{"title":"An ATE engineering environment","authors":"R. M. Ralls","doi":"10.1109/AUTEST.1991.197546","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The basics of the ATE software development process are discussed. The technique for determining the required capacities of various machine types and how to apply people to both is presented. Some of the management tools which can be used to characterize and manage the process are discussed. It is shown that the only point at which the specific tester makes a difference, is when the segment and sub-segment structure for an Ethernet system is laid out. The tester and its structures do affect the number of bridges used and their placement. Beyond that, the techniques outlined and the facility they define will accommodate any of the major testers and simulators as long as software compatibility remains the prime driver in the selection.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":320001,"journal":{"name":"Conference Record AUTOTESTCON '91 IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference Improving Systems Effectiveness in the Changing Environment of the '90s","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conference Record AUTOTESTCON '91 IEEE Systems Readiness Technology Conference Improving Systems Effectiveness in the Changing Environment of the '90s","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AUTEST.1991.197546","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The basics of the ATE software development process are discussed. The technique for determining the required capacities of various machine types and how to apply people to both is presented. Some of the management tools which can be used to characterize and manage the process are discussed. It is shown that the only point at which the specific tester makes a difference, is when the segment and sub-segment structure for an Ethernet system is laid out. The tester and its structures do affect the number of bridges used and their placement. Beyond that, the techniques outlined and the facility they define will accommodate any of the major testers and simulators as long as software compatibility remains the prime driver in the selection.<>