysis. In addition, the respondents were faced with the approaches that do not correspond to the correct algorithm of actions: 8.2% - in the 1st group and 15.5% - in the 2nd. The level of competence development among students is decreasing, by the end of the university only 8.7% can implement “I know, can do, and master the skill”. Conclusion. The competence-based approach to non-core subjects does not produce the expected result. This is due to the lack of cumulative acquisition of knowledge, competences and skill throughout the study process at the university, insufficient technical equipment during practicals and the fact that the subject is taught by specialists without relevant background. Scope of application. The data obtained can be used to develop state educational standards.
师范院校学生非核心学科能力发展水平评价(基于社会学调查)
的意义。在师范大学课程中引入非核心科目,特别是“医学知识基础”,困难重重。一方面,这是一门不培养学生任何专业能力的学科,它只是一门入门性质的课程。另一方面,获得实用的急救技能,学生应该知道一个明确的医疗行为算法,并记住它,直到他们在大学学习结束。研究的目的。分析急救服务能力发展水平。Маtеrial和方法。对两组学生进行了调查:第一组-在学年(2021年)结束时完成“医学基础知识”的一年级学生,共有98名学生;第二组是研究生(2021),他们也是在第一年,即4年前学习了这门学科,共有103名学生。采用随机选择的方法。所有学生匿名回答了29个问题。问卷问题的抽样误差不超过5%。为了分析社会学调查的数据,采用了另一种分析方法(广泛指标),并进行了相关分析来确定因果关系。采用表格标准值评估相关系数的信度。结果。第一组(94.9%)及第二组(96.1%)的受访学生均认为非核心科目“医学基础知识”是日后需要运用所学知识的科目。根据以能力为基础的方法,该主题旨在发展管理可能在短时间内致命的疾病的知识和技能。在第一年完成课程后,42.9%的人可以确定临床死亡的迹象,而在大学学习结束时,这一比例仅为8.7%。类似的情况与出血急救相关,分别为61.2%和29.1%。学生未能掌握急救能力阈值的主要原因有恐惧感、缺乏经验、伦理方面(呕吐、流血)、实习时技术设备不足,以及本学科由非医学背景的教育工作者授课,结果和相关分析证实了这一点。此外,受访者面临的方法不符合正确的行动算法:第一组为8.2%,第二组为15.5%。大学生的能力发展水平不断下降,到大学毕业时,只有8.7%的学生能实现“我知道、能做、能掌握”。结论。以能力为基础的方法对非核心科目没有产生预期的结果。这是由于在大学的整个学习过程中缺乏知识、能力和技能的积累,在实践中缺乏技术设备,以及这门学科是由没有相关背景的专家教授的。适用范围。获得的数据可用于制定州教育标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信