Repetition of Writing Topics in the Secondary School Certificate Examination and Students' Dependence on Memorisation

Injamamul Sarwer, A. Haque
{"title":"Repetition of Writing Topics in the Secondary School Certificate Examination and Students' Dependence on Memorisation","authors":"Injamamul Sarwer, A. Haque","doi":"10.36832/beltaj.2019.0301.06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper reports on a study that explored the issue of repetition of writing topics in the SSC examination in Bangladesh and students‘ dependence of memorisation. In order to investigate to what extent writing topics are repeated in the SSC examination and what the students‘ attitudes are towards memorisation of the writing items, the present quantitative study sampled 116 students through a questionnaire. Moreover, English question papers of seven years‘ SSC examination were analysed through quantitative content analysis. The study found out that the same or similar writing topics were repeated frequently in the SSC examination, and as a washback effect of this, most of the students made a short list of the probable writing topics and memorised them from guidebooks. As a result, the writing items cannot test the ̳construct‘ of the writing test which is the students‘ writing ability; rather it tests the students‘ ability to remember and reproduce. This discrepancy between the curriculum and the actual test testifies the lack of validity of the English writing tests in the SSC examination, since according to Lado (1961), a test is valid only if it measures what it is supposed to measure.","PeriodicalId":142370,"journal":{"name":"BELTA Journal","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BELTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36832/beltaj.2019.0301.06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper reports on a study that explored the issue of repetition of writing topics in the SSC examination in Bangladesh and students‘ dependence of memorisation. In order to investigate to what extent writing topics are repeated in the SSC examination and what the students‘ attitudes are towards memorisation of the writing items, the present quantitative study sampled 116 students through a questionnaire. Moreover, English question papers of seven years‘ SSC examination were analysed through quantitative content analysis. The study found out that the same or similar writing topics were repeated frequently in the SSC examination, and as a washback effect of this, most of the students made a short list of the probable writing topics and memorised them from guidebooks. As a result, the writing items cannot test the ̳construct‘ of the writing test which is the students‘ writing ability; rather it tests the students‘ ability to remember and reproduce. This discrepancy between the curriculum and the actual test testifies the lack of validity of the English writing tests in the SSC examination, since according to Lado (1961), a test is valid only if it measures what it is supposed to measure.
中学毕业证书考试写作主题的重复与学生对记忆的依赖
本文报告了一项研究,探讨了孟加拉国SSC考试中写作主题的重复问题和学生对记忆的依赖。为了调查写作主题在SSC考试中的重复程度以及学生对写作项目记忆的态度,本定量研究通过问卷调查抽样了116名学生。此外,通过定量内容分析,对七年制SSC考试英语试题进行分析。研究发现,在SSC考试中,相同或相似的写作主题被频繁重复,作为反冲效应,大多数学生列出了可能的写作主题的简短列表,并从指南中记忆它们。因此,写作题不能测试写作测试的“结构”,即学生的写作能力;相反,它测试的是学生的记忆和重现能力。课程和实际测试之间的这种差异证明了SSC考试中英语写作测试缺乏有效性,因为根据Lado(1961)的说法,只有当测试测量的是它应该测量的东西时,测试才是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信