Labels’ Standard Deviation in Energy Performance Certificates: Portuguese Housing

N. Cortiços
{"title":"Labels’ Standard Deviation in Energy Performance Certificates: Portuguese Housing","authors":"N. Cortiços","doi":"10.20900/jsr20210019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) went from a solely bureaucratic process to a differentiating factor capable of raising a property’s value. The regulation, as conceived, is thoroughly suitable for new buildings, given their characteristics and available information. Contrary to the aging building stock, which lacks documentation and construction evidence. Surveys demonstrate pressure on qualified assessors to deliver higher EPC labels. The assessor tends to increase the grade to the detriment of a more rigorous approach aligned with the regulatory guidelines, raising the property market value, and benefitting building owners. The research oversees 30 EPCs, strictly following the regulation criteria, and concluded a global (−)8.77% average against the official EPCs, representing (−)21.93% on a 250% scale, which should not change the (letter) grade, except when close to the threshold. The following tendency shows different behavior considering the “C” threshold, when above lowers by (−)7.70% and under that level and including increases by (−)34.37% on the same scale against official EPCs: mainly, upon the uncertainty of isolation presence on opaque façade elements. The study outcome unveils a defaulted regulation mechanism introduced in 2013 (and reset in 2021), the “Simplification Rules”, which intended to surpass the lack of technical information with a prudent judgment by assessors, but became a popular shortcut on existing buildings, representing 16/30 of the random research sample.","PeriodicalId":275909,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Sustainability Research","volume":"57 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Sustainability Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20900/jsr20210019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Energy Performance Certificates (EPC) went from a solely bureaucratic process to a differentiating factor capable of raising a property’s value. The regulation, as conceived, is thoroughly suitable for new buildings, given their characteristics and available information. Contrary to the aging building stock, which lacks documentation and construction evidence. Surveys demonstrate pressure on qualified assessors to deliver higher EPC labels. The assessor tends to increase the grade to the detriment of a more rigorous approach aligned with the regulatory guidelines, raising the property market value, and benefitting building owners. The research oversees 30 EPCs, strictly following the regulation criteria, and concluded a global (−)8.77% average against the official EPCs, representing (−)21.93% on a 250% scale, which should not change the (letter) grade, except when close to the threshold. The following tendency shows different behavior considering the “C” threshold, when above lowers by (−)7.70% and under that level and including increases by (−)34.37% on the same scale against official EPCs: mainly, upon the uncertainty of isolation presence on opaque façade elements. The study outcome unveils a defaulted regulation mechanism introduced in 2013 (and reset in 2021), the “Simplification Rules”, which intended to surpass the lack of technical information with a prudent judgment by assessors, but became a popular shortcut on existing buildings, representing 16/30 of the random research sample.
能源性能证书标签的标准偏差:葡萄牙住房
能源绩效证书(EPC)从一个纯粹的官僚程序变成了一个能够提高物业价值的差异化因素。考虑到新建筑的特点和现有信息,该规定完全适用于新建筑。与老化的建筑存量相反,缺乏文件和施工证据。调查显示,合格的评估人员面临着提供更高EPC标签的压力。评估员倾向于增加等级,而不利于更严格的方法与监管指导方针相一致,提高房地产市场价值,并使建筑物所有者受益。该研究监督了30家epc,严格遵守监管标准,与官方epc相比,全球平均(-)8.77%,在250%的范围内代表(-)21.93%,不应该改变(字母)等级,除非接近阈值。考虑到“C”阈值,以下趋势表现出不同的行为,当高于(-)7.70%时,低于该水平,包括在相同尺度上比官方epc增加(-)34.37%:主要是由于不透明farade元素的隔离存在的不确定性。研究结果揭示了2013年引入的默认监管机制(并于2021年重新设置),即“简化规则”,旨在通过评估人员的审慎判断来克服技术信息的缺乏,但成为现有建筑的流行捷径,代表了随机研究样本的16/30。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信