Climate Change Transition Risk on Sovereign Bond Markets

Sierra Collender, Christina Sklibosios Nikitopoulos, Kylie-Anne Richards, L. Ryan
{"title":"Climate Change Transition Risk on Sovereign Bond Markets","authors":"Sierra Collender, Christina Sklibosios Nikitopoulos, Kylie-Anne Richards, L. Ryan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3861350","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We challenge the narrative that climate change transition risk is not being priced into sovereign bond markets. As measured by carbon dioxide emissions, natural resources rents and renewable energy consumption, climate change transition risk is factored into sovereign bond yields (and spreads) by investors. Using a sample of data from 23 advanced and 16 developing markets from 2000-2019, we show that countries with lower carbon emissions incur a lower risk premium on sovereign borrowing costs. Moreover, advanced countries willing to reduce their earnings from natural resources rents and, to some extent, increase renewable energy consumption are associated with lower sovereign borrowing costs. In contrast, developing countries with a strong dependence on natural resources or restricted renewable energy consumption incur lower sovereign borrowing costs. Thus, advanced economies that perform poorly in managing their climate transition may encounter increased sovereign borrowing costs, liquidity constraints, reduced capacity to effectively manage climate transition and the inability to finance economic recovery from severe climate shocks or natural disasters. The necessity to support developing countries to meet climate change targets also emerges. Given the threat climate change poses to the global economy and the fact that transition risk is materialized much faster than physical risk, we advocate an increase in the significance of climate transition risk factors as determinants of sovereign bond markets.","PeriodicalId":320822,"journal":{"name":"Development Economics: Agriculture","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Economics: Agriculture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3861350","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

We challenge the narrative that climate change transition risk is not being priced into sovereign bond markets. As measured by carbon dioxide emissions, natural resources rents and renewable energy consumption, climate change transition risk is factored into sovereign bond yields (and spreads) by investors. Using a sample of data from 23 advanced and 16 developing markets from 2000-2019, we show that countries with lower carbon emissions incur a lower risk premium on sovereign borrowing costs. Moreover, advanced countries willing to reduce their earnings from natural resources rents and, to some extent, increase renewable energy consumption are associated with lower sovereign borrowing costs. In contrast, developing countries with a strong dependence on natural resources or restricted renewable energy consumption incur lower sovereign borrowing costs. Thus, advanced economies that perform poorly in managing their climate transition may encounter increased sovereign borrowing costs, liquidity constraints, reduced capacity to effectively manage climate transition and the inability to finance economic recovery from severe climate shocks or natural disasters. The necessity to support developing countries to meet climate change targets also emerges. Given the threat climate change poses to the global economy and the fact that transition risk is materialized much faster than physical risk, we advocate an increase in the significance of climate transition risk factors as determinants of sovereign bond markets.
主权债券市场的气候变化转型风险
我们对主权债券市场没有将气候变化转型风险纳入定价的说法提出质疑。以二氧化碳排放量、自然资源租金和可再生能源消耗来衡量,气候变化转型风险已被投资者计入主权债券收益率(和息差)。利用2000年至2019年来自23个发达市场和16个发展中市场的数据样本,我们发现碳排放较低的国家主权借贷成本的风险溢价较低。此外,发达国家愿意减少自然资源租金收入,并在一定程度上增加可再生能源消费,这与较低的主权借贷成本有关。相比之下,高度依赖自然资源或限制可再生能源消费的发展中国家的主权借贷成本较低。因此,在气候转型管理方面表现不佳的发达经济体可能会面临主权借贷成本上升、流动性受限、有效管理气候转型的能力下降以及无法为严重气候冲击或自然灾害后的经济复苏提供资金的问题。支持发展中国家实现气候变化目标的必要性也出现了。鉴于气候变化对全球经济构成的威胁,以及转型风险具体化的速度远快于物理风险,我们主张提高气候转型风险因素作为主权债券市场决定因素的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信