What Has Changed in Nature and in the Economy?

S. Grgas
{"title":"What Has Changed in Nature and in the Economy?","authors":"S. Grgas","doi":"10.17234/WPAS.2020.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author begins this article by describing the changed priorities of the present: whereas previously attention was focused on social issues, today it is the environment that has become the focus of human concerns. Although the impact of human actions on nature has been noted in the past, the author argues that today this impact is unprecedented. This can be seen, for example, in the way that contemporary en-gagements with the archive foreground the ecological issue. The author illustrates his disagreement with this practice by glancing at ecologically-minded re-readings of Karl Marx. Turning to American Studies as the disciplinary background of his argument, the author explains the reasons for this focus on Marx. The next step of the paper explores the ecological presence in American Studies before the conclusion, in which the author engages certain works of fiction and shows how he had previously not given sufficient weight to the ecological problematic. long-running claim favoring a regulated productivist been that human ingenuity can find substitutes for all resources and technology can solve all problems allowing humanity to change and adapt to anything. These arguments are made in almost total ignorance of how the economy interacts with ecosystems and impacts their structure and functioning, how dependent economies are on the flow of low entropy materials and energy and what are the basic limits to humans as biological animals. Indeed even ignorance itself is ignored and reduced down to risk and probabilities.","PeriodicalId":191494,"journal":{"name":"Working Papers in American Studies Vol. 4","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Working Papers in American Studies Vol. 4","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17234/WPAS.2020.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The author begins this article by describing the changed priorities of the present: whereas previously attention was focused on social issues, today it is the environment that has become the focus of human concerns. Although the impact of human actions on nature has been noted in the past, the author argues that today this impact is unprecedented. This can be seen, for example, in the way that contemporary en-gagements with the archive foreground the ecological issue. The author illustrates his disagreement with this practice by glancing at ecologically-minded re-readings of Karl Marx. Turning to American Studies as the disciplinary background of his argument, the author explains the reasons for this focus on Marx. The next step of the paper explores the ecological presence in American Studies before the conclusion, in which the author engages certain works of fiction and shows how he had previously not given sufficient weight to the ecological problematic. long-running claim favoring a regulated productivist been that human ingenuity can find substitutes for all resources and technology can solve all problems allowing humanity to change and adapt to anything. These arguments are made in almost total ignorance of how the economy interacts with ecosystems and impacts their structure and functioning, how dependent economies are on the flow of low entropy materials and energy and what are the basic limits to humans as biological animals. Indeed even ignorance itself is ignored and reduced down to risk and probabilities.
自然和经济发生了什么变化?
作者在这篇文章的开头描述了当前的优先事项的变化:以前的注意力集中在社会问题上,而今天它是环境已经成为人类关注的焦点。虽然人类行为对自然的影响在过去已经被注意到,但作者认为,今天这种影响是前所未有的。例如,这可以从当代档案馆对生态问题的关注中看出。作者通过对卡尔·马克思(Karl Marx)的生态思想的重读,阐明了他对这种做法的不同意见。作者将美国研究作为其论证的学科背景,解释了将重点放在马克思身上的原因。在结束语之前,本文的下一步探讨了美国研究中的生态存在,作者在结束语中引用了一些小说作品,并表明他以前没有给予生态问题足够的重视。长期以来,支持受监管的生产主义者的主张是,人类的聪明才智可以找到所有资源的替代品,技术可以解决所有问题,使人类能够改变和适应任何事物。这些论点几乎完全忽视了经济如何与生态系统相互作用,如何影响生态系统的结构和功能,经济如何依赖于低熵物质和能量的流动,以及人类作为生物动物的基本限制是什么。事实上,甚至无知本身也被忽略了,并被降低为风险和概率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信