Quality Assurance Frameworks Comparisons in HEIs of Pakistan and China

D. Khan, U. Fatima, Junchao Zhang
{"title":"Quality Assurance Frameworks Comparisons in HEIs of Pakistan and China","authors":"D. Khan, U. Fatima, Junchao Zhang","doi":"10.19044/ejes.v7no2a2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Higher Education Commission in Pakistan and China is are responsible to check that all educational institutes of Pakistan comply with the Quality Assurance Framework (QAF). Work distribution, access to the digital library and the number of PhD faculty members in the institutes, are important for Higher Educational Institutes (HEIs) because they directly influence on quality of academic education and services being provided to the students. Mixed method approach is adopted. Quantitative results were obtained by carrying out survey in Pakistan while qualitative results were obtained through literature review. This research makes use of quantitative approach and investigates four different HEIs of Pakistan. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: 1) Role of work distribution; 2) access to the digital library; and 3) the number of Faculty members in the PhD faculty. A critical review was carried out for investigating the quality of HEIs in China because survey accessibility issues were faced when adopting quantitative approach. Analysis showed that most of the QAFs in Pakistan were weak in all three factors. Yet China had a better score when compared to Pakistan showing good work distribution; high number of digital libraries; and an adequate number of PhD faculty members.","PeriodicalId":245027,"journal":{"name":"The European Journal of Educational Sciences","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The European Journal of Educational Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19044/ejes.v7no2a2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Higher Education Commission in Pakistan and China is are responsible to check that all educational institutes of Pakistan comply with the Quality Assurance Framework (QAF). Work distribution, access to the digital library and the number of PhD faculty members in the institutes, are important for Higher Educational Institutes (HEIs) because they directly influence on quality of academic education and services being provided to the students. Mixed method approach is adopted. Quantitative results were obtained by carrying out survey in Pakistan while qualitative results were obtained through literature review. This research makes use of quantitative approach and investigates four different HEIs of Pakistan. The questionnaire was divided into three sections: 1) Role of work distribution; 2) access to the digital library; and 3) the number of Faculty members in the PhD faculty. A critical review was carried out for investigating the quality of HEIs in China because survey accessibility issues were faced when adopting quantitative approach. Analysis showed that most of the QAFs in Pakistan were weak in all three factors. Yet China had a better score when compared to Pakistan showing good work distribution; high number of digital libraries; and an adequate number of PhD faculty members.
巴基斯坦和中国高等学校的质量保证框架比较
巴基斯坦和中国的高等教育委员会负责检查巴基斯坦的所有教育机构是否符合质量保证框架(QAF)。工作分配、数字图书馆的使用和研究所博士教师的数量对高等教育机构(HEIs)很重要,因为它们直接影响学术教育的质量和向学生提供的服务。采用混合方法。定量结果是通过在巴基斯坦进行调查得出的,定性结果是通过文献综述得出的。本研究采用定量方法,对巴基斯坦四所不同的高等教育机构进行了调查。问卷分为三个部分:1)工作分配的角色;2)访问数字图书馆;3)博士生人数。由于采用定量方法时面临调查可及性问题,因此对中国高等教育质量的调查进行了批判性审查。分析表明,巴基斯坦的大多数qaf在这三个方面都很弱。然而,与表现出良好工作分配的巴基斯坦相比,中国的得分更高;数字图书馆数量众多;以及足够数量的博士教师。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信