The investigation of malnutrition and life quality’s relation with mortality in the patients who are 65 years old and above and are hospitilazed at the palliative care service

Merve Lehimcioğlu, Gözde Şengül Ayçiçek, A. Çi̇fci̇
{"title":"The investigation of malnutrition and life quality’s relation with mortality in the patients who are 65 years old and above and are hospitilazed at the palliative care service","authors":"Merve Lehimcioğlu, Gözde Şengül Ayçiçek, A. Çi̇fci̇","doi":"10.51271/jopic-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: Our study aims to determine the impact of malnutrition on the quality of life of elderly patients receiving palliative care and identify the factors influencing quality of life.\nMethods: The study included patients aged 65 and older who were admitted to the Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty\nHospital Palliative Care Service between November 2019 and February 2020. Patients with a history of active malignancy,\nhospitalization within the past 3 months, severe dementia precluding obtaining written consent, and patients under 65 years of age were excluded. Scores obtained from the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) were recorded, with scores of 12 or higher considered as normal nutrition. Those with scores below 12 were reevaluated for malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, and those meeting any of the phenotypic and etiological criteria were considered malnourished. Malnutrition severity was reclassified according to the GLIM criteria. The 13-item OPQOLbrief questionnaire was used to evaluate their quality of life. The questionnaire was published in Turkish by Çalışkan et al. Each question was rated on a scale of 1-5, with “Strongly Disagree” scored as 1, “Disagree” as 2, “Undecided” as 3, “Agree” as 4, and “Strongly Agree” as 5.\nResults: The mean total MNA score was found to be statistically lower in patients classified as mild and severe malnutrition\naccording to the GLIM classification compared to those without malnutrition (p<0.001). The rate of MNA scores between 12\nand 14 in patients without malnutrition was higher than that of patients with mild and severe malnutrition, while the rate\nof scores between 8 and 11 was higher in patients with severe malnutrition. The rate of scores between 0 and 7 was higher\nin patients with mild and severe malnutrition (p<0.001). The mean total MNA (p<0.001) and QOL (p=0.021) scores were\nstatistically lower in patients with malnutrition compared to those without malnutrition. The rate of MNA scores between 12\nand 14 and between 8 and 11 was higher in patients without malnutrition, while the percentage of MNA scores between 0 and 7 was higher in patients with malnutrition.\nConclusion: In the geriatric patient group, we believe that the GLIM criteria used in our study are more comprehensive and\nsensitive in detecting malnutrition in terms of phenotypic and etiological aspects through patient questioning.","PeriodicalId":409345,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pulmonology and Intensive Care","volume":"52 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pulmonology and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/jopic-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Our study aims to determine the impact of malnutrition on the quality of life of elderly patients receiving palliative care and identify the factors influencing quality of life. Methods: The study included patients aged 65 and older who were admitted to the Kırıkkale University Medical Faculty Hospital Palliative Care Service between November 2019 and February 2020. Patients with a history of active malignancy, hospitalization within the past 3 months, severe dementia precluding obtaining written consent, and patients under 65 years of age were excluded. Scores obtained from the Mini Nutritional Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF) were recorded, with scores of 12 or higher considered as normal nutrition. Those with scores below 12 were reevaluated for malnutrition according to the Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) criteria, and those meeting any of the phenotypic and etiological criteria were considered malnourished. Malnutrition severity was reclassified according to the GLIM criteria. The 13-item OPQOLbrief questionnaire was used to evaluate their quality of life. The questionnaire was published in Turkish by Çalışkan et al. Each question was rated on a scale of 1-5, with “Strongly Disagree” scored as 1, “Disagree” as 2, “Undecided” as 3, “Agree” as 4, and “Strongly Agree” as 5. Results: The mean total MNA score was found to be statistically lower in patients classified as mild and severe malnutrition according to the GLIM classification compared to those without malnutrition (p<0.001). The rate of MNA scores between 12 and 14 in patients without malnutrition was higher than that of patients with mild and severe malnutrition, while the rate of scores between 8 and 11 was higher in patients with severe malnutrition. The rate of scores between 0 and 7 was higher in patients with mild and severe malnutrition (p<0.001). The mean total MNA (p<0.001) and QOL (p=0.021) scores were statistically lower in patients with malnutrition compared to those without malnutrition. The rate of MNA scores between 12 and 14 and between 8 and 11 was higher in patients without malnutrition, while the percentage of MNA scores between 0 and 7 was higher in patients with malnutrition. Conclusion: In the geriatric patient group, we believe that the GLIM criteria used in our study are more comprehensive and sensitive in detecting malnutrition in terms of phenotypic and etiological aspects through patient questioning.
65岁及以上姑息治疗住院患者营养不良及生活质量与死亡率的关系调查
目的:我们的研究旨在确定营养不良对姑息治疗老年患者生活质量的影响,并确定影响生活质量的因素。方法:研究纳入了2019年11月至2020年2月期间在Kırıkkale大学医学院医院姑息治疗服务中心就诊的65岁及以上患者。排除了有活动性恶性肿瘤病史、过去3个月内住院、无法获得书面同意的严重痴呆患者和65岁以下患者。记录从Mini nutrition Assessment-Short Form (MNA-SF)中获得的分数,12分或更高的分数被认为是正常的营养。根据全球营养不良领导倡议(GLIM)标准,对得分低于12分的人进行营养不良重新评估,符合表型和病因标准的人被认为营养不良。根据GLIM标准对营养不良严重程度进行重新分类。采用13项OPQOLbrief问卷对患者的生活质量进行评估。问卷由Çalışkan等人以土耳其语出版。每个问题的评分为1-5分,“非常不同意”为1分,“不同意”为2分,“未决定”为3分,“同意”为4分,“非常同意”为5分。结果:根据GLIM分级,轻度和重度营养不良患者的平均总MNA评分低于无营养不良患者(p<0.001)。非营养不良患者MNA得分在12 ~ 14分之间的比例高于轻度和重度营养不良患者,重度营养不良患者MNA得分在8 ~ 11分之间的比例高于轻度和重度营养不良患者。轻度和重度营养不良患者得分在0 ~ 7分之间的比例较高(p<0.001)。营养不良患者的平均总MNA (p<0.001)和生活质量(p=0.021)评分均低于无营养不良患者。MNA得分在12 - 14分和8 - 11分之间的比例在没有营养不良的患者中较高,而MNA得分在0 - 7分之间的比例在营养不良的患者中较高。结论:在老年患者组中,我们认为我们研究中使用的GLIM标准在通过患者询问来检测营养不良的表型和病因方面更为全面和敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书