{"title":"Is Groton the Next Evenwel?","authors":"P. Edelman","doi":"10.36644/mlr.online.117.groton","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Evenwel v. Abbott the Supreme Court left open the question of whether states could employ population measures other than total population as a basis for drawing representative districts so as to meet the requirement of \"one person, one vote\" (OPOV). It was thought that there was little prospect of resolving this question soon as no appropriate instances of such behavior were known. That belief was mistaken. In this Essay I report on the Town of Groton, Connecticut, which uses registered voter data to apportion seats in its Representative Town Meeting and has done so since its incorporation in 1957. The resulting apportionment arguably meets the requirements of OPOV as applied to registered voter data but badly fails if total population is employed. Thus, it would make a good test case to resolve some of the open questions in Evenwel.","PeriodicalId":393000,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Law Review Online","volume":"234 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Law Review Online","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36644/mlr.online.117.groton","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In Evenwel v. Abbott the Supreme Court left open the question of whether states could employ population measures other than total population as a basis for drawing representative districts so as to meet the requirement of "one person, one vote" (OPOV). It was thought that there was little prospect of resolving this question soon as no appropriate instances of such behavior were known. That belief was mistaken. In this Essay I report on the Town of Groton, Connecticut, which uses registered voter data to apportion seats in its Representative Town Meeting and has done so since its incorporation in 1957. The resulting apportionment arguably meets the requirements of OPOV as applied to registered voter data but badly fails if total population is employed. Thus, it would make a good test case to resolve some of the open questions in Evenwel.
在Evenwel v. Abbott一案中,最高法院对各州是否可以采用除总人口以外的人口指标作为划分代表选区的依据,以满足“一人一票”(OPOV)的要求,留下了一个悬而未决的问题。人们认为,由于不知道这种行为的适当实例,因此很快解决这个问题的可能性很小。这种想法是错误的。在这篇文章中,我报告了康涅狄格州格罗顿镇,该镇自1957年成立以来一直使用登记选民数据来分配其代表镇会议的席位。由此产生的分配可以说符合适用于登记选民数据的OPOV的要求,但如果使用总人口,则严重失败。因此,它将成为一个很好的测试用例来解决evenwell中的一些开放问题。