Possibility of decentralisation during the year of pandemic: what does the analysis of public budgets reveal?

N. Zubarevich
{"title":"Possibility of decentralisation during the year of pandemic: what does the analysis of public budgets reveal?","authors":"N. Zubarevich","doi":"10.5922/1994-5280-2021-1-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the year of the pandemic transfers from the federal to the regional budgets increased by 50 per cent which led to an increase in budget revenues in most regions and made regional budgets more dependent on federal support. The proportion of earmarked transfers (subventions and subsidies) increased, making reassignment of budgetary funds difficult. The regions were forced to spend additional money on designated projects only, which resulted in further centralisation of budget management. The transfer calculation became less transparent, additional transfers were not linked to the decrease in regional budgets’ own revenues. Before the pandemic, «geopolitically» important regions had been prioritised for federal transfers. In 2020 interpretation of transfer distribution became much more difficult due to the lack of coordination between various federal ministries in their transfer calculations. Budget federalism in Russia had been limited to some freedom in choosing expenditure priorities for the regions, but in the year of the pandemic these opportunities dwindled. Health expenditure and social protectionbecame common priorities because a lot of additional transfers were earmarked for these purposes. Other regional priorities differed but most regions subsidised utility tariffs and increased spending on national economy in order to reach targets of the Presidential Decree. Hopes of decentralisation of the Russian budget system during the pandemic did not come true and regional dependence on the federal authorities increased.","PeriodicalId":148240,"journal":{"name":"Regional nye issledovaniya","volume":"108 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional nye issledovaniya","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5922/1994-5280-2021-1-4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

In the year of the pandemic transfers from the federal to the regional budgets increased by 50 per cent which led to an increase in budget revenues in most regions and made regional budgets more dependent on federal support. The proportion of earmarked transfers (subventions and subsidies) increased, making reassignment of budgetary funds difficult. The regions were forced to spend additional money on designated projects only, which resulted in further centralisation of budget management. The transfer calculation became less transparent, additional transfers were not linked to the decrease in regional budgets’ own revenues. Before the pandemic, «geopolitically» important regions had been prioritised for federal transfers. In 2020 interpretation of transfer distribution became much more difficult due to the lack of coordination between various federal ministries in their transfer calculations. Budget federalism in Russia had been limited to some freedom in choosing expenditure priorities for the regions, but in the year of the pandemic these opportunities dwindled. Health expenditure and social protectionbecame common priorities because a lot of additional transfers were earmarked for these purposes. Other regional priorities differed but most regions subsidised utility tariffs and increased spending on national economy in order to reach targets of the Presidential Decree. Hopes of decentralisation of the Russian budget system during the pandemic did not come true and regional dependence on the federal authorities increased.
大流行期间权力下放的可能性:对公共预算的分析揭示了什么?
在大流行病发生的那一年,联邦预算向区域预算的转移增加了50%,导致大多数区域的预算收入增加,并使区域预算更加依赖联邦的支助。指定用途的转移(补助金和补贴)的比例增加,使重新分配预算资金变得困难。各区域被迫只在指定项目上花额外的钱,这导致预算管理进一步集中。转移的计算变得不那么透明,额外的转移与区域预算本身收入的减少没有联系。在大流行之前,“地缘政治”上重要的地区已被列为联邦转移支付的优先事项。到2020年,由于各联邦部门在转移计算中缺乏协调,转移分配的解释变得更加困难。俄罗斯的预算联邦制仅限于在为各区域选择支出优先事项方面的一些自由,但在大流行病发生的那一年,这些机会减少了。医疗支出和社会保护成为共同的优先事项,因为许多额外的转移支付被指定用于这些目的。其他区域优先事项各不相同,但大多数地区补贴公用事业费用并增加国民经济支出,以达到总统令的目标。大流行期间俄罗斯预算系统分权的希望没有实现,地区对联邦当局的依赖程度有所增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信