Role of single, paired and multiple specimens in the outcome of automated blood culture system – A 2 years study from South India

A. Anjana, Adhikary Ranjeeta, M. Bhavana, H. Beena
{"title":"Role of single, paired and multiple specimens in the outcome of automated blood culture system – A 2 years study from South India","authors":"A. Anjana, Adhikary Ranjeeta, M. Bhavana, H. Beena","doi":"10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_17_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Automated blood culture (BC) system remains the best approach for early definitive management of sepsis. A retrospective analysis of samples received over 2 years was done to compare the sensitivity of single, paired and multiple BC sets. A total of 24,955 samples were received, of which 11,355 were single, 12,555 were paired and 1045 were multiple. BC sensitivity increased from 32.3% to 87% when samples increased from one to two, and a rise of another 13% with four sample sets (P < 0.0001). There is higher chance of missing positives if only a single BC sample was collected.","PeriodicalId":310565,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Safety and Infection Control","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jpsic.jpsic_17_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Automated blood culture (BC) system remains the best approach for early definitive management of sepsis. A retrospective analysis of samples received over 2 years was done to compare the sensitivity of single, paired and multiple BC sets. A total of 24,955 samples were received, of which 11,355 were single, 12,555 were paired and 1045 were multiple. BC sensitivity increased from 32.3% to 87% when samples increased from one to two, and a rise of another 13% with four sample sets (P < 0.0001). There is higher chance of missing positives if only a single BC sample was collected.
单,配对和多个标本在自动血液培养系统结果中的作用-来自南印度的2年研究
自动血培养(BC)系统仍然是早期确定脓毒症管理的最佳方法。对2年内收到的样本进行回顾性分析,比较单组、配对组和多组BC的敏感性。共收到24955份样本,其中单身11355份,配对12555份,多人1045份。当样本从1个增加到2个时,BC敏感性从32.3%增加到87%,当样本集增加到4个时,BC敏感性又增加了13% (P < 0.0001)。如果只收集单个BC样本,则遗漏阳性的机会较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信