Ownership Structure and Risk-Taking: Comparative Evidence from Private and State-Controlled Banks in China

Yizhe Dong, Chao Meng, M. Firth, W. Hou
{"title":"Ownership Structure and Risk-Taking: Comparative Evidence from Private and State-Controlled Banks in China","authors":"Yizhe Dong, Chao Meng, M. Firth, W. Hou","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2089979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study examines the impact of ownership structure on Chinese banks' risk-taking behaviours. We classify the Chinese commercial banks into three categories based on the types of controlling shareholder, and find that banks controlled by the government (GCBs) tend to take more risks than those controlled by state-owned enterprises (SOECBs) or private investors (PCBs). This is attributed to the severe political intervention and weak incentives to follow prudent bank management practices for GCBs. We also find that the results are more pronounced among banks with concentrated ownership presumably because the large controlling power helps to enhance the monitoring of the management and promotes prudent operating procedures. Our findings have important implications for the ongoing reform in the Chinese banking sector.","PeriodicalId":445596,"journal":{"name":"Capital Markets 2","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"130","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Capital Markets 2","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2089979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 130

Abstract

This study examines the impact of ownership structure on Chinese banks' risk-taking behaviours. We classify the Chinese commercial banks into three categories based on the types of controlling shareholder, and find that banks controlled by the government (GCBs) tend to take more risks than those controlled by state-owned enterprises (SOECBs) or private investors (PCBs). This is attributed to the severe political intervention and weak incentives to follow prudent bank management practices for GCBs. We also find that the results are more pronounced among banks with concentrated ownership presumably because the large controlling power helps to enhance the monitoring of the management and promotes prudent operating procedures. Our findings have important implications for the ongoing reform in the Chinese banking sector.
股权结构与风险承担:来自中国民营银行和国有银行的比较证据
本研究考察了股权结构对中国银行风险承担行为的影响。我们根据控股股东的类型将中国商业银行分为三类,发现政府控股的银行比国有企业控股的银行或私人投资者控股的银行承担的风险更大。这是由于严重的政治干预和政府间商业银行采取审慎银行管理做法的动机薄弱。我们还发现,这一结果在股权集中的银行中更为明显,这可能是因为大的控制权有助于加强对管理层的监督,促进审慎的经营程序。我们的研究结果对中国正在进行的银行业改革具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信